Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 131,244
- 25,580
- 2,180
...
We are the dominant culture.. assimilate it’s fun over here
"We"? YOU aren't the dominant anything, loser.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...
We are the dominant culture.. assimilate it’s fun over here
Are you a porn star?That's Lex Steele who is a porn star and guess what ? Even in porn. White supremacy runs deep.Whenever Jizz makes his run of the mill racist OPs about blacks this and blacks that.....
Remember this is what is at the heart of his rage...…..
View attachment 296914
Many non black and even black female porn stars don't wrk with blk guys.
You try finding me any female porn star that refuses to wrk with white guys ?
Good luck with that. Bcoz you wont. Bcoz she'd be finished in the industry.
Most WW strongly prefer WM. And many non black women prefer white men too.
If you're a white man in this planet n u cant get some ass, you have to b the lamest mofo that ever lived.
Nah, I think he just prefers white men in his porn searches or something I guess......Are you a porn star?That's Lex Steele who is a porn star and guess what ? Even in porn. White supremacy runs deep.Whenever Jizz makes his run of the mill racist OPs about blacks this and blacks that.....
Remember this is what is at the heart of his rage...…..
View attachment 296914
Many non black and even black female porn stars don't wrk with blk guys.
You try finding me any female porn star that refuses to wrk with white guys ?
Good luck with that. Bcoz you wont. Bcoz she'd be finished in the industry.
Most WW strongly prefer WM. And many non black women prefer white men too.
If you're a white man in this planet n u cant get some ass, you have to b the lamest mofo that ever lived.
Stick to the topic or I’ll kick you out punkAre you a porn star?That's Lex Steele who is a porn star and guess what ? Even in porn. White supremacy runs deep.Whenever Jizz makes his run of the mill racist OPs about blacks this and blacks that.....
Remember this is what is at the heart of his rage...…..
View attachment 296914
Many non black and even black female porn stars don't wrk with blk guys.
You try finding me any female porn star that refuses to wrk with white guys ?
Good luck with that. Bcoz you wont. Bcoz she'd be finished in the industry.
Most WW strongly prefer WM. And many non black women prefer white men too.
If you're a white man in this planet n u cant get some ass, you have to b the lamest mofo that ever lived.
Decent people also don't openly support guilty kids who you can see on video with a knife. And knife is a lethal weapon, and worthy of being shot over, which ironically this specific case proves the merits of the other.
If you don't know what you are talking about, stop talking. Otherwise you are a fool, speaking from ignorance, and supporting criminals.
Actually, I know more about the case than you do, and people in my family are friends with the piece of shit officer who did the shooting.
He had a three inch boy scout knife. The blade wasn't even out when he was shot.
A jury (mostly white) looked at the evidence and found him guilty on nearly all counts.
Nah, your full of crap.
We had guns since the beginning of this country, and people did not live in fear when everyone was armed back then.
That's a myth. Guns were rare in colonial America. They were relatively rare up until the 1960's.
Again, by the testimonies of Central Park 5, they said they saw the women, and witnessed her being attacked. They did nothing. They are guilty. If they had called police, and said they saw the attack.... I would agree they were wrongly accused. Of course if they had done this, they likely would have found the correct guy, and they would not have been sent to prison.
These were not "testimonies" these were coerced confessions by the police, that were immediately recanted.
They are guilty. You witness someone being attacked, and do nothing, you are guilty. Period. And it's because they did nothing, that the correct guy was not charged. That also makes them guilty. They are guilty.
No, they weren't there... that's the point. The confessions were false. They were deprived counsel.
Guns were relatively rare up until the 1960's?? WTF?
Got a link for that? I grew up in the 60s, and everyone I knew had Dads and Granddads with guns.
Ghetto talk.Yeah n ur momma and your sister are my bitchesAre you a porn star?
Real talk.Ghetto talk.
Would her being a liberal make you feel better??Victim blaming is fun when the victim isn't your daughterHas anyone here considered the position that the girl contributed to her own death. She should not have been there or she should have had the means to protect herself. Like Nicole Simpson she could have taken steps to protect herself but failed to do so. I know it is a shame that citizen can’t walk the streets in some places, but the fact is in some towns at certain times of the day the thugs rule; bear that in mind or suffer the consequences.
Now my other point is that justice is important. No one should be charge with a crime unless there is solid evidence that person committed a crime. Any one of us can be either the victim or the accused and all it takes is to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. I believe that three to five percent of the people in prison are innocent. No one should be convicted of a crime they did not commit; it would be better to have a system where everyone carried their own gun, protected themselves and then let the law work it out.
YAY!
No it is not fun, but it is the way it is. I would prefer a better country but this what we got. I sure don’t want to put people in prison when they committed no crime. But, you are right if it had been my daughter I would not be able to be objective. However, I did teach my daughter how to shoot. You know I would bet the girl was a liberal.
Will that fit into your need to simply everything in life into liberal/conservative boxes??
Most simpletons seem to live in that binary world.....I pity you...
They were guilty,, you are a typical white democrat that loves bad elements in the black community raping and killing
While it blows most people away to find out that none of the suspects' DNA was found on Meili, this is a sleight of hand. The trick is that we're looking at it through a modern lens. True, today, these kids' DNA would have been found allover the crime scene. But in 1989, DNA was a primitive science. Cops wouldn't have even bothered collecting samples for DNA tests back thenThey were guilty,, you are a typical white democrat that loves bad elements in the black community raping and killing
No, they weren't guilty. Someone else did it, he acted alone, which was proven by DNA evidence. The city paid out 41 MILLION in damages to the wrongfully convicted boys.
While it blows most people away to find out that none of the suspects' DNA was found on Meili, this is a sleight of hand. The trick is that we're looking at it through a modern lens. True, today, these kids' DNA would have been found allover the crime scene. But in 1989, DNA was a primitive science. Cops wouldn't have even bothered collecting samples for DNA tests back then
They confessed to itWhile it blows most people away to find out that none of the suspects' DNA was found on Meili, this is a sleight of hand. The trick is that we're looking at it through a modern lens. True, today, these kids' DNA would have been found allover the crime scene. But in 1989, DNA was a primitive science. Cops wouldn't have even bothered collecting samples for DNA tests back then
DNA evidence that was retained from her clothing DID confirm that the perpetrator was Matias Reyes, who had confessed to the crime.
The point is, racist, lazy cops fucked this case up. As a result, five innocent kids went to jail, the city had to pay them millions, and the real criminal stayed out and free for years and committed more murders and rapes.
They confessed to it
On the drive to the precinct, Raymond Santana blurted out, "I had nothing to do with the rape. All I did was feel the woman's t*ts." The cops didn't even know about a rape yet.
So the cops lied? Two of Korey Wise's friends said that when they ran into him on the street the day after the attack, he told them the cops were after him. "You heard about that woman that was beat up and raped in the park last night? That was us!"They confessed to it
On the drive to the precinct, Raymond Santana blurted out, "I had nothing to do with the rape. All I did was feel the woman's t*ts." The cops didn't even know about a rape yet.
Says the cops...
So you lock up a bunch of teens without their lawyers, and browbeat them for a couple of hours, they'd have probably confessed to kidnapping the Lindbergh baby and sinking the Lustitania.
So the cops lied? Two of Korey Wise's friends said that when they ran into him on the street the day after the attack, he told them the cops were after him. "You heard about that woman that was beat up and raped in the park last night? That was us!"
Taken to the scene of the crime by a detective and a prosecutor, he said, "Damn, damn, that's a lot of blood. ... I knew she was bleeding, but I didn't know how bad she was. It was dark. I couldn't see how much blood there was at night."
Wise also told a detective that someone he thought was named "Rudy" stole the jogger's Walkman and belt pouch. The jogger was still in a coma. The police did not know yet that a Walkman had been stolen from her.
Why? Even if they didn’t rape her it’s still rape because they were there, they also knocked out another jogger earlier in the night..So the cops lied? Two of Korey Wise's friends said that when they ran into him on the street the day after the attack, he told them the cops were after him. "You heard about that woman that was beat up and raped in the park last night? That was us!"
Taken to the scene of the crime by a detective and a prosecutor, he said, "Damn, damn, that's a lot of blood. ... I knew she was bleeding, but I didn't know how bad she was. It was dark. I couldn't see how much blood there was at night."
Wise also told a detective that someone he thought was named "Rudy" stole the jogger's Walkman and belt pouch. The jogger was still in a coma. The police did not know yet that a Walkman had been stolen from her.
It's not a stretch to conclude that a jogger in 1989 would have a walkman.. they were kind of standard equipment at the time.
Now, had they conducted a real investigation, based on what you list above, they'd have found the walkman. They'd have found the supposed blood on their clothes or shoes.
Why? Even if they didn’t rape her it’s still rape because they were there, they also knocked out another jogger earlier in the night..
Huh ? Why was it false?Why? Even if they didn’t rape her it’s still rape because they were there, they also knocked out another jogger earlier in the night..
Except- no evidence they were there, other than the false confessions.
That some of them might have been involved in assaulting another jogger is irrelevant.
Huh ? Why was it false?