postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 21,837
- 12,637
- 1,400
Like R-Kelly?Because when it comes to he said, she said, men always lose
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like R-Kelly?Because when it comes to he said, she said, men always lose
A crazy lady took Trump to court over a rape allegation backed by NOTHING but her word , dating back decades. THATS why people settle. The burdon of proof is prepostorous in these cases. It just takes a jury not liking the defendant.How many catholic priests have never been convicted, let alone charged for the rape of young boys? Yet their victims go back for decades and decades.
And the fact that the church, like Hegseth paid out "hush" money to their victims to silence them from criminal prosecution.
Sometimes the charges are true, sometimes notLike R-Kelly?
That's not what Trump learned from Roy Cohn.A crazy lady took Trump to court over a rape allegation backed by NOTHING but her word , dating back decades. THATS why people settle. The burdon of proof is prepostorous in these cases. It just takes a jury not liking the defendant.
I get it, many National Socialist asked the same thing after their party lost power....I am sure it's hard for you.............I'd like you to consider a flip of the script. Think about what your reaction would be if..................
A Dem prez-elect had chosen numerous people to staff his admin who previously worked at MSNBC or CNN.
A Dem prez-elect had chosen a number of unqualified cabinet nominees with a history of sexual abuse.
A Dem prez-elect had promised to use the DoJ to exact revenge on political opponents or people involved in his prosecutions but offered no evidence of any crimes they committed.
A Dem prez-elect had given enormous power inside his admin to someone who contributed $250M to his campaign.
A Dem prez-elect had sat idly by as said contributor threatened to use his enormous wealth to intimidate any member of the party who dared to oppose the prez-elect.
Elon Musk signals he’ll go beyond supporting Trump to serve as his political enforcer
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A week after President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, Elon Musk said his political action committee would “play a significant role in primaries.”
The following week, the billionaire responded to a report that he might fund challengers to GOP House members who don’t support Trump’s nominees. “How else? There is no other way,” Musk wrote on X, which he rebranded after purchasing Twitter and moving to boost conservative voices, including his own.
![]()
Elon Musk signals he'll go beyond supporting Trump to serve as his political enforcer
Within Trump's team, there is a feeling that Musk not only supports Trump's agenda and Cabinet appointments, but is intent on seeing them through to the point of pressuring Republicans who may be less devout.www.pbs.org
What if a favorite Repub boogeyman, George Soros, had made such a huge contribution and received such a huge reward? What if Soros had biz with the government over which he was given power like Musk has? I'm speaking of the $3B+ in defense contracts Musk has with the DoD. Would that be okay with you?
Would it be okay if a figure like Musk was currying favor with the prez-elect when he had such a clear financial interest for doing so?
Proof?I've heard that one before but I've never seen any proof of it. Care to provide some?
Trump held onto top secret government documents And we know Trump was disclosing top secrets to people who weren't authorized.Sleepy Joe actually DID use the Dept of Justice to inflict revenge on his political enemies and their families.
You forget already how Biden ordered his stooges in the FBI to conduct a panty raid on Mar a Lago and rifle through the First Lady's underwear drawer?
Trump held onto top secret government documents And we know Trump was disclosing top secrets to people who weren't authorized.
What limits? Musk contributed $250M to trump.Of course he is. Musk is the richest man on earth. He bought Twitter, and took a $24 billion loss.
Musk's Fellow Investors in X Are Part of a $24 Billion Loss Since 2022.
The average senate campaign is pocket change to him. So he could afford to "primary" all 538 people in congress, in order to make them bend to his will.
This is why there are campaign contribution limits
So far, you Biden groupies have been flailing about, shedding tears over your drubbing in the prez. election. Get over your humilistionnand learn to be graceful in losing.So far you folks have told lies about X, lies about Soros, lies about trump's DoJ, and lies about Obama and Biden's DoJ's. My apologies for backing you in to a corner.
Who is the “we” who you claim to know Trump was disclosing top secrets to.Trump held onto top secret government documents And we know Trump was disclosing top secrets to people who weren't authorized.
And now Trump doesn't even want the FBI to vet people for security clearances. Trump just wants to give them access to everything.
You should understand terms and definitions. Indictments are allegations.You should read the indictment.
You should read the indictment.
That's because a judge that Trump appointed, saw to that.That is just an allegation, President Trump was never convicted of that.
This is not the conspiracy theory forum.That's because a judge that Trump appointed, saw to that.
The people sitting around the dining hall at Mar-a-lago.Who is the “we” who you claim to know Trump was disclosing top secrets to.