I wouldn't vote to convict the cop who shot Rayshard Brooks of murder

[AzogtheDefiler]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

 

[Blues Man]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He dropped the taser and ran.

Besides that a taser can only be discharged once and before it can be fired again a new cartridge must be installed. The thing was useless after he fired it and since he dropped itr before he ran there was no way he could have used it on anyone else

He fired it? Did it not go off?

And he missed by a mile.

After that the taser was useless and could not be used until a fresh cartridge was installed.

And once again he dropped the taser BEFORE HE RAN. He was no longer on possession of it when he was shot so who could he have used it on?

 

[Blues Man]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

Autopsy report: Rayshard Brooks was shot twice in the back, manner of death ruled a homicide - Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News

(CNN) — Rayshard Brooks was shot twice in the back, according to a release by the Fulton County, Georgia, Medical Examiner’s Office.Brooks died from organ<a class="excerpt-read-more"...

whdh.com

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Non working. He snatched a taser not refill cartridges. After it was fired it was useless. No if, ands, or buts about it.

It was bang bang. Did you watch the video? Do you think it was racism that caused that or a panicked cop chasing someone who just assaulted him?

 

[Asclepias]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

Nope. Youre wrong again. Both shots hit him in the back the other shot almost killed someone in a car.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

Autopsy report: Rayshard Brooks was shot twice in the back, manner of death ruled a homicide - Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News

(CNN) — Rayshard Brooks was shot twice in the back, according to a release by the Fulton County, Georgia, Medical Examiner’s Office.Brooks died from organ<a class="excerpt-read-more"...

whdh.com

There were three shots fired. First one hit the side. I watched it. Maybe my eyes deceive me.

 

[Blues Man]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Non working. He snatched a taser not refill cartridges. After it was fired it was useless. No if, ands, or buts about it.

It was bang bang. Did you watch the video? Do you think it was racism that caused that or a panicked cop chasing someone who just assaulted him?

no it wasn't.

The cop stopped dropped the taser he was holding and fired AFTER Brooks dropped the taser he had and ran

The cop shot an unarmed man in the back

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

Nope. Youre wrong again. Both shots hit him in the back the other shot almost killed someone in a car.

There were three shots. Not two. I watched it and it looked like the shots rang as he was firing his tazer.

 

[Asclepias]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Non working. He snatched a taser not refill cartridges. After it was fired it was useless. No if, ands, or buts about it.

It was bang bang. Did you watch the video? Do you think it was racism that caused that or a panicked cop chasing someone who just assaulted him?

Yes I watched the video. He wasnt panicked he was angry. Thats why he probably sealed his fate by saying "gottem" for the world to hear.

 

[Asclepias]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

Nope. Youre wrong again. Both shots hit him in the back the other shot almost killed someone in a car.

There were three shots. Not two. I watched it and it looked like the shots rang as he was firing his tazer.

Read my comment again.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Non working. He snatched a taser not refill cartridges. After it was fired it was useless. No if, ands, or buts about it.

It was bang bang. Did you watch the video? Do you think it was racism that caused that or a panicked cop chasing someone who just assaulted him?

no it wasn't.

The cop stopped dropped the taser he was holding and fired AFTER Brooks dropped the taser he had and ran

The cop shot an unarmed man in the back

Not what I saw and it wasn’t racial why did you add the “black” in there. It’s on video and not as cut and dry as the Floyd murder. So let’s see what happens. This is at worst bad police judgment. It is not due to race.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

Nope. Youre wrong again. Both shots hit him in the back the other shot almost killed someone in a car.

There were three shots. Not two. I watched it and it looked like the shots rang as he was firing his tazer.

Read my comment again.

How could you tell the video is flawed at best. To me it looked like it was bang bang. If he cooperated and didn’t resist arrest then he would still be alive.

 

[Asclepias]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

Nope. Youre wrong again. Both shots hit him in the back the other shot almost killed someone in a car.

There were three shots. Not two. I watched it and it looked like the shots rang as he was firing his tazer.

Read my comment again.

How could you tell the video is flawed at best. To me it looked like it was bang bang. If he cooperated and didn’t resist arrest then he would still be alive.

I could tell because I can see and I can read. Two shots to his back and the other almost killed someone in a car.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

Nope. Youre wrong again. Both shots hit him in the back the other shot almost killed someone in a car.

There were three shots. Not two. I watched it and it looked like the shots rang as he was firing his tazer.

Read my comment again.

How could you tell the video is flawed at best. To me it looked like it was bang bang. If he cooperated and didn’t resist arrest then he would still be alive.

I could tell because I can see and I can read. Two shots to his back and the other almost killed someone in a car.

Where in the back? I bet they are closer to the side. Again if he doesn’t resist none of this happens.

 

[easyt65]

And could have, would have, might have scenarios are irrelevant.

That Taser had one shot. The shot missed by a mile then he dropped it. There was no way he could have incapacitated the cop with the taser after he dropped it.

As a civilian if I shot an unarmed man in the back as he was running away from me there is no way in hell any court would accept a self defense plea. Why should a trained police officer be held to a lower standard than a civilian?

As I stated multiple times, any individual who would choose to assault an officer, steal his weapon, and attempt to shoot a policeman - knowing the police already have his name and info - has proven he is a danger to the police and the community.

People can keep skipping right over all the criminal acts Brooks committed - resisting arrest, assault, attempted to shoot / stun the policeman - and just focus on the action taken by the policeman if they want but that is refusing to hold Brooks accountable for his own mistakes / crimes in this.

The biggest lesson here is not how the cops are monsters and love to kill blacks, both a lie.
The lesson here are:
1. RESPECT the Cops
2. Comply with what they ask you to do.
3. Do NOT resist the police.
4. Do NOT attack / assault the police.
5. Don't take a policeman's weapon
6. Don't try to shoot / stun a cop

BEFORE Brooks was shot, had he followed any of these things he would be alive today. Period. Dot.


.

 

[Blues Man]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Non working. He snatched a taser not refill cartridges. After it was fired it was useless. No if, ands, or buts about it.

It was bang bang. Did you watch the video? Do you think it was racism that caused that or a panicked cop chasing someone who just assaulted him?

no it wasn't.

The cop stopped dropped the taser he was holding and fired AFTER Brooks dropped the taser he had and ran

The cop shot an unarmed man in the back

Not what I saw and it wasn’t racial why did you add the “black” in there. It’s on video and not as cut and dry as the Floyd murder. So let’s see what happens. This is at worst bad police judgment. It is not due to race.

Where did I add "Black" in there?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Non working. He snatched a taser not refill cartridges. After it was fired it was useless. No if, ands, or buts about it.

It was bang bang. Did you watch the video? Do you think it was racism that caused that or a panicked cop chasing someone who just assaulted him?

no it wasn't.

The cop stopped dropped the taser he was holding and fired AFTER Brooks dropped the taser he had and ran

The cop shot an unarmed man in the back

Not what I saw and it wasn’t racial why did you add the “black” in there. It’s on video and not as cut and dry as the Floyd murder. So let’s see what happens. This is at worst bad police judgment. It is not due to race.

Where did I add "Black" in there?

You didn’t. I must be seeing things. Jeezus. My bad.

 

[Blues Man]

And could have, would have, might have scenarios are irrelevant.

That Taser had one shot. The shot missed by a mile then he dropped it. There was no way he could have incapacitated the cop with the taser after he dropped it.

As a civilian if I shot an unarmed man in the back as he was running away from me there is no way in hell any court would accept a self defense plea. Why should a trained police officer be held to a lower standard than a civilian?

As I stated multiple times, any individual who would choose to assault an officer, steal his weapon, and attempt to shoot a policeman - knowing the police already have his name and info - has proven he is a danger to the police and the community.

People can keep skipping right over all the criminal acts Brooks committed - resisting arrest, assault, attempted to shoot / stun the policeman - and just focus on the action taken by the policeman if they want but that is refusing to hold Brooks accountable for his own mistakes / crimes in this.

The biggest lesson here is not how the cops are monsters and love to kill blacks, both a lie.
The lesson here are:
1. RESPECT the Cops
2. Comply with what they ask you to do.
3. Do NOT resist the police.
4. Do NOT attack / assault the police.
5. Don't take a policeman's weapon
6. Don't try to shoot / stun a cop

BEFORE Brooks was shot, had he followed any of these things he would be alive today. Period. Dot.


.

I disagree.

He was no danger to anyone as he was unarmed and running away.

I as a civilian could not claim defense of myself or others if I shot an unarmed man in the back as he was running away from me.

Why should a cop be held to a lesser standard than a civilian?

 

[Asclepias]

He was not shot in the back

Yes he was stupid.

" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "

Eh? He was drunk?

Now youre 0-465

He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.

He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.

My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.

He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.

What I wanted to post.

Of course it was.

When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.

And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?

He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?

Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...

Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.

But he didn't.

And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?

Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?

Nope. Youre wrong again. Both shots hit him in the back the other shot almost killed someone in a car.

There were three shots. Not two. I watched it and it looked like the shots rang as he was firing his tazer.

Read my comment again.

How could you tell the video is flawed at best. To me it looked like it was bang bang. If he cooperated and didn’t resist arrest then he would still be alive.

I could tell because I can see and I can read. Two shots to his back and the other almost killed someone in a car.

Where in the back? I bet they are closer to the side. Again if he doesn’t resist none of this happens.

I didnt do the autopsy and really it doesnt matter. The back is the back. People resist all the time. It shouldnt end up with him getting shot in the back.

 

[Asclepias]

And could have, would have, might have scenarios are irrelevant.

That Taser had one shot. The shot missed by a mile then he dropped it. There was no way he could have incapacitated the cop with the taser after he dropped it.

As a civilian if I shot an unarmed man in the back as he was running away from me there is no way in hell any court would accept a self defense plea. Why should a trained police officer be held to a lower standard than a civilian?

As I stated multiple times, any individual who would choose to assault an officer, steal his weapon, and attempt to shoot a policeman - knowing the police already have his name and info - has proven he is a danger to the police and the community.

People can keep skipping right over all the criminal acts Brooks committed - resisting arrest, assault, attempted to shoot / stun the policeman - and just focus on the action taken by the policeman if they want but that is refusing to hold Brooks accountable for his own mistakes / crimes in this.

The biggest lesson here is not how the cops are monsters and love to kill blacks, both a lie.
The lesson here are:
1. RESPECT the Cops
2. Comply with what they ask you to do.
3. Do NOT resist the police.
4. Do NOT attack / assault the police.
5. Don't take a policeman's weapon
6. Don't try to shoot / stun a cop

BEFORE Brooks was shot, had he followed any of these things he would be alive today. Period. Dot.


.

No one cares what you stated. That is evidenced by the fact that the POS is now an ex-cop and soon to be facing charges.