eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 73,495
- 38,506
- 2,605
That same question has been asked by many for a long time.................And as always the politicians play PC games and refuse to fight it as a War or do what is necessary to end it our at least cripple the enemy.ISIS is another bunch nuts in a long line of nuts who want ISLAM to rule the World...............
The World and the United States will have no choice but to eventually deal with them.......and their kind...........
Do it now or later regionally as they force it...............
It's a shit sandwich, and no one likes that............but it's the real deal and ignoring it only allows it to grow........
True. It's a terrible smelly sandwich. I am saying that we need to start doing things OUR way. If these people want us to get involved and make sacrifices, then it is to be on OUR terms, not theirs. We decide when the region is stable enough to pull out. I'm also really tired of the US having to play mommy or daddy all the time. Why can't someone else deal with them? Why not just let the Egyptians, and some of those other ME countries deal with it? What about the Brits? Why does it HAVE to be the US?
We don't need a prolonged occupation..............I've said for a very long time............get in...........kill as many as possible...........and leave...................staying just invites the same things that happen to Israel all the time..........
ISIS can be dealt a crippling blow, without that many troops if you are willing to fight it like a War and not like your the International police.....................which is stupid and just lets these things drag on................
Most of the population of Syria has been displaced.........Well over half the population.........in ISIS controlled areas the collateral damage would be minimized as these places are ghost towns in many cases.................
LEVEL THE TOWNS.................and end this bs.