A new study has just found that there are exactly 541,377 election criteria actually more important than Benfuckingghazi.
Who knew.
Probably no topic is more relevant to my current sigline than this idiotic malarkey. It's hard to believe we're so sheeped-up that somebody actually bought this crap.
Actually, if you were take you partisan glasses off, you would see what the Benghazi situation exposed.
If Hillary Clinton and her underlings (such as Rice) had simply said "there is an investigation and a few theories, but we will not rush to judgment until all evidence is in......there would be no reason to care about Benghazi.
But something very serious has been exposed...
Hillary Clinton, who wants to be the leader of the USA had no issue whatsoever with prematurely blaming an American Citizen who was exercising his right to free speech for an attack on Americans.
Think about it. She had a choice to NOT blame an American...and only had to if and when the evidence proved an American deserved the blame....but she opted to blame that American off the cuff.
Do you feel comfortable electing a President who is so quick to tell the world that it was one of our most sacred rights that caused the attack on Benghazi?
Isn't a President supposed to support our rights....not find ways to announce their flaws?
I find it interesting that I have mentioned this (above) 4 times on this site over the last several days....and not one person on the left has tried to challenge it.
I wonder if that is because they agree that a Presidential hopeful should never blame a killing on the first amendment unless the evidence 100% proves it.
Of course, we will get the Bendogs and Pogos who will say..."no one responds to it because it isn't worth responding to.
But that doesn't change the fact that Hillary Clinton opted to blame one of our most sacred rights on the killing of an American...even though most of her advisors told her otherwise.
I imagine everybody ignores it because it's mindless.
Back that up, big boy. Go ahead. Back it up.
Did Hillary Clinton and her staff (Rice) prematurely blame an American Citizen exercising his right to free speech? Yes or no?
Did Hillary Clinton have several options to choose from....American exercising his right to free speech; planned terrorist attack; not sure, we are waiting for the investigation to be complete........yes or no?
Never mind. You are a mindless putz.
This is why I normally don't respond to you. You simply view the world differently than I. I don't agree with the Sup Ct decision on saying it's ok to burn an American flag, or draw nasty pictures of anyone's prophet, or burning a Koran should be protected free, or political, speech. I think they are incitements to riot. A lot of cops don't like free speech meaning the Klan can march and make it necessary that they protect the Klan. Your focus on Hill or Obama somehow blaming some American for exercising his free speech simply misses the mark. The aszhole who made the video managed to get the Egypt embassy attacked. Fck, him and the camel he rode in on. I'd like to have him pay the bill.
At sometime between 9-16 and 11.-2 the Admin must have learned that while some of what happened in Libya was not a spontaneous riot. I think it's clear that they didn't give Susan Rice the full information about possible terrorist pre-planning before she went out on talk shows, but it's also clear that the Admin didn't really know really what had occurred ... beyond having a dead ambassador and an arms transfer CIA operation failure. And, imo, the administration may well have not been as quickly forthcoming on it being a terrorist attack.
But one reason I voted for W in 2000 was he didn't try to politicize the Cole bombing. I don't know what happened to that guy, but rather than elevating him like Pearl Harbor did with FDR and Ft. Sumter with Lincoln, he became a much smaller human being after 9-11. Mitt had already disgusted me with his pandering to the tea party, but his attempts to politicize the attacks were low, imo. I didn't vote for anybody to be potus in 2012. But, I don't blame Hillary for Stevens' death.
A) The entire Obama administration thinks "POLITICAL" impact before they think "American" impact and ESPECIALLY 6 weeks before
re-election. They couldn't let any American voter think Obama was weak on defense i.e. war on terror was not going well which is
WHY they blamed it on the video.
THAT is what really ticks me off is people like especially don't see this was a political calculation and as such rather then admit
failure they spun it as they have done over to something else.
B) As far as "blaming Hillary" that's never been the issue! IT was covering up the attack for political gain.
C) Bush became smaller?
How many times do I have to repeat these major EVENTS that have NEVER happened to any other president???
1) Are you aware that a recession started under Clinton and became official 3/01 ended 11/01?
Source:
USATODAY.com - It s official 2001 recession only lasted eight months
2) A Major $5 trillion market loss ...Are you aware that the dot.com bust occurred and cost $5 trillion in losses?
According to the Los Angeles Times, when the dot-com bubble burst, it wiped out $5 trillion dollars in market value for tech companies. More than half of the Internet companies created since 1995 were gone by 2004 - and hundreds of thousands of skilled technology workers were out of jobs. Source:
The dot-com bubble How to lose 5 trillion Anderson Cooper 360 - CNN.com Blogs
3)Obviously most of you are UNAWARE 9/11 cost 3,000 lives, $2 trillion in lost businesses,market values assets.
Jobs lost in New York owing to the attacks: 146,100 JUST in New York.
The 9/11 terrorist attacks were the events that helped shape other financial events of the decade. After that terrible day in September 2001, our economic climate was never to be the same again. It was only the third time in history that the New York Stock Exchange was shut down for a period of time. In this case, it was closed from September 10 - 17. Besides the tragic human loss of that day, the economic loss cannot even be estimated. Some estimate that there was over $60 billion in insurance losses alone. Airlines didn't fly for 3 days!
Approximately 18,000 small businesses were either displaced or destroyed in Lower Manhattan after the Twin Towers fell. There was a buildup in homeland security on all levels. 9/11 caused a catastrophic financial loss for the U.S.
Source:
The Top 10 Financial Events of the Decade
Anthrax Attacks...
The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States, also known as Amerithrax from its Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) case name, occurred over the course of several weeks beginning on Tuesday, September 18, 2001, one week after the September 11 attacks. Letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to several news media offices and two DemocraticU.S. Senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others.
4) $1 trillion in losses due to the WORST Hurricane SEASONS in history.
The worst, Katrina made landfall in Louisiana as a Category 3 in 2005. It took 1,836 lives and caused $81.2 billion in damages. It quickly became the biggest natural disaster in U.S. history, almost destroying New Orleans due to severe flooding.
And YOU think Bush became "smaller"????
AND YOU DIDN"T vote because Romney "pandered" to Tea Party??
You are truly one of those "t..rds" that has nearly cost us our country!
Didn't even vote! WHAT A DICK!~!!
