catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
If you still believe in deadly climate change, this will help you sleep.
- Thread starter Robert W
- Start date
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,321
- 12,903
- 2,400
What you added is immaterial to my comments which you dodge over and over.
You are batting zero again.
abu afak
ALLAH SNACKBAR!
- Mar 3, 2006
- 7,979
- 2,772
- 315
Catatonic is right but in no Position to answer you.
I, OTOH, am so good at destroying ANYTHING you post you had to Say I was on Ignore.
You not only can't debate me, you have to ignore everything I post because it's destroyed EVERYTHING You've ever posted:
Classic Cognitive Dissonance.
Do you remember when you tried use an Old Marcott and I destroyed with his later opinion?
I do.
Here is Marcott for the last 12,000 years. Note anything UNnatural in the last few hundred?
([posted perhaps 30 or 40 times)
The UNnatural AGW SPIKE is now well up THRU the Top of this (12? year old graph) Graph.
And that is why SunburnedTommy has me on Ignore.
He's lost the Climate debate at least Ten times then had to vacate/ignore.
`
Last edited:
The empirical evidence from the geologic record shows that prior to the industrial revolution CO2 lagged temperature. by 800-1000 years. How do you explain that? Because CO2 lagging temperature means your explanation that temperatures got higher once CO2 got going is wrong.
Global temperature reconstructions leave a lot to be desired because they smooth out climate fluctuations. Each curve in your global temperature reconstruction shows significant fluctuations going on, but the aggregate hides that. You need to look at what is happening at the polar regions.
abu afak
ALLAH SNACKBAR!
- Mar 3, 2006
- 7,979
- 2,772
- 315
Oh look.
Your backwards (unsourced) chart is Polar Region Only which makes it choppy,
and we ARE talking about GLOBAL warming, Not the Choppier smaller poll area,
And.... your chart says:
"Years before 1950" which makes it IRRELEVANT to this discussion.
But has an entry for 1987!
but still/no matter shows the beginning of the AGW SPIKE rising towards our Interglacial High!
Add 20-40 years and you've got it well into to New Highs.
LOL, Backfire boy!
Your always Deceptive and Irrelevant charts are deflections/tomfoolery by a tomfool.
You're too Dishonest (even to your crazy self) to debate.
`
Last edited:
Your posts are mostly incoherent.
No other region is more susceptible to climate change than the polar regions which is especially true for the north pole. I'd explain why but I don't think you would be able to comprehend it. Needless to say if you want to know what the planet's climate is doing, look at the data for the polar regions.
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,321
- 12,903
- 2,400
He is hopeless despite that we post real data showing a different picture, he as usual ignored my Interglacial CO2/Temperature chart showing no relationship between CO2 changes and Temperature changes.
He is a B.E.L.E.I.V.E.R that is why he doesn't make cogent rebuttals as he doesn't know much of anything.
Matted Joybeard
Gold Member
- Dec 2, 2014
- 1,039
- 361
- 208
CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Warming releases CO2 from natural sinks. CO2 doesn't stop being a greenhouse gas depending on how it's introduced into the atmosphere. There's nothing controversial here.
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
OK show one.
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
I've heard that before and it was debunked.
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
There's a feedback loop with the Ocean that explains this.
You're moving the goal posts.
What I really want is to get to your guys hearts. The biosphere is one of the most complicated things in the Universe; you can debate it forever, but I clearly don't want to.
But we need to fight climate change. Elon Musk has been unwavering about that.
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,321
- 12,903
- 2,400
No there were several published papers showing similar results, they are legitimate but they are proxy based thus the divergence are general.
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,321
- 12,903
- 2,400
Certainly, from the following posts you never factually address but is a reply to your unsupported assertions:
Post #486 LINK
Post #487 LINK
Post # 488 LINK
Post # 497 LINK
Post #508 LINK
You are LYING constantly now as my posted links proves as I have been replying to your posts all along.
Since you never discuss anything, it has become a waste of my time while I showed that you are another boring and stupid warmist/alarmist ignoramus I have come across.
It is clear you are another miserable leftist who proudly and generously display your science illiteracy.
Last edited:
catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
No increase in Tornadoes, Hurricanes, no increase in major storms
No increase in Wildfires
No HOT SPOT after 35 years
No Positive Feedback Loop
No Sea Level acceleration
No Climate Emergency exist
There is plenty more to show that warmist/alarmists are pushing a barrage of lies everyday while there is nothing horrible going on.
Me - And how is any of this relevant to the science? There are still ways that natural disasters are getting worse.
And we don't want the consequences of delaying it!
Last edited:
No. That's incorrect. Please share with me your understanding of what made CO2 go up or down if it wasn't temperature.
94% of the planets CO2 is stored in the ocean. When the ocean warms up it releases CO2. When the ocean cools down it absorbs CO2. This is what caused CO2 to go up and down prior to the industrial revolution.
I'm not moving the goal posts. I'm explaining to you that the vast majority of the planet's CO2 (94%) is stored in the ocean. And that prior to the industrial revolution, it was changing temperatures which preceded and caused atmospheric CO2 to change. There is no other possible mechanism that can explain why CO2 went up and down. Prior to the industrial revolution it was the solubility of CO2 in water (i.e. the ocean) versus temperature that made CO2 correlate to temperature.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Zone1 Are atheists more likely to become psychopaths?
- Started by Midnight FM
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
