I realize I'm asking a lot of trump supporters but......

Your gaslighting isn't working.
ROFLMAO! you really don't understand the concept of free speech, do You? Up to this point I thought you were just being intentionally obtuse so you could continue with your idiotic, hyper-partisan narrative hoping nobody would notice but apparently, I was wrong.

Sheesh... get some help.
 
Is the premise of your post that Joe Biden picked a lineup of pro America middle of the road highly experienced and qualified people for his staff?
Highly qualified? Yes. You don't seriously think trump picked his nominees because they are pro middle America, do you? They are unequivocally pro trump. That's all that matters to him.
 
Do you believe there are more than two genders?
No. What does that have to do with your hypocrisy?

Think about what your reaction would be if..................

A Dem prez-elect had chosen numerous people to staff his admin who previously worked at MSNBC or CNN.
A Dem prez-elect had chosen a number of unqualified cabinet nominees with a history of sexual abuse.
A Dem prez-elect had promised to use the DoJ to exact revenge on political opponents or people involved in his prosecutions but offered no evidence of any crimes they committed.
A Dem prez-elect had given enormous power inside his admin to someone who contributed $250M to his campaign.
A Dem prez-elect had sat idly by as said contributor threatened to use his enormous wealth to intimidate any member of the party who dared to oppose the prez-elect.
 
.........I'd like you to consider a flip of the script. Think about what your reaction would be if..................

A Dem prez-elect had chosen numerous people to staff his admin who previously worked at MSNBC or CNN.
A Dem prez-elect had chosen a number of unqualified cabinet nominees with a history of sexual abuse.
A Dem prez-elect had promised to use the DoJ to exact revenge on political opponents or people involved in his prosecutions but offered no evidence of any crimes they committed.
A Dem prez-elect had given enormous power inside his admin to someone who contributed $250M to his campaign.
A Dem prez-elect had sat idly by as said contributor threatened to use his enormous wealth to intimidate any member of the party who dared to oppose the prez-elect.

Elon Musk signals he’ll go beyond supporting Trump to serve as his political enforcer


DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A week after President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, Elon Musk said his political action committee would “play a significant role in primaries.”

The following week, the billionaire responded to a report that he might fund challengers to GOP House members who don’t support Trump’s nominees. “How else? There is no other way,” Musk wrote on X, which he rebranded after purchasing Twitter and moving to boost conservative voices, including his own.


What if a favorite Repub boogeyman, George Soros, had made such a huge contribution and received such a huge reward? What if Soros had biz with the government over which he was given power like Musk has? I'm speaking of the $3B+ in defense contracts Musk has with the DoD. Would that be okay with you?

Would it be okay if a figure like Musk was currying favor with the prez-elect when he had such a clear financial interest for doing so?
They couldn't care less. The voices they trust tell them they're at war, so there is no honest self-reflection. It's kill or be killed.
 
ROFLMAO! you really don't understand the concept of free speech, do You? Up to this point I thought you were just being intentionally obtuse so you could continue with your idiotic, hyper-partisan narrative hoping nobody would notice but apparently, I was wrong.

Sheesh... get some help.
I understand the concept of a now close aid to the prez-elect turning his social media platform in to a swamp infested place where Nazis, bigots, and liars go to spew their hatred.
 
They couldn't care less. The voices they trust tell them they're at war, so there is no honest self-reflection. It's kill or be killed.
Yes, but I do so enjoy getting them to wallow in their hypocrisy.
 
They couldn't care less. The voices they trust tell them they're at war, so there is no honest self-reflection. It's kill or be killed.
irony-meter.webp
 
No. What does that have to do with your hypocrisy?

Think about what your reaction would be if..................

A Dem prez-elect had chosen numerous people to staff his admin who previously worked at MSNBC or CNN.
A Dem prez-elect had chosen a number of unqualified cabinet nominees with a history of sexual abuse.
A Dem prez-elect had promised to use the DoJ to exact revenge on political opponents or people involved in his prosecutions but offered no evidence of any crimes they committed.
A Dem prez-elect had given enormous power inside his admin to someone who contributed $250M to his campaign.
A Dem prez-elect had sat idly by as said contributor threatened to use his enormous wealth to intimidate any member of the party who dared to oppose the prez-elect.
So why can’t any elected Dem say that Berg?

They are all part of a cult. They all must believe in the lie.

We already had Biden do all the things you listed.
 
Highly qualified? Yes. You don't seriously think trump picked his nominees because they are pro middle America, do you? They are unequivocally pro trump. That's all that matters to him.
Yes, and all of Biden‘s pic were unequivocally pro Democrat.

If you want to decry the partisanship built into the United States system, you are welcome to. Let you sound a little foolish when you only talk about it when there’s a Republican in office.

No other president has ever been expected to specifically select people who are disloyal to him and would work against him at every turn. I can see where they would give your side, a big advantage, but unfortunately for you it is not going to work. Not even a little bit.
 
I understand the concept of a now close aid to the prez-elect turning his social media platform in to a swamp infested place where Nazis, bigots, and liars go to spew their hatred.
You clearly don't understand it as you have (yet again) just demonstrated.

You're clearly one of the yahoos that think free speech only applies to the nonsense you happen to agree with, guess what? the world doesn't revolve around your ideology.

"Though liberals do a great deal of talking about hearing other points of view, it sometimes shocks them to learn that there are other points of view." -- William F. Buckley, Jr.
 
.........I'd like you to consider a flip of the script. Think about what your reaction would be if..................

A Dem prez-elect had chosen numerous people to staff his admin who previously worked at MSNBC or CNN.
A Dem prez-elect had chosen a number of unqualified cabinet nominees with a history of sexual abuse.
A Dem prez-elect had promised to use the DoJ to exact revenge on political opponents or people involved in his prosecutions but offered no evidence of any crimes they committed.
A Dem prez-elect had given enormous power inside his admin to someone who contributed $250M to his campaign.
A Dem prez-elect had sat idly by as said contributor threatened to use his enormous wealth to intimidate any member of the party who dared to oppose the prez-elect.

Elon Musk signals he’ll go beyond supporting Trump to serve as his political enforcer


DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A week after President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, Elon Musk said his political action committee would “play a significant role in primaries.”

The following week, the billionaire responded to a report that he might fund challengers to GOP House members who don’t support Trump’s nominees. “How else? There is no other way,” Musk wrote on X, which he rebranded after purchasing Twitter and moving to boost conservative voices, including his own.


What if a favorite Repub boogeyman, George Soros, had made such a huge contribution and received such a huge reward? What if Soros had biz with the government over which he was given power like Musk has? I'm speaking of the $3B+ in defense contracts Musk has with the DoD. Would that be okay with you?

Would it be okay if a figure like Musk was currying favor with the prez-elect when he had such a clear financial interest for doing so?

That all happened, dipshit.
 
You clearly don't understand it as you have (yet again) just demonstrated.

You're clearly one of the yahoos that think free speech only applies to the nonsense you happen to agree with, guess what? the world doesn't revolve around your ideology.

"Though liberals do a great deal of talking about hearing other points of view, it sometimes shocks them to learn that there are other points of view." -- William F. Buckley, Jr.
That all happened, dipshit.
I'm going to be getting a lot of mileage out of this one.....

EnemiesVoltaire.webp
 
By the way Trump has said he would NOT use his DOJ to go after his political opponents like Joe Biden and the Democrats did! Why do you continue to trot that lie out?
Trump also said he would repeal obamacare, and make mexico pay for the wall.

If you believe Trump, just wait a few days for when he says the opposite.
 
He didn't use the DOJ against his political opponents in his first term...yet you on the left accuse him of planning to use it THIS time around even though he's been quite clear that he views having a successful administration to be the ultimate "revenge" against those who have attacked him for eight plus years!
Actually Trump used the DOJ against his political opponents in his first term. He just wasn't very good at it.

Trump was like the gang that couldn't shoot straight. He kept shooting himself in the foot instead of hitting his target.
 
.........I'd like you to consider a flip of the script. Think about what your reaction would be if..................

A Dem prez-elect had chosen numerous people to staff his admin who previously worked at MSNBC or CNN.
A Dem prez-elect had chosen a number of unqualified cabinet nominees with a history of sexual abuse.
A Dem prez-elect had promised to use the DoJ to exact revenge on political opponents or people involved in his prosecutions but offered no evidence of any crimes they committed.
A Dem prez-elect had given enormous power inside his admin to someone who contributed $250M to his campaign.
A Dem prez-elect had sat idly by as said contributor threatened to use his enormous wealth to intimidate any member of the party who dared to oppose the prez-elect.

Elon Musk signals he’ll go beyond supporting Trump to serve as his political enforcer


DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A week after President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, Elon Musk said his political action committee would “play a significant role in primaries.”

The following week, the billionaire responded to a report that he might fund challengers to GOP House members who don’t support Trump’s nominees. “How else? There is no other way,” Musk wrote on X, which he rebranded after purchasing Twitter and moving to boost conservative voices, including his own.


What if a favorite Repub boogeyman, George Soros, had made such a huge contribution and received such a huge reward? What if Soros had biz with the government over which he was given power like Musk has? I'm speaking of the $3B+ in defense contracts Musk has with the DoD. Would that be okay with you?

Would it be okay if a figure like Musk was currying favor with the prez-elect when he had such a clear financial interest for doing so?
Why would we give a flying fuck what your side thinks about his picks? Especially after YEARS you guys of weaponizing the government against us?

Trumps picks are loyalists who will purge our corrupt government. Its exactly what WE the voters want. Its annoying that you delusionally that think your feelings on his picks should somehow matter to us at this point, so take your sad puppy dog eyes and kick rocks. :cuckoo:
 
Back
Top Bottom