If There Had Been No Democrat Party

[PoliticalChic]

It is instructive to weigh the cost of whatever positives the Democrat Party has provided against the iniquities that our society has had to accepts.
Then, one can decide which predominates.



1. No Civil War, at least 620,000 combatants died during the four-year struggle.....No James Buchanan, finding that slaves are property, ...no LBJ creating a separate class of Americans based on skin color.



2. No bizarre 56 genders,...."They said they just wanted gay marriage, now we’re being told to accept child drag queens, incest and bestiality" They said they just wanted gay marriage, now we're being told to accept child drag queens, incest and bestiality · Caldron Pool



3. No destruction of the family, no attacks on the concept of marriage,...
"America Has World’s Highest Rate of Single-Parent Households"
https://freebeacon.com/issues/america-has-worlds-highest-rate-of-single-parent-households/



4. No Franklin Roosevelt, and therefore, no Soviet Union, no Red China, no Korean War, no Vietnam war



5. No Jimmy Carter, and hence, no Ayatollah controlled Iran.



Wow......could you imagine.


Sadly....
This only is denied to God: the power to undo the past.
Agathon, from Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics

 

[anynameyouwish]

It is instructive to weigh the cost of whatever positives the Democrat Party has provided against the iniquities that our society has had to accepts.
Then, one can decide which predominates.



1. No Civil War, at least 620,000 combatants died during the four-year struggle.....No James Buchanan, finding that slaves are property, ...no LBJ creating a separate class of Americans based on skin color.



2. No bizarre 56 genders,...."They said they just wanted gay marriage, now we’re being told to accept child drag queens, incest and bestiality" They said they just wanted gay marriage, now we're being told to accept child drag queens, incest and bestiality · Caldron Pool



3. No destruction of the family, no attacks on the concept of marriage,...
"America Has World’s Highest Rate of Single-Parent Households"
https://freebeacon.com/issues/america-has-worlds-highest-rate-of-single-parent-households/


4. No Franklin Roosevelt, and therefore, no Soviet Union, no Red China, no Korean War, no Vietnamese war



5. No Jimmy Carter, and hence, no Ayatollah controlled Iran.



Wow......could you imagine.


Sadly....
This only is denied to God: the power to undo the past.
Agathon, from Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics

are you working on a comedy routine or have you become verifiably insane?

no, I won't debate any of your HYPOTHETICAL lunacies.

 

[rightwinger]

No Democratic Party

No Social Security
No Medicare
No Obamacare
No Worker protections

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is instructive to weigh the cost of whatever positives the Democrat Party has provided against the iniquities that our society has had to accepts.
Then, one can decide which predominates.



1. No Civil War, at least 620,000 combatants died during the four-year struggle.....No James Buchanan, finding that slaves are property, ...no LBJ creating a separate class of Americans based on skin color.



2. No bizarre 56 genders,...."They said they just wanted gay marriage, now we’re being told to accept child drag queens, incest and bestiality" They said they just wanted gay marriage, now we're being told to accept child drag queens, incest and bestiality · Caldron Pool



3. No destruction of the family, no attacks on the concept of marriage,...
"America Has World’s Highest Rate of Single-Parent Households"
https://freebeacon.com/issues/america-has-worlds-highest-rate-of-single-parent-households/


4. No Franklin Roosevelt, and therefore, no Soviet Union, no Red China, no Korean War, no Vietnamese war



5. No Jimmy Carter, and hence, no Ayatollah controlled Iran.



Wow......could you imagine.


Sadly....
This only is denied to God: the power to undo the past.
Agathon, from Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics

are you working on a comedy routine or have you become verifiably insane?

no, I won't debate any of your HYPOTHETICAL lunacies.

We both know there is nothing in that post that you can refute.....but, I am pleased that it put a burr under your saddle, you donkey.


As always, everything I post is 100% accurate, true and correct.

Inadvertently, you've helped prove it, mud.


Move on.

 

[Gdjjr]

4. No Franklin Roosevelt, and therefore, no Soviet Union, no Red China, no Korean War, no Vietnam war



5. No Jimmy Carter, and hence, no Ayatollah controlled Iran.

Curious how you came to the above conclusions- the "communist threat" was started by Dulles, under Ike- the CIA coup in Iran was in 1953- Ike was POTUS- Dulles was in charge of the CIA- Ike threatened Korea with a Nuclear attack-

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. No Franklin Roosevelt, and therefore, no Soviet Union, no Red China, no Korean War, no Vietnam war



5. No Jimmy Carter, and hence, no Ayatollah controlled Iran.

Curious how you came to the above conclusions- the "communist threat" was started by Dulles, under Ike- the CIA coup in Iran was in 1953- Ike was POTUS- Dulles was in charge of the CIA- Ike threatened Korea with a Nuclear attack-

Wrong again.

Are you claiming that there was no 'communist threat'????

That would reveal you a dunce.



You see, Roosevelt's New Deal was riddled with communists....paid agents of Stalin.

At a dinner party, a number administration officials spilled the beans, spoke openly about the plans to cause a revolution so they can rebuild America in the Soviet's image.

"Wirt claimed he had "discovered" evidence of a plot within FDR's administration to launch a Bolshevik takeover of the United States..... garnering all kind of media attention, and even testifying before Congress about his evidence of a "concrete plan" for the overthrow of the U.S. government crafted by members of FDR's "Brain Trusters."

"Roosevelt is only the Kerensky of this revolution," he quoted them. (Kerensky was the provisional leader of Russia just before the 1917 Bolshevik revolution.) The hoodwinked president would be permitted to stay in office, they said, "until we are ready to supplant him with a Stalin."
The familiar tale of William A. Wirt | Washington Monthly



I hope you are bright enough to thank me for the education I provide you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. No Franklin Roosevelt, and therefore, no Soviet Union, no Red China, no Korean War, no Vietnam war



5. No Jimmy Carter, and hence, no Ayatollah controlled Iran.

Curious how you came to the above conclusions- the "communist threat" was started by Dulles, under Ike- the CIA coup in Iran was in 1953- Ike was POTUS- Dulles was in charge of the CIA- Ike threatened Korea with a Nuclear attack-

"under Ike- the CIA coup in Iran was in 1953- Ike was POTUS- Dulles was in charge of the CIA-"


Wrong again....see, this is the result of your dropping out of school in the third grade.

Take notes.

Dr. Abbas Milani is he Director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. His recent book is “The Shah,” is based on ten years studying the archives of the United States and of Britain. The following is from his recent lecture on that subject.


1. The event that has come to define perceptions of U.S. meddling is the coup that ejected the popularly elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953. Both former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and President Obama have acknowledged America’s role in the coup in speeches that were widely taken to be apologies. http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

2. Prior to 1951, Britain controlled Iran’s oil industry. The US foresaw how the one-sided dominance would result in a nationalist uprising, and warned Britain, but they refused to alter the agreements, claiming that they knew how to deal with the ‘natives.’

a. Mossedeq was the nationalist leader of the Iranian Parliament, becoming so via democratic process, and the first thing he did was nationalize the oil industry. Britain wanted to attack Iran, but Truman wouldn’t allow it. Then the Brits tried to get the Shah to use the army to throw Mossadeq out…but the Shah refused to do anything illegal.

3. When the communists attacked Mossadeq, the nationalists, the middle class, the merchants and even a broad swath of clerics—Islamists such as Ayatollah Abolgasem Kashani, a mentor of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—had initially supported Mossadegh.

4. But by November of ’52, try as they may, the US could not make a deal with Mossadeq, who demanded 100% control of oil, which would never be accepted by Britain. The US began to agree with overthrowing the Prime Minister.

a. The power of the communists was increasing in Iran…and the economy suffered a downturn. Both factors caused a loss of popular support for Mossadeq- but due to the loss of support, he felt the need to gravitate toward the communists. This scared off the clergy.

b. Brits and the US began to send in agents provocateurs to act as communists to further cause rifts between the clergy and Mossadeq.

c. As compensation for his support, Ayatollah Kashani began to demand veto rights on legislation, and Islamic laws, and laws against Baha’is. Mossadeq refused, and lost the cleric’s support.

1. Due to the unrest and criticisms, Mossadeq decided to dismiss the parliament; without any constitutional or legal basis. His supporters warned him that this would allow the Shah to make recess appointments, including the Prime Ministers. He didn’t believe that the Shah would do it….he was wrong. On August 13th, 1953 the Shah signed the decree which removed Mossadeq with General Fazollah Zehedi. “When pro-Shah soldiers went to arrest Mossadegh, they instead were captured.” http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue51/articles/51_14-15.pdf The Shah fled to Rome.
2. By August 19th, crowds filled the streets, attacked Mossadeq’s home, and took over the radio station. The question is whether these crowds were simply concerned Iranians, nationalists, communists, as the Shah’s supporters claimed, or paid CIA operatives, and the CIA claims.

a. Professor Milani, using the latest declassified archival documents, suggests two things: a) the crowds were combinations of both, and b) “Although declassified CIA documents confirmed many details of his account, which Roosevelt told with the relish of a John le Carré thriller, his version was exceptionally self-serving. For instance, despite knowing little about Iranian society and speaking no Persian, Roosevelt launched by his own description an instantly potent propaganda campaign. Dwight Eisenhower, president during the 1953 coup, was to characterize Roosevelt’s report as seeming “more like a dime novel.” The CIA claimed more power that it actually had.
http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/5280

 

[rightwinger]

God Bless the Democratic Party and all they do for us!

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. No Franklin Roosevelt, and therefore, no Soviet Union, no Red China, no Korean War, no Vietnam war



5. No Jimmy Carter, and hence, no Ayatollah controlled Iran.

Curious how you came to the above conclusions- the "communist threat" was started by Dulles, under Ike- the CIA coup in Iran was in 1953- Ike was POTUS- Dulles was in charge of the CIA- Ike threatened Korea with a Nuclear attack-

" Ike threatened Korea with a Nuclear attack-"

You're quite the compendium or Leftist babble, aren't you.



Franklin Roosevelt welcomed Stalin's spies into his administration.
The result was that he provided Stalin with the atomic bomb......even before Truman even knew about the bomb.

"Absent an atomic bomb, Stalin would not have released Pyongyang's army to conquer the entire Korean peninsula. Confident that his possession of atomic weapons neutralized America's strategic advantage, Stalin was emboldened to unleash war in Korea in 1950."
Haynes, Klehr, and
Vassiliev, "Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America," p. 143, 545. And Romerstein and Breindel,"The Venona Secrets," p. xv, 253.



How do you get through life knowing as little as you do????


Do you have a keeper????

 

[rightwinger]

Another Great Democrat!

 

[rightwinger]

More GREAT Democrats......The GREAT Obama

 

[rightwinger]

What Republicans gave us

 

[NightFox]

God Bless the Democratic Party and all they do for us!

Let me guess, you graduated at the top of your class from the political re-education camp.

One normally has to visit a Scientologist Convention to witness that degree of brainwashing.

 

[jwoodie]

Another Great Democrat!

View attachment 295051

Care to list his accomplishments?

 

[rightwinger]

God Bless the Democratic Party and all they do for us!

Let me guess, you graduated at the top of your class from the political re-education camp.

One normally has to visit a Scientologist Convention to witness that degree of brainwashing.

FDR is universally accepted as our greatest modern President. Even among conservative scholars

 

[PoliticalChic]

Another Great Democrat!

View attachment 295051

Care to list his accomplishments?

Ooooo....oooo.......call on me!!!!!!!!!!!!!


After we strip away the hagiography provided by the Democrat media arm, we find this:


Democrat telling of history marks the Cuban Missile Crisis as the singular achievement of John F. Kennedy.
Yet, it is a primary example of the Left's hagiography: telling half the truth about their heroes.


Here, a more important telling of half-truths: The Cuban Missile Crisis.
"Many contemporary observers applauded Kennedy for standing up to the Soviet Union. His insistence that Soviet missiles be dismantled and taken away from Cuba earned him widespread support. Those nuclear weapons were a direct threat to American cities."
The National Archives | Heroes & Villains | Kennedy & Cuba

Here's the truth:
John Kennedy was as much the cause of the crisis as the hero.

“The purpose right now is to show that you are glossing over Kennedy. You are airbrushing the bad things,” Elder answers." Larry Elder Hammers Chris Matthews in Agonizing Interview: ‘I’m Sorry For Cutting You Off the Way You Cut Your Guests Off’




Time-line

a. The Vienna summit was a summit meeting held on June 4, 1961, in Vienna, Austria, between President John F. Kennedy of the United States and Premier Nikita Khrushchev of the Soviet Union. Vienna summit - Wikipedia

b." In May 1962, Khrushchev announced to the Politburo his secret plan to put Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba." Cuban Missile Crisis: Kennedy's Mistakes

c. October, 1962....Cuban Missile Crisis



In fact, that Khrushchev swept the floor with cowed Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis was mainstream conservative conclusion throughout much of the Cold War. Richard Nixon and Barry Goldwater, for instance, represented opposite poles of the Republican establishment of their time.

"Kennedy pulled defeat out of the jaws of victory,” complained Richard Nixon. "Then gave the Soviets squatters rights in our backyard." 'The Biggest Defeat in Our Nation’s History'—The Cuban Missile Crisis

"It's a public relations fable that Khrushchev quailed before Kennedy," wrote Alexander Haig. "The legend of the eyeball to eyeball confrontation invented by Kennedy's men paid a handsome political dividend. But the Kennedy-Khrushchev deal was a deplorable error resulting in political havoc and human suffering through the America's."

William Buckley's National Review devoted several issues to exposing and denouncing Kennedy's appeasement. The magazine's popular "The Third World War" column by James Burnham roundly condemned Kennedy's Missile Crisis solution as "America's Defeat."



Even Democratic luminary Dean Acheson despaired: "This nation lacks leadership," he grumbled about the famous “Ex-Comm meetings” so glorified in the movie Thirteen Days. "The meetings were repetitive and without direction. Most members of Kennedy's team had no military or diplomatic experience whatsoever. The sessions were a waste of time."
'The Biggest Defeat in Our Nation’s History'—The Cuban Missile Crisis


Amazing what you can put over when you control the media.






Before Kennedy agreed to meet with Khrushchev, at the Vienna summit was a summit meeting held on June 4, 1961, his own advisers had warned him not to do so.....they recognized him as a 'lightweight' as far as foreign policy experience.



"Senior American statesmen like George Kennan advised Kennedy not to rush into a high-level meeting, arguing that Khrushchev had engaged in anti-American propaganda and that the issues at hand could as well be addressed by lower-level diplomats. Kennedy’s own secretary of state, Dean Rusk, had argued much the same in a Foreign Affairs article the previous year..

....Kennedy went ahead, and for two days he was pummeled by the Soviet leader. Despite his eloquence, Kennedy was no match as a sparring partner, and offered only token resistance as Khrushchev lectured him ...

Kennedy’s aides convinced the press at the time that behind closed doors the president was performing well, but American diplomats in attendance, including the ambassador to the Soviet Union, later said they were shocked that Kennedy had taken so much abuse. ... the meeting was “just a disaster.”



Khrushchev’s aide, after the first day, said the American president seemed “very inexperienced, even immature.” Khrushchev agreed, noting that the youthful Kennedy was “too intelligent and too weak.” [Can you say 'Obama'?]




Kennedy’s assessment of his own performance was no less severe. Only a few minutes after parting with Khrushchev, Kennedy, a World War II veteran, told James Reston of The New York Times that the summit meeting had been the “roughest thing in my life.” Kennedy went on:
“He just beat the hell out of me. I’ve got a terrible problem if he thinks I’m inexperienced and have no guts. "Opinion | Kennedy Talked, Khrushchev Triumphed

 

[Blackrook]

No Democratic Party

No Social Security
No Medicare
No Obamacare
No Worker protections

No deficit, no debt.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No Democratic Party

No Social Security
No Medicare
No Obamacare
No Worker protections

No deficit, no debt.

So you were in that medically induced coma during the Obama years?


Have a speedy recovery.

 

[NightFox]

God Bless the Democratic Party and all they do for us!

Let me guess, you graduated at the top of your class from the political re-education camp.

One normally has to visit a Scientologist Convention to witness that degree of brainwashing.

FDR is universally accepted as our greatest modern President. Even among conservative scholars

Ummm...no, he's not.

Of course I wouldn't expect a brainwashed, partisan lemming to know the definition of "universally" , so feel free to carry on with your pom-pom waving partisan sloganeering.

 

[rightwinger]

No Democratic Party

No Social Security
No Medicare
No Obamacare
No Worker protections

No deficit, no debt.

Blame Ronnie