I was wrong.

I am reasonable. His behavior wasn't justifying before the election. Courts have found him guilty of a wide range of unethical behaviors. That all goes away now because of an election. Nobody should be above the law.
Why ain't he in jail?
 
The Clinton Foundation was audited by multiple external auditing firms. No unethical or illegal activities were found.
And you ignore the first half of the question, nice try.
 
The regulatory part of the definition is a gray area with Trump as he does want to deregulate more than a stereotypical fascist. There is much more the the definition of fascist that you are completely ignoring
Your only source is a disgruntled employee. Listen to Ben’s podcast post election so Nov 6. He actually discusses this point. The real fascist is you and you don’t even see it
 
Hi coalition is full of ass kissers who either sucked up to him or who could bring him votes and influence to win the election.
Nope. They are full of those who didn’t like the direction the country was going in. Since you want to keep insulting me I ll do the the same with you, Herr Slade. His win has clearly broken you. Calling Ben and me Fascists is a joke. You’re a joke.
 
Correct, you wouldn't vote for him, and if he instututed the same trolling, dishonest, bully tacts that he currently operates under you'd be screaming fascism. You've got a huge blind spot because he is on your "team"

You didn’t read what I wrote. Try again, Herr Slade.
 
Keep reading... Not every point needs to hit for something to still apply. The vast majority of fascist traits hit the bullseye.
Not every point just those that feed into your narrative. Another poor debate tactic by Herr Slade.

Herr Slade: Your dog is vicious

Me: He is friendly and playful.

Herr Slade. But he is a Rottie so the breed is vicious so is your dog.


Me: you’re an idiot
 
In other words, you are upset the Democratic candidate didn't win, but you don't know why.
That's kinda the point. I sincerely gave trump a fair evaluation, and I personally don't see why certain groups support him. I can usually understand why even if I disagree with their choice. I guess I'm missing something, so I ask questions.
 
I didn't think there were enough crazies to reelect that disgusting leader of a failed insurrection. I'll still oppose his harmful behavior in any way I can, but there is nothing left to do but accept reality and move on and hope he doesn't do too much damage for the next president to repair.
Again, imagine you are raising two children, both you and your spouse/partner work, and together you make between 80-90K. Or say 100K in a higher tax blue state.

Do you want lower tax bracket or some tax credit that requires you to not work? I think the former.

But the progressive agenda cannot abide that. And progressives were not always that "channeled."
 
That's kinda the point. I sincerely gave trump a fair evaluation, and I personally don't see why certain groups support him. I can usually understand why even if I disagree with their choice. I guess I'm missing something, so I ask questions.
But you don't ask questions, you just drool out Kool Aide on the message board.
 
I didn't think there were enough crazies to reelect that disgusting leader of a failed insurrection. I'll still oppose his harmful behavior in any way I can, but there is nothing left to do but accept reality and move on and hope he doesn't do too much damage for the next president to repair.
You only think that because youre a weird fringe voter. The majority loves Trump. You are in the minority.
 
Refresh my memory. What question are you referring to?.
Exactly. It's fairly easy to follow the links (bread crumbs) back to the original post I made, two click's and you're there.
 
I am reasonable. His behavior wasn't justifying before the election. Courts have found him guilty of a wide range of unethical behaviors. That all goes away now because of an election. Nobody should be above the law.
Apparently the democrats had no one that could beat a felon? That says far more about you than you might think.
 
Exactly. It's fairly easy to follow the links (bread crumbs) back to the original post I made, two click's and you're there.
Something to do with Clinton and his foundation. Clinton was a great president who should have kept it in his pants. His foundation was ethical.
 
Something to do with Clinton and his foundation. Clinton was a great president who should have kept it in his pants. His foundation was ethical.
So Bill Clinton, great president, we can therefore look past his sexual improprieties in and outside the oval office or before he was president, when he settled with Paul Jones and their sexual harassment lawsuit?
 
I didn't think there were enough crazies to reelect that disgusting leader of a failed insurrection. I'll still oppose his harmful behavior in any way I can, but there is nothing left to do but accept reality and move on and hope he doesn't do too much damage for the next president to repair.


:trolls::trolls::trolls:

.
 
Back
Top Bottom