It just means we don't know yet.
So it was a miracle...
"A highly improbable or extraordinary event, development, or accomplishment that brings very welcome consequences."
Oxford Dictionary
...Or are you saying it doesn't meet that definition?
And just because we don't know doesn't make it a miracle.
I do believe it does.
If an ant walks out onto a busy 4 Lane road and makes it across is that a miracle?
What part of the definition I've provided doesn't this example meet?
Let's try it this way. Start from the beginning. You say a God kicked started the universe. OK, that seems like a confident definitive statement as if it's an unequivocal face.
Where did I state that?
So certainly you have at least one bit of evidence this God exists, right?
I observe God and his/her grand works everyday.
You surviving something is no miracle. You're just the smartest animal on this one planet and still very primitive.
Again... What part of the definition I've provided doesn't this example meet?
The question is there a God will never go away but hopefully the lies that he visited will one day fade
What lies would those be?
Before you criticize my beliefs any further perhaps you should read the rest of the thread.
*****CHUCKLE*****
I thought a miracle was a God intervention. My bad.
This, from a Harper's essay, by a physicist.
1. " …according to various calculations, if the values of some of the fundamental parameters of our universe were a little larger or a little smaller, life could not have arisen.
2. For example, if the nuclear force were a few percentage points stronger than it actually is, then all the hydrogen atoms in the infant universe would have fused with other hydrogen atoms to make helium, and there would be no hydrogen left. No hydrogen means no water.
Although we are far from certain about what conditions are necessary for life, most biologists believe that water is necessary.
4. On the other hand, if the nuclear force were substantially weaker than what it actually is, then the complex atoms needed for biology could not hold together.
5. As another example, if the relationship between the strengths of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic force were not close to what it is, then the cosmos would not harbor any stars that explode and spew out life-supporting chemical elements into space or any other stars that form planets. Both kinds of stars are required for the emergence of life.
6. The strengths of the basic forces and certain other fundamental parameters in our universe appear to be “fine-tuned” to allow the existence of life. The recognition of this fine tuning led British physicist Brandon Carter to articulate what he called the anthropic principle, which states that the universe must have the parameters it does because we are here to observe it. Actually, the word anthropic, from the Greek for “man,” is a misnomer: if these fundamental parameters were much different from what they are, it is not only human beings who would not exist. No life of any kind would exist."
The Accidental Universe | Harper's Magazine
Miracle .....or coincidence?
Maybe less miracle and less coincidence but more a kind of very hard fact. If I remember well then all natural constants have to be very very very exact for living structures - in one case it are about 40 digits. So even if the speculation about a Multiversum would be correct: In case we would be able to communicate with other universes then in only less than 1 of 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 cases we would be able to find life within a universe of this multiverse. And we do not know anything about wether life is existing in more than one case in our own universe too.