I will not Bow!

[pbel]

The report was written by a palestinian reporter who is very biased. it was only syndicated by AP to Yahoo and others. So this stands as an example of you not looking at the source of your links to see what their ulterior motive is.
How many times do we see the words " from a Palestinian source" when anti Israeli links are posted. This discredits the source straight away after the pallywood exposes in recent years.

Man, you are one sick dummy...The AP is known world wide for its integrity, your bias and hate is disgusting in accusing any reporter as being biased because he has an Muslim sounding name...Your hate is all consuming and it will destroy you and Israel.

I did the research on your first link to this thread and find that it came to Yahoo via AP who got it from a pro Palestinian Journo. Can you deny this is the case. By the way he is a she and you would know that if you followed the links I provided, but you prefer to just jump in with both feet.

It seems that you don't like to be proven wrong on your sources of information, or when you are actually LYING about the situation in the M.E.

Well prove me wrong. Show some evidence that the AP is biased in general and in favor of the Palestinians...Its pretty clear that calling Yahoo a hate site is making your accusations foolish.

 

[aris2chat]

Man, you are one sick dummy...The AP is known world wide for its integrity, your bias and hate is disgusting in accusing any reporter as being biased because he has an Muslim sounding name...Your hate is all consuming and it will destroy you and Israel.

I did the research on your first link to this thread and find that it came to Yahoo via AP who got it from a pro Palestinian Journo. Can you deny this is the case. By the way he is a she and you would know that if you followed the links I provided, but you prefer to just jump in with both feet.

It seems that you don't like to be proven wrong on your sources of information, or when you are actually LYING about the situation in the M.E.

Well prove me wrong. Show some evidence that the AP is biased in general and in favor of the Palestinians...Its pretty clear that calling Yahoo a hate site is making your accusations foolish.

AP is not a media service, it is freelance authors using a common wire service to disseminate their stories. New services choose to pick up particular stories and publish them.

AP is not bias, but writers that use the AP can be very bias. They want their story to sell and if they can make it the most sensational or have the most "blood", it will be picked up by more news services.

 

[pbel]

I did the research on your first link to this thread and find that it came to Yahoo via AP who got it from a pro Palestinian Journo. Can you deny this is the case. By the way he is a she and you would know that if you followed the links I provided, but you prefer to just jump in with both feet.

It seems that you don't like to be proven wrong on your sources of information, or when you are actually LYING about the situation in the M.E.

Well prove me wrong. Show some evidence that the AP is biased in general and in favor of the Palestinians...Its pretty clear that calling Yahoo a hate site is making your accusations foolish.

AP is not a media service, it is freelance authors using a common wire service to disseminate their stories. New services choose to pick up particular stories and publish them.

AP is not bias, but writers that use the AP can be very bias. They want their story to sell and if they can make it the most sensational or have the most "blood", it will be picked up by more news services.

Why throw out foolish possibilities...I'm sure that AP has Editors to push for publishing the Truth...The Foolish Pro-Zionuts use Anti-Semitism ad nauseam when they can not win an argument on its merits, like a trump card and its disgusting....

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

Some AP controversies here 2006 Lebanon War photographs controversies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

Some AP controversies here 2006 Lebanon War photographs controversies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And also here
The PJ Tatler » Associated Press releases staged fauxtographs from Lebanon

And more than likely more on the internet but I don't have the time to post them here.

So anyone who thinks AP is squeaky-clean is mistaken.

 

[Phoenall]

Man, you are one sick dummy...The AP is known world wide for its integrity, your bias and hate is disgusting in accusing any reporter as being biased because he has an Muslim sounding name...Your hate is all consuming and it will destroy you and Israel.

I did the research on your first link to this thread and find that it came to Yahoo via AP who got it from a pro Palestinian Journo. Can you deny this is the case. By the way he is a she and you would know that if you followed the links I provided, but you prefer to just jump in with both feet.

It seems that you don't like to be proven wrong on your sources of information, or when you are actually LYING about the situation in the M.E.

Well prove me wrong. Show some evidence that the AP is biased in general and in favor of the Palestinians...Its pretty clear that calling Yahoo a hate site is making your accusations foolish.

I am not saying that Yahoo is a hate site, I am saying the source for their material comes from a hateful Palestinian journalist.

The evidence has been produced when it blindly took the word of a "Palestinian source" that the picture was that of an Israeli policeman in the act of battering an already bloodied Palestinian. When a little bit of research would have shown that the picture was actually an American tourist that had been beaten by a GANG of Palestinians and the officer was chasing them away.

It shows an unhealthy bias against Israel and the Jews and cost AP quiet a lot of money

 

[Phoenall]

Well prove me wrong. Show some evidence that the AP is biased in general and in favor of the Palestinians...Its pretty clear that calling Yahoo a hate site is making your accusations foolish.

AP is not a media service, it is freelance authors using a common wire service to disseminate their stories. New services choose to pick up particular stories and publish them.

AP is not bias, but writers that use the AP can be very bias. They want their story to sell and if they can make it the most sensational or have the most "blood", it will be picked up by more news services.

Why throw out foolish possibilities...I'm sure that AP has Editors to push for publishing the Truth...The Foolish Pro-Zionuts use Anti-Semitism ad nauseam when they can not win an argument on its merits, like a trump card and its disgusting....

You can tell when one of the pro Palestinians is losing the argument they resort to immature name calling and fabrications. AP relies on their sources doing their own editing, just as haaretz does for its online section. They are not media presenters, just sources of news. So if a pro Palestinian source submits an editorial they will pass out to the media the editorial and charge a fee per copy based on circulation figures.

It is disgusting how even when shown that their source for news about Israel is proven to be from a biased source the pro Palestinians still attack the Jews out of pure NAZI HATE.

 

[pbel]

AP is not a media service, it is freelance authors using a common wire service to disseminate their stories. New services choose to pick up particular stories and publish them.

AP is not bias, but writers that use the AP can be very bias. They want their story to sell and if they can make it the most sensational or have the most "blood", it will be picked up by more news services.

Why throw out foolish possibilities...I'm sure that AP has Editors to push for publishing the Truth...The Foolish Pro-Zionuts use Anti-Semitism ad nauseam when they can not win an argument on its merits, like a trump card and its disgusting....

You can tell when one of the pro Palestinians is losing the argument they resort to immature name calling and fabrications. AP relies on their sources doing their own editing, just as haaretz does for its online section. They are not media presenters, just sources of news. So if a pro Palestinian source submits an editorial they will pass out to the media the editorial and charge a fee per copy based on circulation figures.

It is disgusting how even when shown that their source for news about Israel is proven to be from a biased source the pro Palestinians still attack the Jews out of pure NAZI HATE.

The only name calling Nazi is you and your ilk, who whine Nazi Hate like Chicken Little.

The AP "As part of their cooperative agreement with The Associated Press, most member news organizations grant automatic permission for the AP to distribute their local news reports. For example, on page two of every edition of The Washington Post, the newspaper's masthead includes the statement, "The Associated Press is entitled exclusively to use for re-publication of all news dispatches credited to it or not otherwise credited in this paper and all local news of spontaneous origin published herein."

Associated Press - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The AP employs the "inverted pyramid formula" for writing that enables the news outlets to edit a story to fit its available publication area without losing the story's essential meaning and news information.

Stop your sick lying.

 

[toastman]

AP is not a media service, it is freelance authors using a common wire service to disseminate their stories. New services choose to pick up particular stories and publish them.

AP is not bias, but writers that use the AP can be very bias. They want their story to sell and if they can make it the most sensational or have the most "blood", it will be picked up by more news services.

Why throw out foolish possibilities...I'm sure that AP has Editors to push for publishing the Truth...The Foolish Pro-Zionuts use Anti-Semitism ad nauseam when they can not win an argument on its merits, like a trump card and its disgusting....

You can tell when one of the pro Palestinians is losing the argument they resort to immature name calling and fabrications. AP relies on their sources doing their own editing, just as haaretz does for its online section. They are not media presenters, just sources of news. So if a pro Palestinian source submits an editorial they will pass out to the media the editorial and charge a fee per copy based on circulation figures.

It is disgusting how even when shown that their source for news about Israel is proven to be from a biased source the pro Palestinians still attack the Jews out of pure NAZI HATE.

Stupid Nazis like him will always be stupid Nazis

 

[pbel]

Why throw out foolish possibilities...I'm sure that AP has Editors to push for publishing the Truth...The Foolish Pro-Zionuts use Anti-Semitism ad nauseam when they can not win an argument on its merits, like a trump card and its disgusting....

You can tell when one of the pro Palestinians is losing the argument they resort to immature name calling and fabrications. AP relies on their sources doing their own editing, just as haaretz does for its online section. They are not media presenters, just sources of news. So if a pro Palestinian source submits an editorial they will pass out to the media the editorial and charge a fee per copy based on circulation figures.

It is disgusting how even when shown that their source for news about Israel is proven to be from a biased source the pro Palestinians still attack the Jews out of pure NAZI HATE.

Stupid Nazis like him will always be stupid Nazis

Da little weiner chimes in with is intellectualism of "tupid Nazis dey evwy where...Where's Tattle Teller!

 

[Billo_Really]

Try again the remit was 'let me know when Israelis are gassing Palestinians to death' and you posted a video as your example of Israelis gassing people to death. It was an attempt at pretending that the Israelis were gassing people to death that failed when you were pulled up short on it.

That's what you're trying to spin it into.

I posted a video of some IDF prick shooting tear gas at an innocent civilian.

By the way there was no indication in the video that the IDF were even involved, take another look and give me the time at the bottom were we see the IDF firing the tear gas ?

That's not the only video out there.

They have priors!

 

[aris2chat]

Take any news story with a dash of skepticism and a lot of information. I get news from more than 300 sources during the day and I have to find a logical balance between stories. I often have eye witnesses via twitter giving me play by plays of what is happening. I weight what I receive with my own knowledge of the situation and of the people involved.
Obviously not every story will be accurate, news off the wire is in flux, just like it is on twitter.
I would never rely on only one new station or paper. I want to hear every point of view, and make my own mind up.

 

[pbel]

Take any news story with a dash of skepticism and a lot of information. I get news from more than 300 sources during the day and I have to find a logical balance between stories. I often have eye witnesses via twitter giving me play by plays of what is happening. I weight what I receive with my own knowledge of the situation and of the people involved.
Obviously not every story will be accurate, news off the wire is in flux, just like it is on twitter.
I would never rely on only one new station or paper. I want to hear every point of view, and make my own mind up.

We are talking about this story not journalism 101..Do you believe this story is biased and Jew Hate like Phoenall originally accused?

 

[aris2chat]

Take any news story with a dash of skepticism and a lot of information. I get news from more than 300 sources during the day and I have to find a logical balance between stories. I often have eye witnesses via twitter giving me play by plays of what is happening. I weight what I receive with my own knowledge of the situation and of the people involved.
Obviously not every story will be accurate, news off the wire is in flux, just like it is on twitter.
I would never rely on only one new station or paper. I want to hear every point of view, and make my own mind up.

We are talking about this story not journalism 101..Do you believe this story is biased and Jew Hate like Phoenall originally accused?

It is has a perspective that is more favorable to the "suffering" palestinians, because that story will sell better. If the palestinians are portrayed as the victim, Israel must then be cast as the antagonist or black hat.

 

[pbel]

Take any news story with a dash of skepticism and a lot of information. I get news from more than 300 sources during the day and I have to find a logical balance between stories. I often have eye witnesses via twitter giving me play by plays of what is happening. I weight what I receive with my own knowledge of the situation and of the people involved.
Obviously not every story will be accurate, news off the wire is in flux, just like it is on twitter.
I would never rely on only one new station or paper. I want to hear every point of view, and make my own mind up.

We are talking about this story not journalism 101..Do you believe this story is biased and Jew Hate like Phoenall originally accused?

It is has a perspective that is more favorable to the "suffering" palestinians, because that story will sell better. If the palestinians are portrayed as the victim, Israel must then be cast as the antagonist or black hat.

Be more specific, what part of that story implies that? You really sound like an apologist when you make general impressions.

 

[Sally]

We are talking about this story not journalism 101..Do you believe this story is biased and Jew Hate like Phoenall originally accused?

It is has a perspective that is more favorable to the "suffering" palestinians, because that story will sell better. If the palestinians are portrayed as the victim, Israel must then be cast as the antagonist or black hat.

Be more specific, what part of that story implies that? You really sound like an apologist when you make general impressions.

I think Raymond Ibrahim, a Christian with Egyptian roots, sums up the media pretty nicely.

Why the Media Doesn't Cover Jihadist Attacks on Middle East Christians :: Middle East Forum

 

[toastman]

It is has a perspective that is more favorable to the "suffering" palestinians, because that story will sell better. If the palestinians are portrayed as the victim, Israel must then be cast as the antagonist or black hat.

Be more specific, what part of that story implies that? You really sound like an apologist when you make general impressions.

I think Raymond Ibrahim, a Christian with Egyptian roots, sums up the media pretty nicely.

Why the Media Doesn't Cover Jihadist Attacks on Middle East Christians :: Middle East Forum

Great read Sally. Thanks for posting.

 

[pbel]

It is has a perspective that is more favorable to the "suffering" palestinians, because that story will sell better. If the palestinians are portrayed as the victim, Israel must then be cast as the antagonist or black hat.

Be more specific, what part of that story implies that? You really sound like an apologist when you make general impressions.

I think Raymond Ibrahim, a Christian with Egyptian roots, sums up the media pretty nicely.

Why the Media Doesn't Cover Jihadist Attacks on Middle East Christians :: Middle East Forum

As usual, off on a tangent...Stick to the AP story.

 

[Sally]

Be more specific, what part of that story implies that? You really sound like an apologist when you make general impressions.

I think Raymond Ibrahim, a Christian with Egyptian roots, sums up the media pretty nicely.

Why the Media Doesn't Cover Jihadist Attacks on Middle East Christians :: Middle East Forum

As usual, off on a tangent...Stick to the AP story.

Do you really believe everything that comes from the AP. You must be very naive. However, I do believe than when you find an AP story that is negative towarfd Israel, you lap it up and believe every word.

 

[aris2chat]

We are talking about this story not journalism 101..Do you believe this story is biased and Jew Hate like Phoenall originally accused?

It is has a perspective that is more favorable to the "suffering" palestinians, because that story will sell better. If the palestinians are portrayed as the victim, Israel must then be cast as the antagonist or black hat.

Be more specific, what part of that story implies that? You really sound like an apologist when you make general impressions.

I dealt with the Palestinians narrative for too long. I wouldn't sell it or use it in my work on their behalf. Eventually I could work for them or with them because of the lies.
I've seen and heard the Daily star and BBC perspective vs. the WSJ, the Post or the Sun. From arabic radio to voice of american. From China to West Africa. Everyone has their own agenda. I like to read them all.