No, they are in fact holding children hostage by not funding the govt
If you are a child and disabled, you are out of luck, thanks to Trump
- Thread starter Luckyone
- Start date
GLASNOST
Platinum Member
I can prove it alright, but you're not intelligent enough to understand it.
For society to progress, do you believe the disabled should be euthanised? If you're a Zebra and ill, the heard will kill you so you don't slow them down. Should humans be like Zebras in that regard?
Put it another way. If you're marooned on a desert island with a mong in a wheelchair, should you focus on your own survival or suffer and risk it helping the mong?
- Thread starter
- #124
That is funny, you not even trying to prove it but you certainly debase me back in return!
It is sad who you are!
- Thread starter
- #125
Show me when (with proof) that they haven't always cared about "children", and I mean LIVE and breathing on their own children!!!!
Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 28,209
- 20,584
- 2,415
GLASNOST
Platinum Member
"Sad"? That's not for me to decide but my intelligence is intact. You never had any.
Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 28,209
- 20,584
- 2,415
- Thread starter
- #129
Here is worse and by Trump:
The family separation policy under the first Trump administration was a controversial immigration enforcement strategy implemented in the United States from 2017 to 2018, aimed at deterring illegal immigration by separating migrant children from their parents or guardians. The policy, presented to the public as a "zero tolerance" approach, was intended to encourage tougher legislation and discourage unauthorized crossings. In some cases, families following the legal procedure to apply for asylum at official border crossings were also separated. Under the policy, federal authorities separated children and infants from parents or guardians with whom they had entered the U.S. The adults were prosecuted and held in federal jails or deported, and the children were placed under the supervision of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Prior to their transfer to HHS, some children spent three weeks or more in overcrowded border control centers, where they reported minimal food, no access to clean clothes or bathing facilities, and no adult caretakers; girls as young as ten were taking care of younger children.
Family separations began in the summer of 2017, prior to the public announcement of the "zero tolerance" policy in April 2018. The policy was officially adopted across the entire U.S.–Mexico border from April 2018 until June 2018. The practice of family separation continued for at least eighteen months after the policy's official end, with an estimated 1,100 families separated between June 2018 and the end of 2019. In total, more than 5,500 children, including infants, were separated from their families.
By early June 2018, it emerged that the policy did not include measures to reunite the families that it had separated. had directed his staff not to maintain a list of children who had been separated from their parents. Matthew Albence, head of enforcement and removal operations for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, had told his colleagues to prevent reunification even after the parents had been processed by the judicial system, saying that reunification "undermines the entire effort"
- Thread starter
- #130
Wow, making outlandish statements without knowing me personally or having run any tests, certainly shows YOUR level of intelligence.........which is zero.
Do you even know where I went to school? what year I graduated? what degrees I have? What I have accomplished in life? the honors I have received?
- Thread starter
- #131
You mean to say that over half of all Americans and under water?
Hurricanelover
Diamond Member
- Oct 4, 2021
- 3,952
- 4,454
- 1,938
The republican party quite literally wants everything to go back to the effin 18th century. Where everyone did everything for themselves or died. Of course, they have no problem regulating everything you effin do that doens't follow their fucked up straight line!!!! Godly in shit you know.
They literally don't believe in government helping people or society in general working together on anything.
China is the biggest winner as they'll rule the world as America pulls all the way the **** out. This is exactly why Russia is now a joke as this mindset doesn't work and will end up with your country being a joke as being a major power requires society working together.
They literally don't believe in government helping people or society in general working together on anything.
China is the biggest winner as they'll rule the world as America pulls all the way the **** out. This is exactly why Russia is now a joke as this mindset doesn't work and will end up with your country being a joke as being a major power requires society working together.
Nobody911
Platinum Member
- Nov 26, 2022
- 1,067
- 526
- 938
The claim that disabled children are completely "out of luck" due to Trump's policies is an overstatement, but there are valid concerns about cuts, layoffs, and policy shifts affecting disabled students and children in the United States under his administration. motherjones+2 
Policy Changes Affecting Disabled Children
Recent developments include significant layoffs at the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights, which enforces laws protecting disabled students. There are also proposals to restructure how federal funding is distributed for special education, potentially bypassing state education agencies and creating uncertainty about oversight and consistent protections. These changes are largely influenced by the Project 2025 agenda, which could fundamentally alter how disabled children access resources and support. brookings+1
Concerns Raised and Future Risks
Layoffs and Funding Shifts: The loss of staff and potential changes in funding oversight raise concerns about the ability to enforce existing protections for disabled children. abcnews.go+2
Uncertainty for Families: Some proposals could give families more freedom to choose educational settings but may reduce centralized protections and reliable support for disabled students. brookings
Not All Support Eliminated: Despite cuts and risks, the administration has not entirely eliminated federal support for disabled children, and IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) funding has not been cut outright as of the latest budget request. brookings
Why People Believe "Disabled Kids Are Out of Luck"
Frustration and fear stem from reduced federal oversight, potential gaps in funding, and high-profile layoffs that cast doubt on the reliability of protections for disabled children moving forward. While some advocacy groups frame the situation as dire, the reality is more nuanced: supports exist but future accessibility and equity remain uncertain under current and proposed policy changes. motherjones+2
In sum, disabled children are facing new challenges and risks due to ongoing policy changes, but they are not "out of luck" or abandoned entirely by the federal government. The situation is evolving, and families and advocates are watching developments closely. abcnews.go+1
sources:
1. The Trump Administration’s War on Disability
2. Trump's new layoffs hurt disabled kids
3. Trump's Worst Offense? Mocking Disabled Reporter, Poll Finds
4. Trump administration weighs future of special education oversight and funding | Brookings
5. Donald Trump denies mocking disabled reporter
6. Special education staff decimated after Trump administration shutdown firings: Sources
7.
8. https://www.cbpp.org/blog/trump-adm...-highly-effective-support-for-disabled-people
Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
Then the Dems should not have voted to shut down the government. Democrats have done this.
They were hated and unwanted, unworthy of protection, even before they emerged from the womb.
Fucktarded Dimz are consistent in their hatred for children.
Well, that's stupid all right.
Because the two choices are not contingent on one another, they are mutually exclusive.
1. I am responsible only for my own healthcare, and you are responsible for yours.
2. I have no right or claim to the wealth of another human being to pay for my own responsibilities, and neither do you.
Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
I don't think you are phrasing that question correctly. Don't you mean to ask:
"if someone gave you a choice between keeping your health care or making the rich get richer, would you choose the latter?
- Thread starter
- #138
answer it!
- Thread starter
- #139
BS. There are a lot of people that don't have the ability to be 100% responsible for their health care given by reasons they have no control of. Secondly, the governments throughout the world help their citizens with health care. Heck, even Russia:
AI Overview
Yes, the government of Russia provides free healthcare to its citizens through a system of compulsory medical insurance funded by employer contributions. While citizens have a constitutional right to free medical care in state and municipal facilities, the quality of public healthcare can be inconsistent due to funding issues, leading to long wait times and shortages in some areas.
Your second response about the right of the wealthy, is exactly the problem with what is wrong with our nation. The very word "nation" means a group of people helping each other against those not of our nation. We should work as a "team" not as a group of 346 million individual islands where each person is in charge of everything in their own island.
That is the difference between the Republican thinking and the Democrat thinking
When they advocated for children to mutilate their bodies and inject them with hormones.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
Radical Dem. Julie Johnson compares the 2 died by ICE to Islamic Republic executing scores- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 3
-
Latest Discussions
-
-
-
Hold This L: Judge curb-stomps the GOP's pathetic pentagon press ban- Latest: Fort Fun Indiana
-
