berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 22,654
- 18,912
- 2,320
The last time an American president deployed the U.S. military domestically under the Insurrection Act — during the deadly Los Angeles riots in 1992 — Douglas Ollivant was there. Ollivant, then a young Army first lieutenant, says things went fairly smoothly because it was somebody else — the cops — doing the head-cracking to restore order, not his 7th Infantry Division. He and his troops didn’t have to detain or shoot at anyone.
“There was real sensitivity about keeping federal troops away from the front lines,” said Ollivant, who was ordered in by President George H.W. Bush as rioters in central-south LA set fire to buildings, assaulted police and bystanders, pelted cars with rocks and smashed store windows in the aftermath of the videotaped police beating of Rodney King, a Black motorist. “They tried to keep us in support roles, backing up the police.”
But some in the U.S. military fear next time could be different. According to nearly a dozen retired officers and current military lawyers, as well as scholars who teach at West Point and Annapolis, an intense if quiet debate is underway inside the U.S. military community about what orders it would be obliged to obey if President-elect Donald Trump decides to follow through on his previous warnings that he might deploy troops against what he deems domestic threats, including political enemies, dissenters and immigrants.
It's already a Cat 3 tornado of chaos and Dotard hasn't even taken office yet. There's the upcoming nomination hearings for his mostly unqualified nominees, the remnants of his criminal cases, the promise of 100 EO's one day 1 (how many will be unconstitutional?), the plans for tariffs, for mass deportation, for criminalizing dissent. I follow the news and it's still difficult to remember everything.
“There was real sensitivity about keeping federal troops away from the front lines,” said Ollivant, who was ordered in by President George H.W. Bush as rioters in central-south LA set fire to buildings, assaulted police and bystanders, pelted cars with rocks and smashed store windows in the aftermath of the videotaped police beating of Rodney King, a Black motorist. “They tried to keep us in support roles, backing up the police.”
But some in the U.S. military fear next time could be different. According to nearly a dozen retired officers and current military lawyers, as well as scholars who teach at West Point and Annapolis, an intense if quiet debate is underway inside the U.S. military community about what orders it would be obliged to obey if President-elect Donald Trump decides to follow through on his previous warnings that he might deploy troops against what he deems domestic threats, including political enemies, dissenters and immigrants.
It's already a Cat 3 tornado of chaos and Dotard hasn't even taken office yet. There's the upcoming nomination hearings for his mostly unqualified nominees, the remnants of his criminal cases, the promise of 100 EO's one day 1 (how many will be unconstitutional?), the plans for tariffs, for mass deportation, for criminalizing dissent. I follow the news and it's still difficult to remember everything.
