If Congress can subpoena Clinton over Epstein could they subpoena Trump too in the future?

[Darkwind]

Bill and Hillary Clinton agree to testify in House Epstein investigation

Decision to give testimony comes days before House was expected to vote to hold pair in contempt of Congress

www.theguardian.com

Name a specific reason for them to subpoena him.

Congress cannot just demand we show up as their serfs and ask any old question they want.

There has to be a very specific reason for pulling someone in front of them.

You cannot say, They want to talk to him about his policies.

That is called a witch hunt.

 

[Churchill]

Name a specific reason for them to subpoena him.

Congress cannot just demand we show up as their serfs and ask any old question they want.

There has to be a very specific reason for pulling someone in front of them.

You cannot say, They want to talk to him about his policies.

That is called a witch hunt.

Oh I wouldn't worry about that, they have a pretty long list of things as you (should) already know.

They only need to assert a legitimate legislative purpose, which is a low constitutional bar.

 

[Darkwind]

Oh I wouldn't worry about that, they have a pretty long list of things as you (should) already know.

They only need to assert a legitimate legislative purpose, which is a low constitutional bar.

Name them.

 

[Churchill]

Name them.

Why do you expect me to draft a subpoena? They wanted to subpoena him after the 2020 election but didn't have the votes, so I'm sure they can easily do it once they do have the votes.

Just a matter of time, I'll make sure I stock up on popcorn.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Bill and Hillary Clinton agree to testify in House Epstein investigation

Decision to give testimony comes days before House was expected to vote to hold pair in contempt of Congress

www.theguardian.com

Churchill Since you're new here, please be aware of the rules when starting a new discussion thread.

• Titles and Opening Posts:
  • Titles and opening posts must be free of INFLAMMATORY words, name calling, and "pet names".
  • Content in opening posts must be 2 sentences or more and must contain the opinion of the member starting the thread. "Get a load of this" is not sufficient topical content. Summarize the topic to be discussed and why you think it needs discussion.

Thread 'USMB Rules and Guidelines'

Feb 8, 2013

USMB Site Guidelines and Regulations​

List of Current Active Moderators:
AyeCantSeeYou Dont Taz Me Bro katsteve2012 White 6 OKTexas TemplarKormac

Registration Guidelines:
Individuals are allowed only one (1) account. Anyone found to be in violation risk having all accounts banned.

Site Wide Rules And Guidelines:
The following Rules Apply Everywhere unless otherwise stated on USMB, including Posts, Private Messages, Visitor Messages, and Signatures:

• Please post in English. We...

• cereal_killer
• Replies: 2
• Forum: Announcements and Feedback

• 
• 

 

[marvin martian]

Really? I didn't know trump had appointed any leftists activist judges, man must be a fool, why on earth would he do that!

^^^It's always funny when subjects of the King fail to understand how our democratic government works.

 

[Churchill]

Churchill Since you're new here, please be aware of the rules when starting a new discussion thread.

• Titles and Opening Posts:
  • Titles and opening posts must be free of INFLAMMATORY words, name calling, and "pet names".
  • Content in opening posts must be 2 sentences or more and must contain the opinion of the member starting the thread. "Get a load of this" is not sufficient topical content. Summarize the topic to be discussed and why you think it needs discussion.

My apologies, would you like me add a few sentences to the OP to meet that above rule?

 

[Darkwind]

Why do you expect me to draft a subpoena? They wanted to subpoena him after the 2020 election but didn't have the votes, so I'm sure they can easily do it once they do have the votes.

Just a matter of time, I'll make sure I stock up on popcorn.

I expect you to acknowledge that in order for Congress to subpoena someone, they must have a specific reason. They cannot just call people in front of them to answer any old questions they want to ask.

So, acknowlege that you are just stroking to the idea of Trump being called in front of the teach and giving a beating, or at least have the decency to say what specifically they would legally bring him before them.

You see, the Clintons had specific items they were being called to answer for in front of Congress.

Are you happy they just blew it off? If so, should you give the same consideration to Trump?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

My apologies, would you like me add a few sentences to meet that above rule?

It's not necessary for this one, just for future reference.

 

[Churchill]

I expect you to acknowledge that in order for Congress to subpoena someone, they must have a specific reason. They cannot just call people in front of them to answer any old questions they want to ask.

I never for a moment believed they could subpoena him without some reason, I think my posts make that clear - although I personally can't speculate on a specific reason that doesn't mean others cannot.

So, acknowlege that you are just stroking to the idea of Trump being called in front of the teach and giving a beating, or at least have the decency to say what specifically they would legally bring him before them.

Yes, I do acknowledge that.

You see, the Clintons had specific items they were being called to answer for in front of Congress.

Yes, I know.

Are you happy they just blew it off? If so, should you give the same consideration to Trump?

No, I have no idea of Clinton's involvement with Epstein, although Clinton is not being accused of a crime.

 

[Blaster]

Refusing to answer questions can lead to contempt of congress...

The Clintons should realize this.

 

[Churchill]

The Clintons should realize this.

I'm sure they do, they are both certificated lawyers, had licenses to practice law and so on, unlike the glorified rent collector you are fixated on, he's the one you should be worried about ***** cat.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Oh boy
We gotten now lol

The Crazy Left Wing Retards are trying to pound a square peg into a round hole with their Epstein conspiracy

 

[Lockback]

Tougher? he's never done a physical days work in his life, he has little soft girly hands, cried a river about heel spurs. He's never had to commute in the rain or snow, never had to do physical work, never run, never had a fist fight, never used power tools, never changed a tire, never done most of the things real men do.

The strongest muscle in his body is his ******* jaw!

What kind of pansy are you that a lard ass like that is your hero?

The kind of guy who kicks your ******* pansy asses day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year.

Here's your boss:

He turns your little sister boys into this, wetting their pants all the way:

 

[Churchill]

The kind of guy who kicks your ******* pansy asses day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year.

Here's your boss:

He turns your little sister boys into this, wetting their pants all the way:

Come back when you reach voting age, these juvenile posts of yours are tiresome.

Do your parents know you are posting stuff here?

 

[Lockback]

Come back when you reach voting age, these juvenile posts of yours are tiresome.

Do your parents know you are posting stuff here?

They funny part being that I'm the adult in the room and you're too dumb to know it.

 

[hadit]

I'm sure they do, they are both certificated lawyers, had licenses to practice law and so on, unlike the glorified rent collector you are fixated on, he's the one you should be worried about ***** cat.

You would have thought that Bubba knew lying to judge is a dumb thing to do, but he did it anyway.

 

[Churchill]

You would have thought that Bubba knew lying to judge is a dumb thing to do, but he did it anyway.

He did? I know nothing about that, nor do I care, I have no interest in Clinton or his fate.

 

[Marener]

There is a refusal to answer questions and a truthful answer thar has no information. I was actually questioned about an incident I did not witness. It was unintentionally hilarious.

Mr. Trump, how many times were you a guest on Mr. Epstein’s island?

None

End.

None of the actual real girls there, like Virginia Giuffre, ever put him there. That's why he won't be questioned.

How does that exonerate him?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

How does that exonerate him?

No evidence against him exonerates him.