If you are a child and disabled, you are out of luck, thanks to Trump

answer it!
Of course I would not want to give up my healthcare to make the rich richer. if that really were the choice, I'd be completely agreeing with you.

At least once I fixed your question.

The choices currently on the table in the controversy over the Democrats' versus the Republicans' continuing resolutions are this:

Are you willing to have your hard-earned tax dollars spent providing Obamacare to people who crossed the border illegally and were given "legal status?"

and

Do you want to have your hard earned dollars spent to provide Obamacare to people who refuse to work or do community service a minimum of twenty hours a week?

and

Do you want half a trillion of your hard-earned tax dollars given to the public broadcasting corporation?

and

Are you so insistent on spending your money thusly, that you are willing to shut down the entire government if you cannot get your way on those issues?

Or

would you have a clean continuing resolution that keep the spending plan exactly the way it was on september thirtieth, including the time limit set by Democrats on covid related obamacare subsidies for seven weeks while the above isdues are negotiated?
 
Last edited:
Of course I would not want to give up my healthcare to make the rich richer. if that really were the choice, I'd be completely agreeing with you.

At least once I fixed your question.

The choices currently on the table in the controversy over the Democrats' versus the Republicans' continuing resolutions are this:

Are you willing to have your hard-earned tax dollars spent providing Obamacare to people who crossed the border illegally and were given "legal status?"

and

Do you want to have your hard earned dollars spent to provide Obamacare to people who refuse to work or do community service a minimum of twenty hours a week?

The problem here is that you are supporting a LIE. Obama a care is NOT supporting illegals. It is supporting 20 million Americans that would lose their health coversge
and

Do you want half a trillion of your hard-earned tax dollars given to the public broadcasting corporation?

I don’t have Galdino a trillion but if I had, I would spend a lot if it helping those who needed it
and

Are you so insistent on spending your money thusly, that you are willing to shut down the entire government if you cannot get your way on those issue

If it meant giving in to something worse for myself and those I love, I would Gladita do it


Or

would you have a clean continuing resolution that keep the spending plan exactly the way it was on september thirtieth, including the time limit set by Democrats on covid related obamacare subsidies for seven weeks while the above isdues are negotiated?

Unfortunately, the right only responde to strength as that is what they use, meaning that they have the left playing in their fíele, so using the rules they have imposed, is the only way to win. Winning is the rule here!
 
When they advocated for children to mutilate their bodies and inject them with hormones.
They advocate fir the right to do with your own body what you want. You want others to tell you what to do with your own body?
 
The problem here is that you are supporting a LIE. Obama a care is NOT supporting illegals. It is supporting 20 million Americans that would lose their health coversge
Is it supporting people who crossed the border illegally and were given "a legal status?" Yes it is. Why reward lawbreakers?
I don’t have Galdino a trillion but if I had, I would spend a lot if it helping those who needed it
Kewl, but that is not in the Dem CR. Half a trillion for PBS is.
If it meant giving in to something worse for myself and those I love, I would Gladita do it
Odd meaning of "love" that.
Unfortunately, the right only responde to strength as that is what they use, meaning that they have the left playing in their fíele, so using the rules they have imposed, is the only way to win. Winning is the rule here!
And we (the American people) are winning now!
 
They advocate fir the right to do with your own body what you want. You want others to tell you what to do with your own body?
You have a right to do with your own body what you want, you have no right to take the life of a separate life living inside you. That is immoral.
 
The Schumer shut down the government for 2 reasons. To protect his speakership and bribe illegals with free healthcare.
Illegals aren't by law getting free health care & there is no plan in the works to give them free health care, you moron.

You're just willfully stupid.
 
If he needs help, Schumer can agree to a clean CR to keep government funded. This means NEITHER side is asking for anything, its a "hey, let's just keep things going while we work on the real bill", democrats said nope!
Schumer is doing what he's doing because there isn't a Republicon, including Trump who can be trusted as far as you could throw them.

Would you trust anyone who lies thru their teeth everytime they open their yaps?
 
Schumer is doing what he's doing because there isn't a Republicon, including Trump who can be trusted as far as you could throw them.

Would you trust anyone who lies thru their teeth everytime they open their yaps?
Ahh .. so Schumer is the now considered the most honest liar? :auiqs.jpg:
 
Is it supporting people who crossed the border illegally and were given "a legal status?" Yes it is. Why reward lawbreakers

If they are here "legally", they are following our laws, and are doing what we asked of them, meaning they have the right to get the help, the same way we all have the right.
Kewl, but that is not in the Dem CR. Half a trillion for PBS is. Your first statement on this was ridiculous to begin with

Odd meaning of "love" that.

love is doing whhat is right
And we (the American people) are winning now!
No, we are all losing now, but that is Trump's fault. He set the rules
 
Illegals aren't by law getting free health care & there is no plan in the works to give them free health care, you moron.

You're just willfully stupid.


"As of April 2025, 14 states plus D.C. provide comprehensive state-funded coverage to children regardless of immigration status (Figure 6). These states include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and D.C. Additionally, two of these states (New Jersey and Vermont) also provide state-funded coverage to income-eligible pregnant people regardless of immigration status, with Vermont extending this coverage for 12 months postpartum.

As of April 2025, seven states (California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Washington) plus D.C. have also expanded fully state-funded coverage to at least some income-eligible adults regardless of immigration status (Figure 7). Some additional states cover some income-eligible adults who are not otherwise eligible due to immigration status using state-only funds but limit coverage to specific groups, such as lawfully present immigrants who are in the five-year waiting period for Medicaid coverage, or provide more limited benefits. In addition to these states, Maryland plans to allow income-eligible individuals to purchase Marketplace coverage without subsidies regardless of immigration status starting November 2025 through a section 1332 waiver. Recently, some states have proposed rolling back state-funded health coverage for some groups of immigrants due to budget constraints."




 
So when illegals go to the ER who pays for it?
The law says they have to be treated. Or do you want them to say, bleed out at the curb?

The answer from you is a resounding "yes".
 
15th post
"As of April 2025, 14 states plus D.C. provide comprehensive state-funded coverage to children regardless of immigration status (Figure 6). These states include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and D.C. Additionally, two of these states (New Jersey and Vermont) also provide state-funded coverage to income-eligible pregnant people regardless of immigration status, with Vermont extending this coverage for 12 months postpartum.

As of April 2025, seven states (California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Washington) plus D.C. have also expanded fully state-funded coverage to at least some income-eligible adults regardless of immigration status (Figure 7). Some additional states cover some income-eligible adults who are not otherwise eligible due to immigration status using state-only funds but limit coverage to specific groups, such as lawfully present immigrants who are in the five-year waiting period for Medicaid coverage, or provide more limited benefits. In addition to these states, Maryland plans to allow income-eligible individuals to purchase Marketplace coverage without subsidies regardless of immigration status starting November 2025 through a section 1332 waiver. Recently, some states have proposed rolling back state-funded health coverage for some groups of immigrants due to budget constraints."




You do know that we are a Republic, where each State can set their own rules. don't you?
 
In addition:

Children's Health

This 4-year-old's heart is failing. A federal grant that might help him was canceled

"This is decimating the office responsible for safeguarding the rights of infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities," said one department employee, who, like the others NPR spoke with, requested anonymity for fear of retribution.

When our children (especially the disabled ones) are hurt by man trying to exercise his will and power (a wanting-to-be-a-dictator person like Trump). that is going over the line and should be punished by getting him out of office!
Why do we need a federal agency to oversee state disabled education?... this act will probably save money and that savings will go directly to the states or stay at the state... not soaked up by an unnecessary federal agency...
 
Back
Top Bottom