[...]
I do not think our combat women and men were there to maim and sew slaughter. Except for the exceedingly dense or the exceedingly gung-ho, the average soldier knew this was a war of choice and that the Iraqi people were not our enemy by and large.
And I wonder how much that awareness contributed to the inordinately large number of PTSD diagnoses ascribed to Iraq and Afghanistan veterans compared with the relatively low number of "shell-shock" and
battle fatigue cases deriving from World War Two -- in spite of the relatively more severe and punishing conditions endured by the WW-II veterans.
Imagine you are placed in a position to kill someone who never did a thing to you and was opposing you in the righteous act of defending his homeland and family. If you have no choice but to do it or go to prison, you do it.
Now imagine you kill someone who has invaded your homeland and is oppressing you and yours. Do you believe the difference in those two circumstances would affect your psyche differently?
Of course they would. As for
then and now
Differences....the culture is different as are childrens' upbringing. You don't get a shiny coin for killing your enemy in real life. But moreover....in WWII guys would take weeks if not months to muster out and catch a troop ship back to the US and then face a several day bus or train ride back home. Today, you can be home by week's end and your time to get acclimated and prepare mentally is condensed.
I would wager that Mr. Kyle knew the same thing. Orders were orders and if it meant that person over there was to be taken out, they got taken out. For that I cannot blame them.
Of course we can't blame them. But blame is not the issue. Understanding the effect of guilt is -- as Dostoevsky has succinctly pointed out.
The movie was the topic....was it not?