You calling it a failure is a subjective opinion. Others think it has been successful in many ways.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
If you have "a question for Trump supporters..."
- Thread starter jwoodie
- Start date
You calling it a failure is a subjective opinion. Others think it has been successful in many ways.The success of the ACA does not hinge on the details and specifics. It confirmed and established that the federal government has an obligation and duty to ensure that citizens have some kind of access to affordable health care. That was a historical game changing event. The debate is no longer whether citizens have a right to affordable healthcare, it is about how it will be provided. The battle was won when Obamacare became law."Too early to see if the new healthcare legislation is better than that crap Obama passed."Yes, booting illegal aliens is a win for Trump.
Too early to see if the new healthcare legislation is better than that crap Obama passed.
your joking right? His legislation is a disaster. His own party wants no part of it.
What was so crappy about the ACA?
His legislation is a disaster.
Yes, Obamacare stunk up the joint.
What was so crappy about the ACA?
Where was my family's $2500 a year in savings?
You gotta love the insurers all dropping out. That's a clear sign it was a success, eh?
The success of the ACA does not hinge on the details and specifics.
Well, that's a convenient way to excuse its failure.
You calling it a failure is a subjective opinion
The recent, massive premium hikes and the exit of insurers is an objective sign of success?
Tell me more!
Others think it has been successful in many ways.
Sweet! Let's hear all about that.
The point is beyond your comprehension. Before the ACA became law the debate was about whether the government had any business being involved with providing healthcare to citizens. Once it was passed that bridge was crossed. Even the repeal and replace efforts do not try to cross back over the bridge. Government responsibility for healthcare has been established.You calling it a failure is a subjective opinion. Others think it has been successful in many ways.The success of the ACA does not hinge on the details and specifics. It confirmed and established that the federal government has an obligation and duty to ensure that citizens have some kind of access to affordable health care. That was a historical game changing event. The debate is no longer whether citizens have a right to affordable healthcare, it is about how it will be provided. The battle was won when Obamacare became law."Too early to see if the new healthcare legislation is better than that crap Obama passed."
your joking right? His legislation is a disaster. His own party wants no part of it.
What was so crappy about the ACA?
His legislation is a disaster.
Yes, Obamacare stunk up the joint.
What was so crappy about the ACA?
Where was my family's $2500 a year in savings?
You gotta love the insurers all dropping out. That's a clear sign it was a success, eh?
The success of the ACA does not hinge on the details and specifics.
Well, that's a convenient way to excuse its failure.
You calling it a failure is a subjective opinion
The recent, massive premium hikes and the exit of insurers is an objective sign of success?
Tell me more!
Others think it has been successful in many ways.
Sweet! Let's hear all about that.
The point is beyond your comprehension. Before the ACA became law the debate was about whether the government had any business being involved with providing healthcare to citizens. Once it was passed that bridge was crossed. Even the repeal and replace efforts do not try to cross back over the bridge. Government responsibility for healthcare has been established.You calling it a failure is a subjective opinion. Others think it has been successful in many ways.The success of the ACA does not hinge on the details and specifics. It confirmed and established that the federal government has an obligation and duty to ensure that citizens have some kind of access to affordable health care. That was a historical game changing event. The debate is no longer whether citizens have a right to affordable healthcare, it is about how it will be provided. The battle was won when Obamacare became law.His legislation is a disaster.
Yes, Obamacare stunk up the joint.
What was so crappy about the ACA?
Where was my family's $2500 a year in savings?
You gotta love the insurers all dropping out. That's a clear sign it was a success, eh?
The success of the ACA does not hinge on the details and specifics.
Well, that's a convenient way to excuse its failure.
You calling it a failure is a subjective opinion
The recent, massive premium hikes and the exit of insurers is an objective sign of success?
Tell me more!
Others think it has been successful in many ways.
Sweet! Let's hear all about that.
Yeah, new, unaffordable entitlements are awesome!!
The more money they lose, the more damage they cause, the more awesome they are, eh?
As I understand it they are doing it the way they are to keep Senate Democrats from filibustering the Republicans have control of the Senate but not a filibuster proof majority.Why aren't Trump and Republicans sending the repeal and replace bill they voted for over 50 times under Obama to the floor now that they control the White House and legislature?
Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,988
- 1,130
The point is beyond your comprehension. Before the ACA became law the debate was about whether the government had any business being involved with providing healthcare to citizens. Once it was passed that bridge was crossed. Even the repeal and replace efforts do not try to cross back over the bridge. Government responsibility for healthcare has been established.You calling it a failure is a subjective opinion. Others think it has been successful in many ways.The success of the ACA does not hinge on the details and specifics. It confirmed and established that the federal government has an obligation and duty to ensure that citizens have some kind of access to affordable health care. That was a historical game changing event. The debate is no longer whether citizens have a right to affordable healthcare, it is about how it will be provided. The battle was won when Obamacare became law.His legislation is a disaster.
Yes, Obamacare stunk up the joint.
What was so crappy about the ACA?
Where was my family's $2500 a year in savings?
You gotta love the insurers all dropping out. That's a clear sign it was a success, eh?
The success of the ACA does not hinge on the details and specifics.
Well, that's a convenient way to excuse its failure.
You calling it a failure is a subjective opinion
The recent, massive premium hikes and the exit of insurers is an objective sign of success?
Tell me more!
Others think it has been successful in many ways.
Sweet! Let's hear all about that.
and Trump will insure it stays established ...
SUCKERS
Well, I guess this means that with the advent of a Trump presidency, we're not quite so worried about what is and what is not in the Constitution any more.Why do you make up such garbage?The same place that using Food Stamps to buy Colt 45 and Crack is.Where is that in the Constitution?
.
Why don't you ask ME? Or are you afraid of a cogent response? (I notice that most liberals like to refer to unspecified third parties in order to avoid having to justify their own opinions.)
I'm guessing no one thinks you're bright enough to answer questions.
just saying.
- Banned
- #69
Psh they have reconciliation and the nuclear option available. They voted 50 times. The truth is their desire to stay in power is stronger than their belief that this is the right thing to do.As I understand it they are doing it the way they are to keep Senate Democrats from filibustering the Republicans have control of the Senate but not a filibuster proof majority.Why aren't Trump and Republicans sending the repeal and replace bill they voted for over 50 times under Obama to the floor now that they control the White House and legislature?
I'm simply telling you what I have heard how you choose to process it is up to you.Psh they have reconciliation and the nuclear option available. They voted 50 times. The truth is their desire to stay in power is stronger than their belief that this is the right thing to do.As I understand it they are doing it the way they are to keep Senate Democrats from filibustering the Republicans have control of the Senate but not a filibuster proof majority.Why aren't Trump and Republicans sending the repeal and replace bill they voted for over 50 times under Obama to the floor now that they control the White House and legislature?
- Thread starter
- #72
Why does Trump lie constantly?Why don't you ask ME? Or are you afraid of a cogent response? (I notice that most liberals like to refer to unspecified third parties in order to avoid having to justify their own opinions.)
Consistency.
- Thread starter
- #73
Okay: I'm listening to Limbaugh right now, as he waxes poetic about the virtues of Trump's big ol' big government one TRILLION dollar infrastructure idea.
Where is that in the Constitution?
.
I don't the Constitution mentions any specific amounts.
- Thread starter
- #74
Have you noticed that our questions aren't being answered?Trump said he would release his taxes after the audit . Now he says he will never release his taxes .
How do you trust him when he lied and is also obviously covering something his taxes would reveal .
Yes, I was away WORKING.
- Thread starter
- #75
Why is Trump not concerned about adding $10 trillion to the debt after he spent a year and half lambasting Obama for adding less than that?
Trump hasn't added $10 trillion to the debt.
He's proposed exactly that. And that's a conservative estimate. We all know way more is added than proposed in the initial presidential budget.
He proposed adding $10 trillion to the debt? When?
Donald Trump’s Tax Plan Could Tack $10 Trillion onto America’s Debt
Could.....or not.
Did Obama's budget plan propose adding $9.3 trillion to the deficit?
I don't think so.
- Thread starter
- #76
It sure in hell beat whatever Bush tried to do. You think Trump is going to do better?No he didn't say it, but income would be 10 trillion less than expensesThat ws his budget proposalHe proposed adding $10 trillion to the debt? When?
His budget proposal did not say he'd add $10 trillion to the deficit.
Based on what? Obama's crappy growth rate?
Yes.
- Thread starter
- #77
Health care and immigration have been huge winners for Trump- right?Why don't you ask ME? Or are you afraid of a cogent response? (I notice that most liberals like to refer to unspecified third parties in order to avoid having to justify their own opinions.)
When are we going to get tired of all the winning?
Yes.
Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,506
- 2,250
General Welfare Clause.Okay: I'm listening to Limbaugh right now, as he waxes poetic about the virtues of Trump's big ol' big government one TRILLION dollar infrastructure idea.
Where is that in the Constitution?
.
And it doesn't seem to bother you that we spend that much building cities on other countries,
- Thread starter
- #79
have you noticed that the Trumpster just put his tax cuts on a back burner?
No.
- Thread starter
- #80
What was so crappy about the ACA?
Coercion and fraudulent cost projections.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 76
- Views
- 682
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 32
- Views
- 261
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 151
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8296
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 477
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-