Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would say that school shootings by students themselves are the result of poor or non-existant parenting by stewing rabbits that shouldn't procreate in the first place.
.....out of the mouths of right-wing Trailer Trash.
Gun, ammunition sales remain robust across the U.S. | Outposts | Los Angeles Times
Its supply and demand.
Gun people are buying up ammo and guns since Obama was elected.
Cops have already been killed over the lie that Obama will take guns away.
There have been 340 school shootings since 1992. How did any of those shootings relate to an "unjust government"?
source:
SchoolShooting.org
Gun, ammunition sales remain robust across the U.S. | Outposts | Los Angeles Times
Its supply and demand.
Gun people are buying up ammo and guns since Obama was elected.
Cops have already been killed over the lie that Obama will take guns away.
No President will ever have the power to take guns away from the American Public.!!
Charging $2 for every bullet will not prevent any crime at all. Do you think having a $2 fine in addition to the regular sentence would help deter murder? The cost of ammo has increased a great deal over the last 2 years, gun crimes have not decreased.
Charging $2 for every bullet will not prevent any crime at all. Do you think having a $2 fine in addition to the regular sentence would help deter murder? The cost of ammo has increased a great deal over the last 2 years, gun crimes have not decreased.
You are absolutely right, Screaming Eagle.
To reduce gun violence, one must reduce gun ownership.
There is no other alternative.
At least not one for people who care about civil rights.
My solution is to allow hunters and legitimate gun owners to own, buy and keep the guns they need to pursue their work or hobbies as they see fit.
If you want to hunt, by all means hunt. If you're a farmer, by all means keep a gun around if you need one on the farm.
But one needs a 9mm weapon or an automatic weapon for hunting. Guns that are used only for killing American people have no place in American homes.
Charging $2 for every bullet will not prevent any crime at all. Do you think having a $2 fine in addition to the regular sentence would help deter murder? The cost of ammo has increased a great deal over the last 2 years, gun crimes have not decreased.
You are absolutely right, Screaming Eagle.
To reduce gun violence, one must reduce gun ownership.
There is no other alternative.
At least not one for people who care about civil rights.
My solution is to allow hunters and legitimate gun owners to own, buy and keep the guns they need to pursue their work or hobbies as they see fit.
If you want to hunt, by all means hunt. If you're a farmer, by all means keep a gun around if you need one on the farm.
But one needs a 9mm weapon or an automatic weapon for hunting. Guns that are used only for killing American people have no place in American homes.
Rabbi -
Your guns have only one real, provable, calculable outcome - they increase the likelihood that a member of your family will die of gunshot wound.
Fact.
You have no numbers. You only have opinions. Wrong opinions, as it turns out. Your studies have been shown to use faulty methodology. THey are thoroughly debunked. Your credibility is taking a hit by continuing to insist they are authoritative. They are not. Nor could you explain how having a gun makes one more likely to die from a homicide in a way that passes the laugh test.Rabbi -
You have opinions.
I have numbers.
# Higher household gun ownership correlates with higher rates of homicides, suicides, and unintentional shootings (Harvard Injury Control Center).
#Gun death rates are 7 times higher in the states with the highest compared with the lowest household gun ownership. (Harvard Injury Control Research Center, 2009).
Or let me guess - joethegunman.com has "rebutted" Harvard as well!![]()
At this stage I have not seen anything presented which would lead me to believe the Harvard Injury Control Centre - or the other dozen studies which came to similar conclusions - have got it wrong in any way at all.
By all means present an authorative, peer-reviewed case - your opinions I am less interested in.