I recall being suspicious of this at the time.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
33,261
Reaction score
27,119
Points
2,820

Trump’s team skips FBI background checks for some Cabinet picks​

President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team is bypassing traditional FBI background checks for at least some of his Cabinet picks while using private companies to conduct vetting of potential candidates for administration jobs, people close to the transition planning say.

Trump and his allies believe the FBI system is slow and plagued with issues that could stymie the president-elect’s plan to quickly begin the work of implementing his agenda, people briefed on the plans said. Critics say the intrusive background checks sometimes turn up embarrassing information used to inflict political damage.


Given Don's prior experience during trump 1.0 it wasn't surprising he'd be reluctant to allow his picks to be exposed to FBI scrutiny.

Officials rejected Jared Kushner for top secret security clearance, but were overruled​

Kushner's was one of at least 30 cases in which Kline overruled career security experts and approved a top-secret clearance for incoming Trump officials despite unfavorable information, the two sources said.

All of which puts this in the proper perspective.

Border czar Tom Homan didn’t receive normal background check during bribery probe

In early January, several days before Donald Trump’s inauguration, a Justice Department lawyer passed an envelope across a wide desk to a top Trump transition official. Enclosed was a bombshell, typed up in a one-page summary, according to two people briefed on the meeting.

As he read the contents of the envelope, the official, Emil Bove (
the guy who would later tell DoJ subordinates to ignore court orders), closed his eyes and grimaced, according to the people, who requested anonymity to discuss a sensitive case. It revealed that Tom Homan — at that time, a frequent companion of Trump’s on the campaign trail who had publicly boasted he would be joining Trump’s administration to lead his immigrant deportation strategy — was the subject of an ongoing bribery investigation. Undercover FBI agents posing as private contractors had recorded him accepting $50,000 in cash in exchange for what they believed was Homan’s vow to help get border enforcement contracts in the new Trump administration.

A small group of career lawyers at the Justice Department felt an urgency to share this sensitive information with the president-elect’s team as soon as possible, hoping to head off potential embarrassment and a security clearance problem before Trump picked his future Cabinet and top appointees.


Heck, when you pick a nominee to be AG who was investigated for sex trafficking (wait..WHAT!), and a nominee for border czar who was investigated for taking a bribe (wait...WHAT!), the last thing you want is to have those nominees go through the normal background check process.

After all, loyalists like Pam and Kash had yet to be installed in key DoJ posts. Meaning that for the folks doing a check on Homan, the tape of him taking $50K in cash was..........let's just say it was "problematic."

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a White House briefing that “Mr. Homan never took the $50,000 that you’re referring to” despite an internal DOJ document stating that he did.

"These aren't the drones you're looking for, move along," says Karoline.

Do not post in red. Thank you kindly!

--TK
 

Trump’s team skips FBI background checks for some Cabinet picks​

President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team is bypassing traditional FBI background checks for at least some of his Cabinet picks while using private companies to conduct vetting of potential candidates for administration jobs, people close to the transition planning say.

Trump and his allies believe the FBI system is slow and plagued with issues that could stymie the president-elect’s plan to quickly begin the work of implementing his agenda, people briefed on the plans said. Critics say the intrusive background checks sometimes turn up embarrassing information used to inflict political damage.


Given Don's prior experience during trump 1.0 it wasn't surprising he'd be reluctant to allow his picks to be exposed to FBI scrutiny.

Officials rejected Jared Kushner for top secret security clearance, but were overruled​

Kushner's was one of at least 30 cases in which Kline overruled career security experts and approved a top-secret clearance for incoming Trump officials despite unfavorable information, the two sources said.

All of which puts this in the proper perspective.

Border czar Tom Homan didn’t receive normal background check during bribery probe

In early January, several days before Donald Trump’s inauguration, a Justice Department lawyer passed an envelope across a wide desk to a top Trump transition official. Enclosed was a bombshell, typed up in a one-page summary, according to two people briefed on the meeting.

As he read the contents of the envelope, the official, Emil Bove (
the guy who would later tell DoJ subordinates to ignore court orders), closed his eyes and grimaced, according to the people, who requested anonymity to discuss a sensitive case. It revealed that Tom Homan — at that time, a frequent companion of Trump’s on the campaign trail who had publicly boasted he would be joining Trump’s administration to lead his immigrant deportation strategy — was the subject of an ongoing bribery investigation. Undercover FBI agents posing as private contractors had recorded him accepting $50,000 in cash in exchange for what they believed was Homan’s vow to help get border enforcement contracts in the new Trump administration.

A small group of career lawyers at the Justice Department felt an urgency to share this sensitive information with the president-elect’s team as soon as possible, hoping to head off potential embarrassment and a security clearance problem before Trump picked his future Cabinet and top appointees.


Heck, when you pick a nominee to be AG who was investigated for sex trafficking (wait..WHAT!), and a nominee for border czar who was investigated for taking a bribe (wait...WHAT!), the last thing you want is to have those nominees go through the normal background check process.

After all, loyalists like Pam and Kash had yet to be installed in key DoJ posts. Meaning that for the folks doing a check on Homan, the tape of him taking $50K in cash was..........let's just say it was "problematic."

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a White House briefing that “Mr. Homan never took the $50,000 that you’re referring to” despite an internal DOJ document stating that he did.

"These aren't the drones you're looking for, move along," says Karoline.
you've been suspicious of anything trump since 2015.


What's new?
 
Trump couldn’t pass a background check, why should his staff?
If he were apply for a job as a custodian with his history of sexual assaults, stealing money from a charity, orchestrating a subversion of the Constitution, refusing to comply with a subpoena for stolen classified docs, no one in their right mind would hire him.
 
Trump couldn’t pass a background check, why should his staff?
There are no rules, there is no bottom, there is no floor, there are no standards.

And the credulous rubes are fine with it, because they're "at war". And because so many of them are simply ignorant.

It will take many years for us to be a serious country again. Just getting back to that would be an accomplishment.
 
Which is why things are collapsing. We accept corruption as long as it's the "right" kind.
As MS NOW prepared to break the news of the bribery probe, Homan did not respond to requests for comment and the White House said the investigation began under the Biden administration and Trump appointees concluded it was politically motivated. A day later, in an interview on FOX News, Homan told anchor Laura Ingram: “I did nothing criminal. I did nothing illegal,” but stopped short of saying he did not take any cash.
 
As MS NOW prepared to break the news of the bribery probe, Homan did not respond to requests for comment and the White House said the investigation began under the Biden administration and Trump appointees concluded it was politically motivated. A day later, in an interview on FOX News, Homan told anchor Laura Ingram: “I did nothing criminal. I did nothing illegal,” but stopped short of saying he did not take any cash.

I'm not sure the point. I point out how corruption is widespread and you post something to convince me there is corruption?
 
There are no rules, there is no bottom, there is no floor, there are no standards.

And the credulous rubes are fine with it, because they're "at war".

It will take many years for us to be a serious country again.
Beyond the damage to the environment, weakening our security, increasing the debt, the most insidious harm Don has inflicted is the erosion of our political culture. Nurtured for 250 years it has been the thing that bound us together since the founding. That there are some taboos you just don't break even when the law doesn't expressly forbid them. He's shattered all of them.
 
15th post
I'm not sure the point. I point out how corruption is widespread and you post something to convince me there is corruption?
Rather than drift off to a discussion based on false equivalences I tried to get the focus back on the subject at hand.
 
Given his track record for over 50 years, I wouldn't trust him to deliver a pizza.
When you take a step back and look at his resume......... his history of sexual assaults, stealing money from a charity, orchestrating a subversion of the Constitution, pathological lying, bankruptcies, refusing to comply with a subpoena for stolen classified docs.........it's more than a little shocking anyone thought he was fit to be a dog catcher let alone the prez.
 
Beyond the damage to the environment, weakening our security, increasing the debt, the most insidious harm Don has inflicted is the erosion of our political culture. Nurtured for 250 years it has been the thing that bound us together since the founding. That there are some taboos you just don't break even when the law doesn't expressly forbid them. He's shattered all of them.
Yes, and that may be the worst thing he'd done, of all.

These people have been convinced by the voices they trust that, because they're miserable and feel victimized, everything has to be torn down. All or nothing. One or the other.

They give no thought to the big picture ramifications. None. And they clearly lack the capacity to do so.
 
Back
Top Bottom