The claim that Kavanaugh lied is political spin. Yes, I would support his nomination, especially since Schumer, Pelosi, and Feinstein publicly declared they would do ANYTHING to Obstruct what Trump wants to do....and based on the fact that Ford's 1 and only eye witness - the guy she says stopped the rape - has declared IT NEVER HAPPENED.
WHY ARE PEOPLE WHO DON'T BELIEVE SOMETHING EXISTS SO THREATENED / OFFENDED BY IT?
You're really saying that if a Democrat were accused of this, and the accuser had years of therapist's notes on it, you'd brush it off and blame the accuser?Who said anything about "getting Trump"? I mentioned the opportunity for fame and fortune, as in "Hey I went to High School with that SCOTUS nominee! I betcha I can get on Oprah if I say he ….. " , goes to motive your honor.If she has notes from many years, then she didn't make it up to get Trump.I have many years of notes with a therapist detailing how the notes with her therapist are just made up nonsense, wanna buy some?
Anybody that waits 35 years to make accusations public just when it happens that doing so offers the opportunity for fame and fortune has no credibility, regardless of what his/her shrink says.
.. tough shit, next case.
No it wouldn't, in case you haven't heard, it's not exactly uncommon for people to tell THERAPISTS all sorts of crazy nonsense that isn't based on reality.
Telling your shrink a bunch of shit isn't evidence of anything other than the fact that you told your shrink a bunch of shit. "Damning evidence" would be some form of physical evidence or impartial eye witness testimony, given that this dingbat waited 35 years to put forward the accusations publicly it might be a bit difficult to find any of that.
.
Yeah, doesn't matter to me if the accused is a douche bag-R or a douche bag-D, the circumstances don't warrant taking the accusation seriously.
If it did, and Kananaugh has lied, would you still support his nomination?
There is no 'concession'. I didn't even understand the gibberish you posted. As usual, snowflakes are rambling and making no sense....THAT is why I am IGNORING you, not conceding anything. (Which is also proof that you either can't read, can't comprehend simple statements, or spin the hell out of everything, which is another great reason to ignore you.)
The Left’s use of baseless lies against political foes is nothing new. They’ve been doing it for decades. The problem is the current collusion between the Left and the Leftist Media.
It’s imperative now that Brett Kavanaugh be confirmed, and not only because of the stakes for the Supreme Court.
Yes, we’re going to find ourselves in quite a pickle if President Trump has to choose another nominee so close to the mid-term elections, and we’re looking at the possibility of a Democrat Senate next year that won’t confirm anyone he nominates – unless it’s someone chosen from a pre-approved list Charles Schumer helpfully provides.
You can be sure there will be no crossover between that list and the one from the Federalist Society.
But there’s a more important reason than that. If the last-minute attacks on Kavanaugh are rewarded with the scuttling of his nomination, there will be no restraint left on anyone to lodge any smear – no matter how ancient, scurrilous or unsubstantiated it may be – against anyone, ever again.
Much more @ If this accusation takes Kavanaugh down, no one will be safe from baseless smears again
not offended at all. i was born and raised roman catholic and for my own reasons, i've gone my own way. however, i still fully respect those who choose to believe and their reasons why.
The Left’s use of baseless lies against political foes is nothing new. They’ve been doing it for decades. The problem is the current collusion between the Left and the Leftist Media.
It’s imperative now that Brett Kavanaugh be confirmed, and not only because of the stakes for the Supreme Court.
Yes, we’re going to find ourselves in quite a pickle if President Trump has to choose another nominee so close to the mid-term elections, and we’re looking at the possibility of a Democrat Senate next year that won’t confirm anyone he nominates – unless it’s someone chosen from a pre-approved list Charles Schumer helpfully provides.
You can be sure there will be no crossover between that list and the one from the Federalist Society.
But there’s a more important reason than that. If the last-minute attacks on Kavanaugh are rewarded with the scuttling of his nomination, there will be no restraint left on anyone to lodge any smear – no matter how ancient, scurrilous or unsubstantiated it may be – against anyone, ever again.
Much more @ If this accusation takes Kavanaugh down, no one will be safe from baseless smears again
You're disgusting. character assassination is bad enough, but to put partisanship before country is deplorable.
In context, McConnell's misfeasance in not bringing forward President Obama's nominee based on the excuse it was too close to a national election, is doubled down by you and the GOP who argue times are different and Trump's nominee must be vetted and approved before the next national election.
oh but her potential character assasination is cool with you.
No it's not "cool with" me. The allegation is not beyond the realm of reality, nor is the nominees denial.
The issue is not settled, the allegation must be taken seriously. As the lady said, each partisan side will argue differently, but there is no evidence yet in which I'm aware, presented, to tilt the issue to one side or the other.
As a former manager of Domestic Violence coalitions I've seen my share of :He said, She said: situations. Somewhere there will be evidence for the trier of facts - in this case the Senate - to make a judgment.
If the event occurred as stated by the alleged victim, what he did at 17 is not as relevant to the nomination as If he lied about it, if so, he should be denied the nomination.
What is this about "lying about it?" How could he have lied to the Senate about something he didn't know existed until this past week? Is this a projection, if he is later somehow found to have done this?
Why aren't democrats believing Keith Ellison's accuser?The Left’s use of baseless lies against political foes is nothing new. They’ve been doing it for decades. The problem is the current collusion between the Left and the Leftist Media.
It’s imperative now that Brett Kavanaugh be confirmed, and not only because of the stakes for the Supreme Court.
Yes, we’re going to find ourselves in quite a pickle if President Trump has to choose another nominee so close to the mid-term elections, and we’re looking at the possibility of a Democrat Senate next year that won’t confirm anyone he nominates – unless it’s someone chosen from a pre-approved list Charles Schumer helpfully provides.
You can be sure there will be no crossover between that list and the one from the Federalist Society.
But there’s a more important reason than that. If the last-minute attacks on Kavanaugh are rewarded with the scuttling of his nomination, there will be no restraint left on anyone to lodge any smear – no matter how ancient, scurrilous or unsubstantiated it may be – against anyone, ever again.
Much more @ If this accusation takes Kavanaugh down, no one will be safe from baseless smears again
You're disgusting. character assassination is bad enough, but to put partisanship before country is deplorable.
In context, McConnell's misfeasance in not bringing forward President Obama's nominee based on the excuse it was too close to a national election, is doubled down by you and the GOP who argue times are different and Trump's nominee must be vetted and approved before the next national election.
oh but her potential character assasination is cool with you.
No it's not "cool with" me. The allegation is not beyond the realm of reality, nor is the nominees denial.
The issue is not settled, the allegation must be taken seriously. As the lady said, each partisan side will argue differently, but there is no evidence yet in which I'm aware, presented, to tilt the issue to one side or the other.
As a former manager of Domestic Violence coalitions I've seen my share of :He said, She said: situations. Somewhere there will be evidence for the trier of facts - in this case the Senate - to make a judgment.
If the event occurred as stated by the alleged victim, what he did at 17 is not as relevant to the nomination as If he lied about it, if so, he should be denied the nomination.
What is this about "lying about it?" How could he have lied to the Senate about something he didn't know existed until this past week? Is this a projection, if he is later somehow found to have done this?
A lie is an attempt to mislead someone, in this case the public. Keep in mind, the Clinton Impeachment was based on something Jones said, and later morphed into the Lewinsky matter. Clinton was impeached for his effort to mislead authority.
Being drunk and in a black out does not excuse any crime committed in the eyes of the law. Kavanaugh's response was "no way, no how" that any such event happened.
Time will tell what the Senate decides, but given McConnell's latest comments, parties come first (he will protect this wife's job, his leadership and his party as jobs # 1, 2 & 3). Country First has always been only a talking point for him.
Men who abuse women are shaking shaking shaking.The Left’s use of baseless lies against political foes is nothing new. They’ve been doing it for decades. The problem is the current collusion between the Left and the Leftist Media.
It’s imperative now that Brett Kavanaugh be confirmed, and not only because of the stakes for the Supreme Court.
Yes, we’re going to find ourselves in quite a pickle if President Trump has to choose another nominee so close to the mid-term elections, and we’re looking at the possibility of a Democrat Senate next year that won’t confirm anyone he nominates – unless it’s someone chosen from a pre-approved list Charles Schumer helpfully provides.
You can be sure there will be no crossover between that list and the one from the Federalist Society.
But there’s a more important reason than that. If the last-minute attacks on Kavanaugh are rewarded with the scuttling of his nomination, there will be no restraint left on anyone to lodge any smear – no matter how ancient, scurrilous or unsubstantiated it may be – against anyone, ever again.
Much more @ If this accusation takes Kavanaugh down, no one will be safe from baseless smears again
Why aren't democrats believing Keith Ellison's accuser?Men who abuse women are shaking shaking shaking.The Left’s use of baseless lies against political foes is nothing new. They’ve been doing it for decades. The problem is the current collusion between the Left and the Leftist Media.
It’s imperative now that Brett Kavanaugh be confirmed, and not only because of the stakes for the Supreme Court.
Yes, we’re going to find ourselves in quite a pickle if President Trump has to choose another nominee so close to the mid-term elections, and we’re looking at the possibility of a Democrat Senate next year that won’t confirm anyone he nominates – unless it’s someone chosen from a pre-approved list Charles Schumer helpfully provides.
You can be sure there will be no crossover between that list and the one from the Federalist Society.
But there’s a more important reason than that. If the last-minute attacks on Kavanaugh are rewarded with the scuttling of his nomination, there will be no restraint left on anyone to lodge any smear – no matter how ancient, scurrilous or unsubstantiated it may be – against anyone, ever again.
Much more @ If this accusation takes Kavanaugh down, no one will be safe from baseless smears again
Speaking of Dis-Information Campaigns / Counter-Intelligence Operations....Thank you for that great example of 'LYING'.
Her story / this event can not be used to their party's advantage; therefore, it is a non-story, to be rejected.
Men who abuse women are shaking shaking shaking.The Left’s use of baseless lies against political foes is nothing new. They’ve been doing it for decades. The problem is the current collusion between the Left and the Leftist Media.
It’s imperative now that Brett Kavanaugh be confirmed, and not only because of the stakes for the Supreme Court.
Yes, we’re going to find ourselves in quite a pickle if President Trump has to choose another nominee so close to the mid-term elections, and we’re looking at the possibility of a Democrat Senate next year that won’t confirm anyone he nominates – unless it’s someone chosen from a pre-approved list Charles Schumer helpfully provides.
You can be sure there will be no crossover between that list and the one from the Federalist Society.
But there’s a more important reason than that. If the last-minute attacks on Kavanaugh are rewarded with the scuttling of his nomination, there will be no restraint left on anyone to lodge any smear – no matter how ancient, scurrilous or unsubstantiated it may be – against anyone, ever again.
Much more @ If this accusation takes Kavanaugh down, no one will be safe from baseless smears again
