Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Someone calling a woman a feckless **** doesn’t offend the left someone screaming fuck Trump on national TV doesn’t offend the left someone talking about kidnapping the Presidents son and putting him in a cage with pedophiles doesn’t offend the left but a jacket does. Pardon me if I don’t take your alleged offense the slightest bit seriously.This is offensive?She has a limitless wardrobeNope to redo the Sigmund Freud saying sometimes a cigar is just a cigar sometimes a jacket is just a jacket.This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
Why choose something so offensive?
View attachment 200370
View attachment 200371
Let’s see?
She is looking into a situation where her husband tore 2000 children away from their parents and sent them thousands of miles apart
She chooses a jacket that says...I don’t care, Do U?
What the fuck is the matter with Trumps?
We know how important accuracy in photography is to Iceberg.How many children did she visit? Can we see the pictures?simply because you choose to limit your views of someone doesn't mean they've limited themselves as well.Why would a First Lady have something like that in her wardrobe let alone wear it?This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
She obviously cares about her outfits. That is all she brings to the table as Fitst Lady
No, I don't think she was. I don't know WHAT she was thinking--but I'm quite sure it wasn't that.She was sending a messageShe has a limitless wardrobeNope to redo the Sigmund Freud saying sometimes a cigar is just a cigar sometimes a jacket is just a jacket.This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
Why choose something so offensive?
Does anyone really think she bought a 40 dollar jacket?
This whole thing had to be staged, I bet her panties cost more than 40 bucks each.
I don’t care about Hispanic Children
Your first three examples are all hypotheticalsSomeone calling a woman a feckless **** doesn’t offend the left someone screaming fuck Trump on national TV doesn’t offend the left someone talking about kidnapping the Presidents son and putting him in a cage with pedophiles doesn’t offend the left but a jacket does. Pardon me if I don’t take your alleged offense the slightest bit seriously.This is offensive?She has a limitless wardrobeNope to redo the Sigmund Freud saying sometimes a cigar is just a cigar sometimes a jacket is just a jacket.This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
Why choose something so offensive?
View attachment 200370
View attachment 200371
Let’s see?
She is looking into a situation where her husband tore 2000 children away from their parents and sent them thousands of miles apart
She chooses a jacket that says...I don’t care, Do U?
What the fuck is the matter with Trumps?
For the eighty-hundredth time, Obama and Bush did not do this. They considered it, saw the difficulties and didn't do it.This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
I care as much as the Progressives cared about those illegal children and their parents during Obama eight years which is very little!
Melania is saying, "I really don't care my husband fucks around on me."This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
No, I don't think she was. I don't know WHAT she was thinking--but I'm quite sure it wasn't that.She was sending a messageShe has a limitless wardrobeNope to redo the Sigmund Freud saying sometimes a cigar is just a cigar sometimes a jacket is just a jacket.This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
Why choose something so offensive?
Does anyone really think she bought a 40 dollar jacket?
This whole thing had to be staged, I bet her panties cost more than 40 bucks each.
I don’t care about Hispanic Children
You're wasting your time. The parrots have been told this lie and they want to believe it is true. So they will keep repeating the lie to make it more true.For the eighty-hundredth time, Obama and Bush did not do this. They considered it, saw the difficulties and didn't do it.This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
I care as much as the Progressives cared about those illegal children and their parents during Obama eight years which is very little!
It's not the photo. It's the misrepresentation about it. You know, THE LYINGWe know how important accuracy in photography is to Iceberg.How many children did she visit? Can we see the pictures?simply because you choose to limit your views of someone doesn't mean they've limited themselves as well.Why would a First Lady have something like that in her wardrobe let alone wear it?This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
She obviously cares about her outfits. That is all she brings to the table as Fitst Lady
Except they did. There is photo evidence. Hell half the photos the media put out over the last few months were under Obama but they of course lied about that too.For the eighty-hundredth time, Obama and Bush did not do this. They considered it, saw the difficulties and didn't do it.This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
I care as much as the Progressives cared about those illegal children and their parents during Obama eight years which is very little!
Nope. There are photos of kids who came across the border ALONE, which you dolts have been told by your propagandists are kids who came with parents and were separated from them.Except they did. There is photo evidenceFor the eighty-hundredth time, Obama and Bush did not do this. They considered it, saw the difficulties and didn't do it.This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
I care as much as the Progressives cared about those illegal children and their parents during Obama eight years which is very little!
It's not the photo. It's the misrepresentation about it. You know, THE LYINGWe know how important accuracy in photography is to Iceberg.How many children did she visit? Can we see the pictures?simply because you choose to limit your views of someone doesn't mean they've limited themselves as well.Why would a First Lady have something like that in her wardrobe let alone wear it?This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
She obviously cares about her outfits. That is all she brings to the table as Fitst Lady
You're right, of course.You're wasting your time. The parrots have been told this lie and they want to believe it is true. So they will keep repeating the lie to make it more true.For the eighty-hundredth time, Obama and Bush did not do this. They considered it, saw the difficulties and didn't do it.This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
I care as much as the Progressives cared about those illegal children and their parents during Obama eight years which is very little!
Nothing you can do about it.
Republicans don't understand because most simply don't have these kinds of feelings. If you don't have empathy nor compassion, you can't be expected to display them.
Republicans don't understand because most simply don't have these kinds of feelings. If you don't have empathy nor compassion, you can't be expected to display them.
That is the core of American Conservatives
We do not care about anyone but ourselves
Watching brown people suffer gives them orgasms
It's not the photo. It's the misrepresentation about it. You know, THE LYINGWe know how important accuracy in photography is to Iceberg.How many children did she visit? Can we see the pictures?simply because you choose to limit your views of someone doesn't mean they've limited themselves as well.Why would a First Lady have something like that in her wardrobe let alone wear it?This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
She obviously cares about her outfits. That is all she brings to the table as Fitst Lady
It's not the photo. It's the misrepresentation about it. You know, THE LYINGWe know how important accuracy in photography is to Iceberg.How many children did she visit? Can we see the pictures?simply because you choose to limit your views of someone doesn't mean they've limited themselves as well.Why would a First Lady have something like that in her wardrobe let alone wear it?
She obviously cares about her outfits. That is all she brings to the table as Fitst Lady
there was no lying
no one ever said that particular child was separated.
the problem with trumplings, like yourself, is that you're too fucking stupid to think for yourselves
What is the LIE?It's not the photo. It's the misrepresentation about it. You know, THE LYINGWe know how important accuracy in photography is to Iceberg.How many children did she visit? Can we see the pictures?simply because you choose to limit your views of someone doesn't mean they've limited themselves as well.Why would a First Lady have something like that in her wardrobe let alone wear it?This was CLEARLY a message to the media that likes to savage the first ladys wardrobe choices. Just look at the ugly ass jacket she wrote the message on.
Its meaning is CLEAR and only the most hardcore of haters will refuse to admit it.
The end result is the media act like children and lose their minds over the jacket just as some of you have.
Are you really so stupid you don't get it?
Either way I really don't care, do you?
She obviously cares about her outfits. That is all she brings to the table as Fitst Lady
your 3rd sentence sounds like most seasoned male politicians....I'm sorry, I cant change my entire life of rearing and training that my parents gave....you won't let yourself see it.if there was an ounce of good light, in Trump, I would see it... I'm still waiting....you are always going to see them in the worst possible light.It's a Spring 2016 line, Zara jacket and has not been for sale for a couple of years, other than buying it used....
so Trump acting like the jacket was meant for the media, is kind of lame... I think she bought it 2 years ago, because she liked it!
Though I would not be surprised if it was Trump that asked her to wear it.... so to cause a media frenzy.... to deflect.... which he's really really good at....
that's on you. not them.
anything he says or does you will see in the worst possible light, even if it means you contradict yourself along the way. i do much of the same thing to hillary, for example. you think it's crazy and beyond reasonable as you've said many times.
then you turn around and do it to your object of hate.
it's the same thing, just different points of view. if hating on all hillary does makes someone bad/ignorant/stupid - whatever; doing that to trump is the same exact thing.
And Donald Trump, is the kind of man my parents taught me, to stay away from....
he's a womanizer, a thug, a multi time adulterer, a liar, a cheat, a thief, boastful, arrogant, lacks empathy, a divider, lawless, in-compassionate, greedy, godless etc etc etc......
If you have some good traits hidden in your bags of tricks for him, please, by all means, let me know about them....
