If you can't laugh at this then you're taking yourself too seriously

Simply not counted. It shouldn't be hard to fathom.

What's hard to fathom is the record turn-out and fewer votes counted. That's what I'm suggesting.
Ahhhh.....hmmm....
Yeah I was expecting Trump to register something like 80 million.... And yes Kamala's number was suspiciously low.
Surprisingly low.
 
There is happiness today There is disappointment today. However one thing remains always intact.... The ingenious humor of those who are driven whether by zeal or by frustration to express themselves in ways that we can all appreciate and laugh at. I don't care who you are.... This is just plain funny.View attachment 1037609
LOL. If you ask me, the wording is backwards.
 
False premise fallacy. Do your home work.
You don't know what you're talking about. What false premise have I made? That there was greater enthusiasm and larger turn-out in both early and same-day voting?
Feel free to prove that wrong. Your assumption that 2020 was stolen is without any basis except your assumption. THAT'S your false premise.
Also, the logical validity of an argument is based on its internal consistency, not the truth of its premises. My premise is based on observable facts. Your premise is based on its conclusion. What logical fallacy is that?
 
1730922604231.webp1730922635438.webp
 
The algorithms informed the divide, for sure. If you're suggesting the polling was skewed by the information coming from election workers, mayors and reporters, it still doesn't account for fewer votes.
Hey shitbag! You know what does? Massive cheating in 2020, you retard!
That's reality, boyo.
 
You don't know what you're talking about. What false premise have I made? That there was greater enthusiasm and larger turn-out in both early and same-day voting?
Feel free to prove that wrong. Your assumption that 2020 was stolen is without any basis except your assumption. THAT'S your false premise.
Also, the logical validity of an argument is based on its internal consistency, not the truth of its premises. My premise is based on observable facts. Your premise is based on its conclusion. What logical fallacy is that?

So we have a statistical anomaly that doesn't have any real, logical or consistent causation. Do you suppose that the this may indeed be a real case of election tampering? 15 million missing ballots actually closer to 20 million counting Trump's Delta Factor would be pretty hard to hide I think. If they are missing that is. If not it could actually point the finger back to 2020 as the statistical anomaly.
 
There were30 million more elegible and 19 million newly registered voters this past year and 20 million fewer votes?
Implausible.

1730923192265.png

So we have a statistical anomaly that doesn't have any real, logical or consistent causation. Do you suppose that the this may indeed be a real case of election tampering? 15 million missing ballots actually closer to 20 million counting Trump's Delta Factor would be pretty hard to hide I think. If they are missing that is. If not it could actually point the finger back to 2020 as the statistical anomaly.
Dance around it all you want, but dance alone.
You keep ignoring increased numbers of voters, about 40 million since 2020, especially the 19 million newly registered this year. Poll workers reported record numbers of voters NOT 15% fewer. THAT'S the anomaly.
 
You could also look at this, and instead of asking why there are fewer votes this time, and ask why there were so many in 2020.
Because there was greater enthusiasm and record-setting early votes and longer lines before?

Does that make sense to you?
 
I'm suspecting the plan behind intimidating election workers and replacing them with people with no reason to fear.

I can tell you one thing from personal experience: If you have friends or relatives in a nursing home or hospital, today would be good day to visit them.
Their caregivers are upset. Being in a "bad mood" is an understatement.
Aww are your feelings hurt there fella?
 
Aww are your feelings hurt there fella?
I'm fine. But healthcare providers are in a bad mood for a reason.
Have you ever been an advocate for someone hospitalized? And especially after the devastation Covid had on their numbers? "Short-staffed" doesn't begin to describe the condition our system of hands-on care is in. And they are mostly people of color.
 
Back
Top Bottom