I never thought I would say this, but we need more liberals on this forum. I have an idea how to attract them.

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. used the word "Negro" fifteen times in his "I have a dream" speech,

That speech was given when I was 2 years old! Times change!

 

[Friends]

That speech was given when I was 2 years old! Times change!

I would like to say that I have not changed, but I have. I used to support the civil rights movement. I do not any more. It has been followed by increases in black social pathology. It was not supposed to be that way. When we gave Negroes equal rights they were supposed to behave and perform as well as we do. Instead, the better we treat those people, the worse most of them behave.

 

[iceberg]

Maybe if a lot of the right wingers on here would start making decent arguments and stop insulting.....

Yea a liberal would never insult someone else...

 

[Damaged Eagle]

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Feeding Crows]

 

[Feeding Crows]

awesome Eagle!!!

 

[Feeding Crows]

This is bucket list stuff for me! I love it!!!

 

[Feeding Crows]

88 lines about 44 women...

 

[Gracie]

What we really "need" is a CLOSED sign hammered onto the front door of the romper room so no others come to join in there and make us all gag.

 

[Erinwltr]

I'm a former member of several heavily liberal-dominated sites.

Former because the liberals were typical in that they could not stand to have their absurdities pointed out to them with any humor whatsoever. They constantly whined about it. So, the "moderators," or the Liberal Klux Klan, as I call them, would subject me to a high-tech lynching in the form of repeated warnings for no violations, followed by a banning. That's why liberals were willing to keep posting on such sites even though they consistently lost all arguments. The bad people who bested them were sure to be sent packing by the LKK.

My idea is not for moderators to start banning non-libs who best libs in debates. Far from it. But . . . we could get delete this thread and then start several threads where we complain that the mods are all libs, they banned a perfectly decent non-lib, etc. Libs who visit for the first time no doubt look for such complaints to see if they will be happy on a forum.

As long as nobody spilled the beans, libs would keep coming. Imagine their tears when their real complaints to moderators for once do not result in banning.

As long as you stay dumb, the mods will love you.

 

[flan327]

That's a classical liberal, now known as "libertarians," since the socialists culturally expropriated the term "liberal."

Yes, we need more of them here also.

Oh grow up

 

[flan327]

What we really "need" is a CLOSED sign hammered onto the front door of the romper room so no others come to join in there and make us all gag.

You make me gag

I thought adults could discuss matters like ADULTS here

 

[flan327]

The last true Liberals either died in the late 70s or morphed into Globalist Race baiters.

Nope

Sorry to disappoint you
BUT I AM STILL ALIVE

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Nope

Sorry to disappoint you
BUT I AM STILL ALIVE

You are confusing angry, bitter and lonely with liberal.

 

[miketx]

I'm a former member of several heavily liberal-dominated sites.

Former because the liberals were typical in that they could not stand to have their absurdities pointed out to them with any humor whatsoever. They constantly whined about it. So, the "moderators," or the Liberal Klux Klan, as I call them, would subject me to a high-tech lynching in the form of repeated warnings for no violations, followed by a banning. That's why liberals were willing to keep posting on such sites even though they consistently lost all arguments. The bad people who bested them were sure to be sent packing by the LKK.

My idea is not for moderators to start banning non-libs who best libs in debates. Far from it. But . . . we could get delete this thread and then start several threads where we complain that the mods are all libs, they banned a perfectly decent non-lib, etc. Libs who visit for the first time no doubt look for such complaints to see if they will be happy on a forum.

As long as nobody spilled the beans, libs would keep coming. Imagine their tears when their real complaints to moderators for once do not result in banning.

Well they like things that smell awful and they like to see people hurt and things burning and people murdered and criminals roaming freely. Perhaps more of that...

 

[miketx]

Nope

Sorry to disappoint you
BUT I AM STILL ALIVE

Shame.

 

[Friends]

I'm a former member of several heavily liberal-dominated sites.

Former because the liberals were typical in that they could not stand to have their absurdities pointed out to them with any humor whatsoever. They constantly whined about it. So, the "moderators," or the Liberal Klux Klan, as I call them, would subject me to a high-tech lynching in the form of repeated warnings for no violations, followed by a banning. That's why liberals were willing to keep posting on such sites even though they consistently lost all arguments. The bad people who bested them were sure to be sent packing by the LKK.

My idea is not for moderators to start banning non-libs who best libs in debates. Far from it. But . . . we could get delete this thread and then start several threads where we complain that the mods are all libs, they banned a perfectly decent non-lib, etc. Libs who visit for the first time no doubt look for such complaints to see if they will be happy on a forum.

As long as nobody spilled the beans, libs would keep coming. Imagine their tears when their real complaints to moderators for once do not result in banning.

From the McCarthy Era to the Tet Offensive of the spring of 1968 it was dangerous in the United States to advocate socialism, criticize capitalism, or to say anything good about any Communist country. The Tet Offensive made the War in Vietnam unpopular, and made it safe to criticize the beliefs that led to that war. Since then it has been dangerous to draw connections between genes, intelligence, crime, and race.

Conservative used to be the offenders against intellectual freedom. Now liberals are.

 

[Riff Raff]

... it has been dangerous to draw connections between genes, intelligence, crime, and race.

[Liberals are] the offenders against intellectual freedom.

The Left has become oppressively anti-free speech and against the First Amendment. They increasingly act as mobs denouncing and demanding censorship, ostracization and career-ending punishment for opinions not in lockstep with their ideology.

 

[Friends]

The Left has become oppressively anti-free speech and against the First Amendment. They increasingly act as mobs denouncing and demanding censorship, ostracization and career-ending punishment for opinions not in lockstep with their ideology.

At the beginning of the civil rights movement it was plausible to believe that blacks and whites were intrinsically equal, and that evidence to the contrary will disappear as soon as blacks are given equal rights. They were given equal rights two generations ago. Now that it is obvious that the Negro race, considered collectively, is intrinsically inferior to the white race in characteristics necessary to create successful societies and civilizations, the left tries to suppress the evidence, and to punish those who draw attention to it.

If the left genuinely believed that the races are intrinsically equal, the left would welcome an honest, public debate on the subject. This is obviously not true. Charles Murray, and others of like mind are usually prevented from speaking on campuses.

In the September 1971 issue of Atlantic Richard Herrnstein had an article, entitled "IQ." In this he introduced concepts he was later to combine with Charles Murray in their book The Bell Curve.

In response of the new left organization Students for a Democratic Society held a convention at Harvard the following spring with the expressed purpose of getting Professors Richard Herrnstein, Arthur Jensen, and others like them fired. There was no effort to rationally dispute their assertions.

 

[mamooth]

And so the racist shitstains arrive. They always do whenever conservatives think they've found a SafeSpace.

Now the racists will start whimpering about being called racists. That also always happens. Conservatism is now mainly a competition to see who can be the biggest whiny eternal-victim.

Conservatives, proceed with submitting your best entries into that competition. I'll be the judge.