If a democrat was spouting all of the non sense Trump was, how would the rightwing react?

[Billy000]

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

By the way, the CONTEXT in which is was used wasn't sexual. It means getting your assed whipped in a figurative sense. Leave it up to the party of sexual deviant protectors to make it out as something it isn't.

I agree that's the context he was using, but it doesn't look good when coupled with his other comments about women.

So you couple something unrelated to anything sexual with something you consider sexual and call it a pattern. That's like saying a person wearing plaid one day and stripes the next wears the same thing.

What I'm saying is that the sum of all these comments makes him look like a bonafide sexist. Had he just said the schlong comment, he probably wouldn't receive this severe of a backlash.

 

[Billy000]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

Except, he did not mock a reporters disability.

Of course he did. It's kind of pathetic to say otherwise. Had a democrat done what he did, you people would not shut the **** up about it and you know it.

 

[Conservative65]

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

By the way, the CONTEXT in which is was used wasn't sexual. It means getting your assed whipped in a figurative sense. Leave it up to the party of sexual deviant protectors to make it out as something it isn't.

I agree that's the context he was using, but it doesn't look good when coupled with his other comments about women.

So you couple something unrelated to anything sexual with something you consider sexual and call it a pattern. That's like saying a person wearing plaid one day and stripes the next wears the same thing.

What I'm saying is that the sum of all these comments makes him look like a bonafide sexist. Had he just said the schlong comment, he probably wouldn't receive this severe of a backlash.

If, as you say, the schlong comment wasn't sexual, why do you count it as an example?

 

[Billy000]

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

By the way, the CONTEXT in which is was used wasn't sexual. It means getting your assed whipped in a figurative sense. Leave it up to the party of sexual deviant protectors to make it out as something it isn't.

I agree that's the context he was using, but it doesn't look good when coupled with his other comments about women.

So you couple something unrelated to anything sexual with something you consider sexual and call it a pattern. That's like saying a person wearing plaid one day and stripes the next wears the same thing.

What I'm saying is that the sum of all these comments makes him look like a bonafide sexist. Had he just said the schlong comment, he probably wouldn't receive this severe of a backlash.

If, as you say, the schlong comment wasn't sexual, why do you count it as an example?

I don't, but it doesn't surprise me if many others do given Trump's reputation.

 

[Redfish]

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

They ignore that an NPR commentator said it. When you chastise someone you oppose for saying it while refusing to acknowledge one of your own did it toward one of your own, that's all the proof one needs.

An NPR commentator made the statement about Mondale/Ferraro sometime in 2010 as part of a story related to Ferraro's death.

There is no separation of the two. Both used the same word. Difference is one was a Liberal and one wasn't. Guess who gets chastised for doing the SAME thing? When the side that does the chastising constantly applies a different standard when one of their own does it and the opposition does it, after a while the reputation of being hypocrites sticks.

Of course there is a separation of the two. Had Trump just said this schlong comment and had not made those other female bodily comments, you would have a point. His schlong comment is part of a pattern of rhetoric. Plus, it's not like this NPR guy is running for public office.

His schlong comment was something the PC crowd doesn't like unless they say it.

It's irrelevant the position of the one that says it. Position doesn't effect whether or not a TERM is vulgar. The term does moron.

Lol we already know Trump is vulgar based on many other comments. This one just adds to it. His intended context may have not been vulgar, but it only looks bad when considering everything else he has been saying.

yeah, right. vote for the ***** who told her secret service protection to "**** off". classless *****.

 

[Conservative65]

By the way, the CONTEXT in which is was used wasn't sexual. It means getting your assed whipped in a figurative sense. Leave it up to the party of sexual deviant protectors to make it out as something it isn't.

I agree that's the context he was using, but it doesn't look good when coupled with his other comments about women.

So you couple something unrelated to anything sexual with something you consider sexual and call it a pattern. That's like saying a person wearing plaid one day and stripes the next wears the same thing.

What I'm saying is that the sum of all these comments makes him look like a bonafide sexist. Had he just said the schlong comment, he probably wouldn't receive this severe of a backlash.

If, as you say, the schlong comment wasn't sexual, why do you count it as an example?

I don't, but it doesn't surprise me if many others do given Trump's reputation.

You did many times. You keep bringing it up when referring to Trump being sexist. You mentioned it each time. If it doesn't count to you, why mention it.

It doesn't surprise me about all of you.