I thought the Constitution was supposed to be important to liberals?

[IDIOCRACY]

I thought the Constitution was supposed to be important to liberals?​

We wrote it

No, you really didn't, promise

 

[IDIOCRACY]

the 2nd A was supposed to cover that..

Yep

 

[IDIOCRACY]

~~~~~~
Newsom may soon take that right from the citizens. He's already limits the capacity of magazines to hold no more than 10 rounds of ammunition. This restriction is part of the state's efforts to reduce gun violence and enhance public safety.
There are also strict regulations for concealed carry, prohibiting firearms in numerous public places deemed sensitive, such as parks, schools, and museums. These laws are currently facing legal challenges, with debates ongoing about their constitutionality under the Second Amendment.

I haven't checked in a while, but you couldn't by a 10 round magazine covid time...

Oh yeah, common sense gun control. U need a gun, right.......Time out, cut, action in 2 minutes.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Imagine, even if you had a license, in event lives are at risk one must call timeout, so you have time to unlock your safe space, and then load the handgun with state approved bullets.

Nice thing is the criminals don't have to follow those rules.

No, a Nevada resident cannot carry a concealed firearm in California based on a Nevada concealed carry permit. California does not recognize concealed carry permits from other states. However, Nevada residents can transport unloaded firearms in their vehicles under specific conditions, such as being unloaded and locked in the trunk or a locked container.

Here's a link for board sake.......

Google Search

Every country has either a codified or uncodified constitution. There's only one that forever and a day goes on about theirs. The planet doesn't know why.

 

[rightwinger]

No, you really didn't, promise

Our founders were all liberals
Conservatives defended the crown

 

[Seymour Flops]

Ca. Doesnt allow non residents to conceal carry. Good thing the criminals don't have to follow the rules....

part of the requirements for conceal carry in ca.

• Residency:
  You must be a resident of California and reside in the city or county where you are applying.

Since they allow illegal aliens to pay in-state tuition in their colleges, I assume the same applies to residency for the purpose of concealed carry?

 

[Votto]

I thought the Constitution was supposed to be important to liberals?​

We wrote it

Yes, you rewrite it every day.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes, you rewrite it every day.

Give examples

 

[Auld Phart]

Evidently MAGATs like to kill their families with theirs

more than liberals do?

(hopefully you have a link)

 

[Auld Phart]

Liberals are democrats so why would the constitution not be imprtant to them.

Why is gun issues a measure of what is important.

The constitution was written years ago when guns were a necessity with minor police service and was necessary for hunting for food and protection from whatever was a threat.

Wake up the times have changed.

protection from whatever was a threat.

there are threats that carrying a firearm makes necessary.
do you think criminals are going to give up their weapons, and just ask nicely for your wallet?

 

[Votto]

Give examples

How about from the Father of the Constitution, James Madison?

"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited Government established by the people of America."

And to think, the notion of "changing" our gun laws to match that of the Left. You kids want us all to beleive that the intent of the gun laws were ONLY for the use of militia, thus overlooking the rich history of gun ownership in America that refutes that.

There were no debates about "taking guns" from law abiding citizens in the US since the Constitution was written, but we are somehow suppose to believe that was their intent all along?

No.

I grew up being lectured by the Left that the Constitution was a "living" and "breathing" document that is forever changing, which is a blatant lie. They just wish to manipulate it and subvert it any damn way they please.

 

[westwall]

Especially brown criminals, the feral types.

Trust me, there are plenty of white monsters too.

 

[rightwinger]

How about from the Father of the Constitution, James Madison?

"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited Government established by the people of America."

And to think, the notion of "changing" our gun laws to match that of the Left. You kids want us all to beleive that the intent of the gun laws were ONLY for the use of militia, thus overlooking the rich history of gun ownership in America that refutes that.

There were no debates about "taking guns" from law abiding citizens in the US since the Constitution was written, but we are somehow suppose to believe that was their intent all along?

I grew up being lectured by the Left that the Constitution was a "living" and "breathing" document that is forever changing, which is a blatant lie. They just wish to manipulate it and subvert it any damn way they please.

James Madison was a Liberal

 

[westwall]

That is true, but back then liberal meant "liberty FROM government". You people are not liberals, you are statists, the exact OPPOSITE of liberal.

 

[Votto]

James Madison was a Liberal

Really?

Would you agree with Madison on this then?

According to the father of the Constitution the powers delegated to the central government “are few and defined and those that remain in the States are numerous and indefinite.” Fed #45.

Madison also explained that those powers are “reserved to external objects” of “war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce.” He also stated that the central government’s power to tax is intended to be limited to those powers. Fed #45

Should we completely disband the entire Federal Leviathan created by Progressives?

Would you help Trump, for example, disband the "Department of Education"?

 

[rightwinger]

That is true, but back then liberal meant "liberty FROM government". You people are not liberals, you are statists, the exact OPPOSITE of liberal.

Liberty meant all men created equal (no monarchy) and representative government

 

[westwall]

Liberty meant all men created equal (no monarchy) and representative government

Correct, liberty FROM government. My how you have changed.

 

[westwall]

James Madison was a Liberal

Correct. The opposite of you.

 

[rightwinger]

Really?

Would you agree with Madison on this then?

According to the father of the Constitution the powers delegated to the central government “are few and defined and those that remain in the States are numerous and indefinite.” Fed #45.

Madison also explained that those powers are “reserved to external objects” of “war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce.” He also stated that the central government’s power to tax is intended to be limited to those powers. Fed #45

Should we completely disband the entire Federal Leviathan created by Progressives?

Would you help Trump, for example, disband the "Department of Education"?

At the time, the US had no choice but a small government.
Our states were disbursed and we had an agrarian economy

 

[Votto]

Liberty meant all men created equal (no monarchy) and representative government

But the Left, your democrat party, has worked tirelessly to centralize power to the Federal level. Then when the head of that centralized behemoth is someone you don't like, you all of a sudden throw a "no kings" fit after given them so much power.

It's a cross between being retarded and insane.