The Pattern of Democrat Presidents' Weakness (Obama & Biden) Triggering Russian Aggression

Biden's weakness led to the second Russian invasion of Ukraine. Obama's weakness led to the first invasion of Ukraine.

Biden ordered the chaotic withdrawal that led to the deaths of 13 servicemembers. Trump had already left office.

Russia doesn't need to pay anyone to see the pattern.

DemoKKKrats seem oblivious to the fact that we watched their party cozy up to the Soviets (and then the Russians) for DECADES. It was only in 2016, when Hillary Clinton decided she could make a lot of money starting a war with Russia, that suddenly the Dems started pretending otherwise.
 
Not going to happen. America ain't buying what Democrats are peddling
.

Things to remember about democrats -- They told us there can be no peace between us, then act surprised when we act like there can be no peace between us.


.
 
DemoKKKrats seem oblivious to the fact that we watched their party cozy up to the Soviets (and then the Russians) for DECADES. It was only in 2016, when Hillary Clinton decided she could make a lot of money starting a war with Russia, that suddenly the Dems started pretending otherwise.
:auiqs.jpg:
 
DemoKKKrats seem oblivious to the fact that we watched their party cozy up to the Soviets (and then the Russians) for DECADES. It was only in 2016, when Hillary Clinton decided she could make a lot of money starting a war with Russia, that suddenly the Dems started pretending otherwise.


"Ted Kennedy's Soviet Gambit
Aug 28, 2009, 12:01am EDT



Picking his way through the Soviet archives that Boris Yeltsin had just thrown open, in 1991 Tim Sebastian, a reporter for the London Times, came across an arresting memorandum. Composed in 1983 by Victor Chebrikov, the top man at the KGB, the memorandum was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the entire USSR. The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy.

"On 9-10 May of this year," the May 14 memorandum explained, "Sen. Edward Kennedy's close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow." (Tunney was Kennedy's law school roommate and a former Democratic senator from California.) "The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov."

Kennedy's message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. "The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations," the memorandum stated. "These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.""

 
"Ted Kennedy's Soviet Gambit
Aug 28, 2009, 12:01am EDT



Picking his way through the Soviet archives that Boris Yeltsin had just thrown open, in 1991 Tim Sebastian, a reporter for the London Times, came across an arresting memorandum. Composed in 1983 by Victor Chebrikov, the top man at the KGB, the memorandum was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the entire USSR. The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy.

"On 9-10 May of this year," the May 14 memorandum explained, "Sen. Edward Kennedy's close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow." (Tunney was Kennedy's law school roommate and a former Democratic senator from California.) "The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov."

Kennedy's message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. "The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations," the memorandum stated. "These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.""

Send to ‘History’ forum.

Distraction noted. :cool:
 
2013: Obama's "red line" is crossed by chemical weapons being used in Syria. There is no serious US military response.

2014: Putin invades Ukraine for the first time.
Recheck your premise

The Obama-Biden regime did something on Decemer 2013 and February 2014 which affects your timeline.
 
Are you a hypocrite? If you have said or written or applauded some version of the sentiment that Russians & Ukrainians are dying every day and trump is just trying to end the war but you have never said, written or applauded statements begging for Biden & trump to save the children in Gaza then you’re a hypocrite.
 
When Moscow wants some propaganda repeated, the Trump cutists here all jump to obey.

Why? Because Moscow knows Republicans will work for Moscow. It takes surprisingly little money to buy them off.
Have you ever heard the old saying “ you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar”? Vilifying someone you are trying to negotiate with is counter-productive. Stroking a dictator’s ego costs nothing but can yield real dividends. Trump may be a blowhard and borderline sociopath, but he is a proven negotiator who gets results. Trump will work for the best possible peace in Ukraine, but as much as I hate to admit it, any peace will have to give Putin at least some of what he wants, or needs. Without something he can point to as a victory, Putin faces a very real death sentence from his rivals inside Russia. He will not let that happen, he’s too much the KGB apparatchik that he spent most of his life being. Both sides in the Ukraine war need a victory of some sort. I would prefer to see Russia utterly defeated and pushed back within its 2013 borders, but even with a great deal of western support, Ukraine lacks the manpower to do that.
 
Have you ever heard the old saying “ you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar”? Vilifying someone you are trying to negotiate with is counter-productive. Stroking a dictator’s ego costs nothing but can yield real dividends. Trump may be a blowhard and borderline sociopath, but he is a proven negotiator who gets results. Trump will work for the best possible peace in Ukraine, but as much as I hate to admit it, any peace will have to give Putin at least some of what he wants, or needs. Without something he can point to as a victory, Putin faces a very real death sentence from his rivals inside Russia. He will not let that happen, he’s too much the KGB apparatchik that he spent most of his life being. Both sides in the Ukraine war need a victory of some sort. I would prefer to see Russia utterly defeated and pushed back within its 2013 borders, but even with a great deal of western support, Ukraine lacks the manpower to do that.
Very few people actually believe Trump is a good negotiator. He uses bully tactics; that’s not negotiation.
 
So you admit that you were just speaking baselessly — yet without the candor to say as much until you got called on it.
Just like you. Why would you consider what I say baseless, when you do the same? I guess because you’re the one without candor.
 
Have you ever heard the old saying “ you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar”? Vilifying someone you are trying to negotiate with is counter-productive. Stroking a dictator’s ego costs nothing but can yield real dividends. Trump may be a blowhard and borderline sociopath, but he is a proven negotiator who gets results. Trump will work for the best possible peace in Ukraine, but as much as I hate to admit it, any peace will have to give Putin at least some of what he wants, or needs. Without something he can point to as a victory, Putin faces a very real death sentence from his rivals inside Russia. He will not let that happen, he’s too much the KGB apparatchik that he spent most of his life being. Both sides in the Ukraine war need a victory of some sort. I would prefer to see Russia utterly defeated and pushed back within its 2013 borders, but even with a great deal of western support, Ukraine lacks the manpower to do that.
"Vilifying someone you are trying to negotiate with is counter-productive" Well, that is what Trump did with Zelenksy.
 
Back
Top Bottom