ICE Agents Can Now Be Arrested in Chicago

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
82,017
Reaction score
45,696
Points
2,605
Location
In a Republic, actually
"A FEDERAL JUDGE IN CHICAGO RULED last Wednesday that starting this week ICE agents can now face arrest and contempt proceedings if they conduct unlawful, warrantless arrests, marking a dramatic shift in immigration enforcement oversight in the city.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings found that ICE agents violated the terms of a consent decree by detaining people without proper warrants, following a surge in such arrests amid increased enforcement activity. According to the judge’s order, ICE agents must now wear body cameras and have them turned on. They also cannot arrest anyone complying with their appointment dates at immigration courthouses.

The latest order expands protections for immigrants, mandating rigorous reporting and retraining requirements for agents and creating court-backed avenues for legal consequences—including possible arrest—for those found violating the judge’s directive."


Very good.

There is no legitimate reason to object to these protections for immigrants.

ICE agents are subject to the rule of law.
 
So what that lunatic non judge apparently just said was that local police on the spot and in the moment can hold a make pretend trial and if they consider ICE out of line then they can arrest ICE
Of course this will instigate a response from ICE which the loons will blame on ICE and shrug off their own responsibility
 
"A FEDERAL JUDGE IN CHICAGO RULED last Wednesday that starting this week ICE agents can now face arrest and contempt proceedings if they conduct unlawful, warrantless arrests, marking a dramatic shift in immigration enforcement oversight in the city.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings found that ICE agents violated the terms of a consent decree by detaining people without proper warrants, following a surge in such arrests amid increased enforcement activity. According to the judge’s order, ICE agents must now wear body cameras and have them turned on. They also cannot arrest anyone complying with their appointment dates at immigration courthouses.

The latest order expands protections for immigrants, mandating rigorous reporting and retraining requirements for agents and creating court-backed avenues for legal consequences—including possible arrest—for those found violating the judge’s directive."


Very good.

There is no legitimate reason to object to these protections for immigrants.

ICE agents are subject to the rule of law.
They are not immigrants
 
Sounds like a Constitutional Crisis. Thanks for that, judge!
 
Supremacy Clause says this activist judge is full of shit.


Anybody else as shocked as I am?

1760983256878.webp
 
"A FEDERAL JUDGE IN CHICAGO RULED last Wednesday that starting this week ICE agents can now face arrest and contempt proceedings if they conduct unlawful, warrantless arrests, marking a dramatic shift in immigration enforcement oversight in the city.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings found that ICE agents violated the terms of a consent decree by detaining people without proper warrants, following a surge in such arrests amid increased enforcement activity. According to the judge’s order, ICE agents must now wear body cameras and have them turned on. They also cannot arrest anyone complying with their appointment dates at immigration courthouses.

The latest order expands protections for immigrants, mandating rigorous reporting and retraining requirements for agents and creating court-backed avenues for legal consequences—including possible arrest—for those found violating the judge’s directive."


Very good.

There is no legitimate reason to object to these protections for immigrants.

ICE agents are subject to the rule of law.

I agree, stop arresting them. Double-tap them in the chest then put the third round between their eyes.
 
"A FEDERAL JUDGE IN CHICAGO RULED last Wednesday that starting this week ICE agents can now face arrest and contempt proceedings if they conduct unlawful, warrantless arrests, marking a dramatic shift in immigration enforcement oversight in the city.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings found that ICE agents violated the terms of a consent decree by detaining people without proper warrants, following a surge in such arrests amid increased enforcement activity. According to the judge’s order, ICE agents must now wear body cameras and have them turned on. They also cannot arrest anyone complying with their appointment dates at immigration courthouses.

The latest order expands protections for immigrants, mandating rigorous reporting and retraining requirements for agents and creating court-backed avenues for legal consequences—including possible arrest—for those found violating the judge’s directive."


Very good.

There is no legitimate reason to object to these protections for immigrants.

ICE agents are subject to the rule of law.
Sure sounds like someone needs to be arrested for aiding and abetting.
 
"A FEDERAL JUDGE IN CHICAGO RULED last Wednesday that starting this week ICE agents can now face arrest and contempt proceedings if they conduct unlawful, warrantless arrests, marking a dramatic shift in immigration enforcement oversight in the city.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings found that ICE agents violated the terms of a consent decree by detaining people without proper warrants, following a surge in such arrests amid increased enforcement activity. According to the judge’s order, ICE agents must now wear body cameras and have them turned on. They also cannot arrest anyone complying with their appointment dates at immigration courthouses.

The latest order expands protections for immigrants, mandating rigorous reporting and retraining requirements for agents and creating court-backed avenues for legal consequences—including possible arrest—for those found violating the judge’s directive."


Very good.

There is no legitimate reason to object to these protections for immigrants.

ICE agents are subject to the rule of law.
There is no legitimate reason to object to these protections for immigrants
for immigrants, no.

Illegal aliens should not have those protections, because by definition, they are criminals.
 
"A FEDERAL JUDGE IN CHICAGO RULED last Wednesday that starting this week ICE agents can now face arrest and contempt proceedings if they conduct unlawful, warrantless arrests, marking a dramatic shift in immigration enforcement oversight in the city.
What the issue. I would hope law enforcement at both the Federal and State level conduct only lawful arrests.

This article is a little less hyperventilating.
CHICAGO (WLS) -- A U.S. District Judge has ruled Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents violated a previously agreed-upon consent decree over warrantless arrests in the Chicago area and unlawfully detained more than two dozen people in the first months of President Donald Trump's second administration.

"Collateral arrests" or people arrested while ICE agents are patrolling the street, often without a previously signed warrant, have been a major tactic deployed during the local immigration enforcement crackdown branded "Operation Midway Blitz."
 
for immigrants, no.

Illegal aliens should not have those protections, because by definition, they are criminals.
The lack a number of benefits and protections that citizens do
Remember, even as full citizens we lose many of our rights and benefits when charged and then convicted of criminal acts
They are criminals as their very first act on American soil
 
What the issue. I would hope law enforcement at both the Federal and State level conduct only lawful arrests.

This article is a little less hyperventilating.
CHICAGO (WLS) -- A U.S. District Judge has ruled Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents violated a previously agreed-upon consent decree over warrantless arrests in the Chicago area and unlawfully detained more than two dozen people in the first months of President Donald Trump's second administration.

"Collateral arrests" or people arrested while ICE agents are patrolling the street, often without a previously signed warrant, have been a major tactic deployed during the local immigration enforcement crackdown branded "Operation Midway Blitz."
Shilling for the bad guys over the 0.5%!that get wrongfully caught up mostly because they are hanging around the criminal invaders.
Massive Pearl Clutching
 
15th post
"A FEDERAL JUDGE IN CHICAGO RULED last Wednesday that starting this week ICE agents can now face arrest and contempt proceedings if they conduct unlawful, warrantless arrests, marking a dramatic shift in immigration enforcement oversight in the city.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings found that ICE agents violated the terms of a consent decree by detaining people without proper warrants, following a surge in such arrests amid increased enforcement activity. According to the judge’s order, ICE agents must now wear body cameras and have them turned on. They also cannot arrest anyone complying with their appointment dates at immigration courthouses.

The latest order expands protections for immigrants, mandating rigorous reporting and retraining requirements for agents and creating court-backed avenues for legal consequences—including possible arrest—for those found violating the judge’s directive."


Very good.

There is no legitimate reason to object to these protections for immigrants.

ICE agents are subject to the rule of law.
Joe Biden
[th]
Appointed by​
[/th]​
Dumb Democrat house Negro gonna get ***** slapped by the supreme court
 
The lack a number of benefits and protections that citizens do
Remember, even as full citizens we lose many of our rights and benefits when charged and then convicted of criminal acts
They are criminals as their very first act on American soil

Well there are standards for Constitutional detainment or Arrest. I believe that is what the judge is saying, especially related to ancillary arrests without warrant. Those standards are not particularly high though.
 
Well there are standards for Constitutional detainment or Arrest. I believe that is what the judge is saying, especially related to ancillary arrests without warrant. Those standards are not particularly high though.
Don't need a warrant if they are illegally in the country and detained screw this over reaching judge
 
Back
Top Bottom