If there is a war with Iran it would have to be fought quickly...


20 years spinning our wheels and wasting trillions of dollars. Iraq is not a better place today than it was under Saddam.
It’s different not better but the leaders of Iran must fear ending up like him or Gaddafi. They know the US can eliminate leaders.

But it benefits us none so what is the point? Why? It's going to come back on us sooner or later.
Because he was planning other attacks. If the regime knows we will retaliate they will reduce terror actions. Clinton could have killed bin laddin but chose your strategy of “why” and you saw firsthand why.
 
What happened in Iraq?

20 years spinning our wheels and wasting trillions of dollars. Iraq is not a better place today than it was under Saddam.
It’s different not better but the leaders of Iran must fear ending up like him or Gaddafi. They know the US can eliminate leaders.

But it benefits us none so what is the point? Why? It's going to come back on us sooner or later.
Because he was planning other attacks. If the regime knows we will retaliate they will reduce terror actions. Clinton could have killed bin laddin but chose your strategy of “why” and you saw firsthand why.

We had NO business still being in Iraq in the capacity we are. We were lied to. How many lies will you simply accept?
 
What happened in Iraq?

20 years spinning our wheels and wasting trillions of dollars. Iraq is not a better place today than it was under Saddam.
It’s different not better but the leaders of Iran must fear ending up like him or Gaddafi. They know the US can eliminate leaders.

But it benefits us none so what is the point? Why? It's going to come back on us sooner or later.
Because he was planning other attacks. If the regime knows we will retaliate they will reduce terror actions. Clinton could have killed bin laddin but chose your strategy of “why” and you saw firsthand why.

We had NO business still being in Iraq in the capacity we are. We were lied to. How many lies will you simply accept?
I agree we should have left
 
Nuking Tehran on day one would make it short and sweet.
Which would entail the fiery deaths of millions of innocent people of all ages for absolutely no reason but the thirst of a few paltry human beings for power.
 
My reply was about it being over in a hurry. Almost 20 years later it's still not over.
When you go to war you can't surrender just because we're still there 10 or 15 years later.
 
The plan would be to kill the Islamist leaders and let the people decide their new leadership.
It's never worked anywhere else, why would it here?
Some people in third world countries are not smart enough to select their own leaders.
We aren’t the world police
Apparently...to con-servative republican christians...we are. Actually, anyone trying to push WWIII because of their misguided religious belief in The End Times is a terrorist.
 
The plan would be to kill the Islamist leaders and let the people decide their new leadership.


"The plan would be to kill the Islamist leaders and let the people decide their new leadership"

I see,

The same plan that never worked in the ME before.


good idea.
 
We couldn't have a long build-up like we did in the days before the Gulf War and the Iraq War.

We'd have to have the element of surprise.

Targeting and killing Iran's leadership would help create the chaos necessary for a swift victory.
why? why no build up?

It takes months and eliminates the element of surprise.
 
We c
...with a first strike on anything the Iranians have that might have nuclear capabilities.

We could likely turn that entire shithole into molten glass in two days tops.

Do you shitheads not understand the downside of nuclear weapons? If you did, you would not be posting idiocy like that.
 
We have forces parked in Afghanistan, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Turkey, Qatar, and Muscat. It doesn't seem to have brought much peace or stability to the region or acted as much of a deterrent.

It's hard to say what might have happened if we had not been there all these years.

Having armored divisions and infantry divisions, etc., on the ground right next door in Iraq would most assuredly give the Iranian regime second thoughts.

Why would we need armor or infantry if we are not going to invade?
 
We had NO business still being in Iraq in the capacity we are.

I agree we should have left

The Iraqi's want us out....

“One sure result of the U.S. strike is that the era of U.S.-Iraq cooperation is over,” Richard N. Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations and a former American diplomat, wrote on Twitter.

A Shocked Iraq Reconsiders Its Relationship With the U.S.

~S~

SOME Iraqis want us out.

There! I fixed your error.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom