If Winning Is The Only Thing That Counts…

[White 6]

Your premise starts by building on very poor examples, like a house built upon the sand. Whatever makes you think anyone believes Soviet Communism, Mao, or Hitler? are examples of winning? To start with a straw-man proposition is fallacious, at best. Haven't been around here all that long, but have seen your writing/reasoning. This is not your best work.

You couldn't be more wrong.


Careful application of the English language.....of which, it appears, I am more facile than your are....even though English is not my first language....would indicate that the post showed that winning is all-important to the Soviet Communists, or Mao. Or Hitler.


The slaughter of millions indicates so.


Read more carefully in the future.


It also appears that allowing you to judge my writing would not be provident.

Nice try, but no cigar. Your opening statement smacked of propaganda that insults the mind. I was trained to resist inductive propaganda. So, I rejected yours. Effective propaganda starts not with a frontal assault, but by luring the susceptible in with comfortable truths before planting the seeds of half truths. You supported with a, b, c that were not clear unquestionable facts. I have not seen evidence that Democrats would ever try to (win) if you choose to call it that by killing millions. Your command of my native language is admirable, possibly more agile rather than facile. If I was briefly in your country (when I was much younger) I usually only knew enough language to navigate the transportation required, negotiate price of goods and order food when there wasn't an easily understood menu. I have learned much from people I considered less skilled. You might also.

BTW, love your avatar. she's hot. Did you know her? Did she shave her legs? And, just what is your native language?

I can't help you.....this is why you should have waited 'til at least the fifth grade to drop out.

Never asked you for help. Maybe you would be more effective from your native country if you aren't there right now.

She's as American as I am, buster. Consider yourself slapped with a pair of gloves on the chin.

Well hell ladies, have some apple pie and a saucer of milk. PMS much?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Can you provide the laws he broke? How about the lives he lost? Or better yet any proof he has done this to enhance his own fortune?

Where have you been? DC is a cess pool of self loathing hypocrites who only inflate there own well being! The purpose behind the Revolution was to gain freedom from this same mentality, I find it astonishing how so many didn’t learn this from our Public Education system....

The emolument clause for one

And that would be???

Oh you don't know what that is ? Don't feel bad ,rump evidently doesn't either

Child, I’m well aware of the “Emoluments Clause” and what it means, mine was a question that obviously went over your head, again, what is it that he violated of the clause, can you state the facts with proof or are you just another robot repeating the hatred of the LMSM?

Maybe this will help you sonny
Trump’s Business Ties and the Problem With Emoluments

Poor eddie......

There is no emoluments issure vis a vis Trump.....just one more lie with which they've gotten your hopes up....


"George Washington and the Emoluments Clauses
The Practices of our First President Suggest That President Trump is not violating the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses

...the practices of our First President suggest that President Trump is not violating the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clause. The former provision does not apply to elected officials like the President, and the latter provision does not prohibit business transactions. We have also submitted many amicus briefs on this issue."
George Washington and the Emoluments Clauses

 

[PoliticalChic]

You couldn't be more wrong.


Careful application of the English language.....of which, it appears, I am more facile than your are....even though English is not my first language....would indicate that the post showed that winning is all-important to the Soviet Communists, or Mao. Or Hitler.


The slaughter of millions indicates so.


Read more carefully in the future.


It also appears that allowing you to judge my writing would not be provident.

Nice try, but no cigar. Your opening statement smacked of propaganda that insults the mind. I was trained to resist inductive propaganda. So, I rejected yours. Effective propaganda starts not with a frontal assault, but by luring the susceptible in with comfortable truths before planting the seeds of half truths. You supported with a, b, c that were not clear unquestionable facts. I have not seen evidence that Democrats would ever try to (win) if you choose to call it that by killing millions. Your command of my native language is admirable, possibly more agile rather than facile. If I was briefly in your country (when I was much younger) I usually only knew enough language to navigate the transportation required, negotiate price of goods and order food when there wasn't an easily understood menu. I have learned much from people I considered less skilled. You might also.

BTW, love your avatar. she's hot. Did you know her? Did she shave her legs? And, just what is your native language?

I can't help you.....this is why you should have waited 'til at least the fifth grade to drop out.

Never asked you for help. Maybe you would be more effective from your native country if you aren't there right now.

She's as American as I am, buster. Consider yourself slapped with a pair of gloves on the chin.

Well hell ladies, have some apple pie and a saucer of milk. PMS much?

I love it when I've hurt a male who deserves it, and he is reduced to that juvenile jibe.

Time to hand out another trophy for “Not-Tonight-Dear,- I’ve-Got-A-Crushed-Ego.”

 

[GWV5903]

Maybe this will help you sonny
Trump’s Business Ties and the Problem With Emoluments

Is that your best shot? I suggest you search the WWW and find another source, even the WaPo supports his decision on this subject, grow up you petulant child...

 

[White 6]

Nice try, but no cigar. Your opening statement smacked of propaganda that insults the mind. I was trained to resist inductive propaganda. So, I rejected yours. Effective propaganda starts not with a frontal assault, but by luring the susceptible in with comfortable truths before planting the seeds of half truths. You supported with a, b, c that were not clear unquestionable facts. I have not seen evidence that Democrats would ever try to (win) if you choose to call it that by killing millions. Your command of my native language is admirable, possibly more agile rather than facile. If I was briefly in your country (when I was much younger) I usually only knew enough language to navigate the transportation required, negotiate price of goods and order food when there wasn't an easily understood menu. I have learned much from people I considered less skilled. You might also.

BTW, love your avatar. she's hot. Did you know her? Did she shave her legs? And, just what is your native language?

I can't help you.....this is why you should have waited 'til at least the fifth grade to drop out.

Never asked you for help. Maybe you would be more effective from your native country if you aren't there right now.

She's as American as I am, buster. Consider yourself slapped with a pair of gloves on the chin.

Well hell ladies, have some apple pie and a saucer of milk. PMS much?

I love it when I've hurt a male who deserves it, and he is reduced to that juvenile jibe.

Time to hand out another trophy for “Not-Tonight-Dear,- I’ve-Got-A-Crushed-Ego.”

boring zzz zzz. You two girls should get a room so you can give each other more than trophies on a message board, but lay off the sauce.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I can't help you.....this is why you should have waited 'til at least the fifth grade to drop out.

Never asked you for help. Maybe you would be more effective from your native country if you aren't there right now.

She's as American as I am, buster. Consider yourself slapped with a pair of gloves on the chin.

Well hell ladies, have some apple pie and a saucer of milk. PMS much?

I love it when I've hurt a male who deserves it, and he is reduced to that juvenile jibe.

Time to hand out another trophy for “Not-Tonight-Dear,- I’ve-Got-A-Crushed-Ego.”

boring zzz zzz. You two girls should get a room so you can give each other more than trophies on a message board, but lay off the sauce.

It's not workin,' dunce.

You wouldn't keep crawling back if I didn't get under your scales.


Welcome to Ouch-town, bro…Population: you

 

[PoliticalChic]

“(CNN)This week's deadly kosher market attack and the killing of a detective in New Jersey are being investigated as acts of domestic terrorism "fueled by both anti-Semitism and anti-law enforcement beliefs," the state attorney general said Thursday.
"We believe the suspects held views that reflected hatred of the Jewish people, as well as a hatred of law enforcement," New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal said, citing evidence and witness interviews.”
Jersey City shooters had hatred of Jews and law enforcement, state attorney general says - CNN


A careful reading of the CNN report reveals the attempt to hide the real basis of the killings.


“Black-Jewish Relations: … Anti-Semitism High in Black Community African-Americans continue to be significantly more likely than white Americans to hold anti-Jewish beliefs. As with whites, education level is the most important factor affecting the attitudes of blacks toward Jews.
Confirming the three previous studies, black Americans remain considerably more likely than white Americans to hold anti-Semitic views. In the 1998 survey, blacks (34%) are nearly four times as likely as whites (9%) to fall into the most anti-Semitic category.” ADL Survey Finds Anti-Semitism High in Black Community





15. “The news about one of the suspects in the Jersey City shooting at a kosher supermarket apparently having been a "Black Hebrew Israelite" who apparently"wrote anti-Semitic and anti-police posts," might surprise some who associate anti-Semitism with white nationalists and with extremist Islam or certain forms of Arab nationalism. But hostility to Jews seem to be materially more common among American blacks and American Hispanics than among American whites. “
"Anti-Semitic Propensities" by Race, According to the Anti-Defamation League


16. “approximately 12 percent of Americans hold deeply entrenched anti-Semitic views.” However, over 30% of African Americans and Latinos hold such views.
Given that they are almost 30% of the population, this suggests that of the 12% of Americans who hold deeply entrenched anti-Semitic views, 9% or so are African Americans or Latinos.
This means, in turn, of the 70% or so of the population that is not African American or Latino, only 3% hold deeply entrenched anti-Semitic views. Put another way, less than 5% of whites, Asians, and “others” (including Native Americans) combined hold deeply entrenched anti-Semitic views, compared to over 30% of African Americans and Latinos…”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...an-americans-common-among-blacks-and-latinos/



Now.....who do African Americans and Latinos feel most comfortable voting for????

That's right....Democrats.

 

[my2¢]

I'm not convinced that those spreading hateful ideology aren't the same ones perpetrating these hate crimes.

View attachment 294766

ADL H.E.A.T. Map

Could you define 'white supremacist'?

Yes.

Do so.....and you will prove there is no such thing, certainly no elected official on the Right.


Try.

Tell that to the Anti-Defamation League for it was them, not me, that referenced the group. And if you wish to challenge the ADL as a creditable source then your opening post is silly for referencing them both directly and indirectly through their citation as a source of information in article that you linked.

Meanwhile I'll continue to form my opinions based on news such as this: Pueblo man arrested, accused of planning synagogue bombing

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm not convinced that those spreading hateful ideology aren't the same ones perpetrating these hate crimes.

View attachment 294766

ADL H.E.A.T. Map

Could you define 'white supremacist'?

Yes.

Do so.....and you will prove there is no such thing, certainly no elected official on the Right.


Try.

Tell that to the Anti-Defamation League for it was them, not me, that referenced the group. And if you wish to challenge the ADL as a creditable source then your opening post is silly for referencing them both directly and indirectly through their citation as a source of information in article that you linked.

Meanwhile I'll continue to form my opinions based on news such as this: Pueblo man arrested, accused of planning synagogue bombing

You're the one who claimed you can define a term you used.

Clearly, you were lying.


I can.


Here's the point:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework



Happy to have provided you with the information you clearly lacked.

 

[edward37]

I'm not convinced that those spreading hateful ideology aren't the same ones perpetrating these hate crimes.

View attachment 294766

ADL H.E.A.T. Map

Could you define 'white supremacist'?

Yes.

Do so.....and you will prove there is no such thing, certainly no elected official on the Right.


Try.

Tell that to the Anti-Defamation League for it was them, not me, that referenced the group. And if you wish to challenge the ADL as a creditable source then your opening post is silly for referencing them both directly and indirectly through their citation as a source of information in article that you linked.

Meanwhile I'll continue to form my opinions based on news such as this: Pueblo man arrested, accused of planning synagogue bombing

You're the one who claimed you can define a term you used.

Clearly, you were lying.


I can.


Here's the point:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework



Happy to have provided you with the information you clearly lacked.

You win the Pinocchio award of the day PC ,,,Come on it's Sunday take a break lol

 

[PoliticalChic]

Could you define 'white supremacist'?

Yes.

Do so.....and you will prove there is no such thing, certainly no elected official on the Right.


Try.

Tell that to the Anti-Defamation League for it was them, not me, that referenced the group. And if you wish to challenge the ADL as a creditable source then your opening post is silly for referencing them both directly and indirectly through their citation as a source of information in article that you linked.

Meanwhile I'll continue to form my opinions based on news such as this: Pueblo man arrested, accused of planning synagogue bombing

You're the one who claimed you can define a term you used.

Clearly, you were lying.


I can.


Here's the point:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework



Happy to have provided you with the information you clearly lacked.

You win the Pinocchio award of the day PC ,,,Come on it's Sunday take a break lol

eddie, jot this down, as you seem to forget it from time to time......
a. I never lie

b. I'm never wrong.



Let's prove it together....
:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework




Now....if you have an example of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races".....let's hear it!


I bet you can't.



Have a good day, buddy.

 

[Mac1958]

Could you define 'white supremacist'?

Yes.

Do so.....and you will prove there is no such thing, certainly no elected official on the Right.


Try.

Tell that to the Anti-Defamation League for it was them, not me, that referenced the group. And if you wish to challenge the ADL as a creditable source then your opening post is silly for referencing them both directly and indirectly through their citation as a source of information in article that you linked.

Meanwhile I'll continue to form my opinions based on news such as this: Pueblo man arrested, accused of planning synagogue bombing

You're the one who claimed you can define a term you used.

Clearly, you were lying.


I can.


Here's the point:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework



Happy to have provided you with the information you clearly lacked.

You win the Pinocchio award of the day PC ,,,Come on it's Sunday take a break lol

The irony here is that people like this should be receiving Thank You cards on a daily basis from the hardcore Left.

These people not only enable the racism that still exists on the Right, they also enable those on the Left who push race too much, as well.

The Left can just point at people like this and say, "See?"

Of course, they don't and won't understand this, but they do make a fascinating study.
.

 

[edward37]

Yes.

Do so.....and you will prove there is no such thing, certainly no elected official on the Right.


Try.

Tell that to the Anti-Defamation League for it was them, not me, that referenced the group. And if you wish to challenge the ADL as a creditable source then your opening post is silly for referencing them both directly and indirectly through their citation as a source of information in article that you linked.

Meanwhile I'll continue to form my opinions based on news such as this: Pueblo man arrested, accused of planning synagogue bombing

You're the one who claimed you can define a term you used.

Clearly, you were lying.


I can.


Here's the point:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework



Happy to have provided you with the information you clearly lacked.

You win the Pinocchio award of the day PC ,,,Come on it's Sunday take a break lol

eddie, jot this down, as you seem to forget it from time to time......
a. I never lie

b. I'm never wrong.



Let's prove it together....
:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework




Now....if you have an example of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races".....let's hear it!


I bet you can't.



Have a good day, buddy.

PC always a pleasure reading your posts I love good fiction

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes.

Do so.....and you will prove there is no such thing, certainly no elected official on the Right.


Try.

Tell that to the Anti-Defamation League for it was them, not me, that referenced the group. And if you wish to challenge the ADL as a creditable source then your opening post is silly for referencing them both directly and indirectly through their citation as a source of information in article that you linked.

Meanwhile I'll continue to form my opinions based on news such as this: Pueblo man arrested, accused of planning synagogue bombing

You're the one who claimed you can define a term you used.

Clearly, you were lying.


I can.


Here's the point:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework



Happy to have provided you with the information you clearly lacked.

You win the Pinocchio award of the day PC ,,,Come on it's Sunday take a break lol

The irony here is that people like this should be receiving Thank You cards on a daily basis from the hardcore Left.

These people not only enable the racism that still exists on the Right, they also enable those on the Left who push race too much, as well.

The Left can just point at people like this and say, "See?"

Of course, they don't and won't understand this, but they do make a fascinating study.
.

Let's slice and dice this fence-sitter:


I always document my charges.....like this one: Winning is so important to the Democrat Party, that embracing anti-Semitism is more than acceptable, it is de rigueur.



a. In their plan to win elections, the Democrat tactic is to replace the American electorate with third-worlders, and illegal aliens, with their chief executive actually telling illegals ‘when you vote, you’re a citizen yourself.’

b. Ignoring the glaring difference between Sharia and our Constitution, the Democrat’s policy was to flood the nation with millions of unvetted Muslim refugees bred for warfare.

c. As they would never win a national election without the black vote, they and their media allies will never acknowledge an embedded evil in the African-American populace: anti-Semitism.

“Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D., Mich.) blamed "white supremacy" Thursday for a mass killing in New Jersey carried out by two black assailants, one of whom had ties to a nationalist hate group.” Tlaib Blames 'White Supremacy' for Anti-Semitic Murders Carried Out by Black Assailants

“AOC Tells Brits to Vote for Corbyn’s Labour Party”
AOC Tells Brits to Vote for Corbyn’s Labour Party


“Bernie and Corbyn are the same candidate—in all the wrong ways” Bernie and Corbyn are the same candidate—in all the wrong ways


“Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn Seeks Alliance With Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez”
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?


“One Third of Democrats Blame the Financial Crisis on the Jews"
One Third of Democrats Blame the Financial Crisis on the Jews - The Lid


Seven House Democrats Have Direct Ties To Notorious Anti-Semite [VIDEO]


Orders to bomb railroad tracks leading to the extermination camps were never given, although Nazi facilities merely five miles away were destroyed. And special American missions were launched to rescue art treasures – and performing Lipizzaner horses."
[But not Jews.]
Betrayal: FDR and the Jews




Democrats and anti-Semites.....hand and glove.



I notice that you were unable to refute any of the above.....or even respond to it, fence-sitter.

So did everyone else.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Orders to bomb railroad tracks leading to the extermination camps were never given, although Nazi facilities merely five miles away were destroyed. And special American missions were launched to rescue art treasures – and performing Lipizzaner horses."
[But not Jews.]
Betrayal: FDR and the Jews




Democrats and anti-Semites.....hand and glove.



I notice that you were unable to refute any of the above.....or even respond to it, fence-sitter.

So did everyone else.

 

[Redfish]

Do so.....and you will prove there is no such thing, certainly no elected official on the Right.


Try.

Tell that to the Anti-Defamation League for it was them, not me, that referenced the group. And if you wish to challenge the ADL as a creditable source then your opening post is silly for referencing them both directly and indirectly through their citation as a source of information in article that you linked.

Meanwhile I'll continue to form my opinions based on news such as this: Pueblo man arrested, accused of planning synagogue bombing

You're the one who claimed you can define a term you used.

Clearly, you were lying.


I can.


Here's the point:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework



Happy to have provided you with the information you clearly lacked.

You win the Pinocchio award of the day PC ,,,Come on it's Sunday take a break lol

eddie, jot this down, as you seem to forget it from time to time......
a. I never lie

b. I'm never wrong.



Let's prove it together....
:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework




Now....if you have an example of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races".....let's hear it!


I bet you can't.

PC what I don't get is a fellow Brooklynite can be taken in ,so supportive of this garbage in our WH You say you're never wrong I beg your pardon but you are wrong in your support for trump

Have a good day, buddy.

give it up, eddie. PC has destroyed you once again, but you are free to continue to prove your stupidity if you choose.

 

[edward37]

Tell that to the Anti-Defamation League for it was them, not me, that referenced the group. And if you wish to challenge the ADL as a creditable source then your opening post is silly for referencing them both directly and indirectly through their citation as a source of information in article that you linked.

Meanwhile I'll continue to form my opinions based on news such as this: Pueblo man arrested, accused of planning synagogue bombing

You're the one who claimed you can define a term you used.

Clearly, you were lying.


I can.


Here's the point:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework



Happy to have provided you with the information you clearly lacked.

You win the Pinocchio award of the day PC ,,,Come on it's Sunday take a break lol

eddie, jot this down, as you seem to forget it from time to time......
a. I never lie

b. I'm never wrong.



Let's prove it together....
:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework




Now....if you have an example of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races".....let's hear it!


I bet you can't.

PC what I don't get is a fellow Brooklynite can be taken in ,so supportive of this garbage in our WH You say you're never wrong I beg your pardon but you are wrong in your support for trump

Have a good day, buddy.

give it up, eddie. PC has destroyed you once again, but you are free to continue to prove your stupidity if you choose.

Red PC is wrong Wrong about many things she posts ,wrong about any support for this garbage in our WH Trump is wrong for America a blustering bullying lying cheating crook is what we have in our WH now and folks like you approve SAD

 

[Redfish]

You're the one who claimed you can define a term you used.

Clearly, you were lying.


I can.


Here's the point:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework



Happy to have provided you with the information you clearly lacked.

You win the Pinocchio award of the day PC ,,,Come on it's Sunday take a break lol

eddie, jot this down, as you seem to forget it from time to time......
a. I never lie

b. I'm never wrong.



Let's prove it together....
:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework




Now....if you have an example of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races".....let's hear it!


I bet you can't.

PC what I don't get is a fellow Brooklynite can be taken in ,so supportive of this garbage in our WH You say you're never wrong I beg your pardon but you are wrong in your support for trump

Have a good day, buddy.

give it up, eddie. PC has destroyed you once again, but you are free to continue to prove your stupidity if you choose.

Red PC is wrong Wrong about many things she posts ,wrong about any support for this garbage in our WH Trump is wrong for America a blustering bullying lying cheating crook is what we have in our WH now and folks like you approve SAD

you have yet to prove her wrong on any point.

Trump talks like real americans talk, he tells it like it is. Thats why he will win a landslide next year. Americans appreciate someone who talks like they do and shares their values. Unlike any of the dem clown pretenders to the crown.

 

[edward37]

You win the Pinocchio award of the day PC ,,,Come on it's Sunday take a break lol

eddie, jot this down, as you seem to forget it from time to time......
a. I never lie

b. I'm never wrong.



Let's prove it together....
:.....there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.


Let's prove it:
There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"

There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

The real reason the Democrat push this bogus view is that without the black vote, they would never win a national election.....and, if it causes division and violence...that Party couldn't care less.



"Liberals lie all the time, but when they know they're vulnerable they lie even more than all the time. They're vulnerable on immigration. Even heroic, nonstop lying doesn't help -- as CNN has discovered.

So, naturally, the media have turned to their larger project of relentlessly trying to discredit conservatives as "white supremacists."
White Supremacists Ate My Homework




Now....if you have an example of any American leaders, officials, in elected offices, whether white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races".....let's hear it!


I bet you can't.

PC what I don't get is a fellow Brooklynite can be taken in ,so supportive of this garbage in our WH You say you're never wrong I beg your pardon but you are wrong in your support for trump

Have a good day, buddy.

give it up, eddie. PC has destroyed you once again, but you are free to continue to prove your stupidity if you choose.

Red PC is wrong Wrong about many things she posts ,wrong about any support for this garbage in our WH Trump is wrong for America a blustering bullying lying cheating crook is what we have in our WH now and folks like you approve SAD

you have yet to prove her wrong on any point.

Trump talks like real americans talk, he tells it like it is. Thats why he will win a landslide next year. Americans appreciate someone who talks like they do and shares their values. Unlike any of the dem clown pretenders to the crown.

Real Americans know what garbage trump is Sorry ,you don't qualify

 

[Bush92]

…then, how can one criticize the Soviet Communists, or Mao,. Or Hitler????

And for the Democrat Party….winning is the only thing that counts.




1.There are several aspects of Democrat’s ‘yellow brick road’ that support the above conclusion.

a. In their plan to win elections, the Democrat tactic is to replace the American electorate with third-worlders, and illegal aliens, with their chief executive actually telling illegals ‘when you vote, you’re a citizen yourself.’

b. Ignoring the glaring difference between Sharia and our Constitution, the Democrat’s policy was to flood the nation with millions of unvetted Muslim refugees bred for warfare.

c. As they would never win a national election without the black vote, they and their media allies will never acknowledge an embedded evil in the African-American populace: anti-Semitism.




2. Counting on the historic affiliation of American Jews and the Democrat Party, clearly unwavering no matter how insulting the Party is to their Jewish voters, the Democrats have openly allied themselves with anti-Jewish groups no matter their hue.

3. “In its annual Hate Crime Statistics Act report, the FBI found …. 57% of those religious hate crimes - 920 overall - were motivated by offenders’ anti-Jewish bias, the FBI said. A record number of anti-Jewish crimes were violent in nature - 105 in total, up from 73 in 2017.

According to the Anti-Defamation League, Jews have been the most common victims of religiously-motivated hate crimes every year since the FBI began such reports in 1991. Fifteen percent of religiously-motivated hate crimes were victims of anti-Muslim bias…” Jews Were Victims Of More Than Half Of All Religious Hate Crimes: FBI




4. “(CNN)This week's deadly kosher market attack and the killing of a detective in New Jersey are being investigated as acts of domestic terrorism "fueled by both anti-Semitism and anti-law enforcement beliefs," the state attorney general said Thursday.

"We believe the suspects held views that reflected hatred of the Jewish people, as well as a hatred of law enforcement," New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal said, citing evidence and witness interviews.”
Jersey City shooters had hatred of Jews and law enforcement, state attorney general says - CNN


A careful reading of the CNN report reveals the attempt to hide the real basis of the killings.


5. “Black-Jewish Relations: … Anti-Semitism High in Black Community African-Americans continue to be significantly more likely than white Americans to hold anti-Jewish beliefs. As with whites, education level is the most important factor affecting the attitudes of blacks toward Jews.

Confirming the three previous studies, black Americans remain considerably more likely than white Americans to hold anti-Semitic views. In the 1998 survey, blacks (34%) are nearly four times as likely as whites (9%) to fall into the most anti-Semitic category.” ADL Survey Finds Anti-Semitism High in Black Community




Revealing and opposing this fact might impinge on the Democrat electoral victories.

And for the Democrat Party….winning is the only thing that counts.

The Democratic Party strategy is to divide America based on race, income, and gender.