I Hate to Say It, But the January 6 Committee Has Proved that Trump Committed a Serious Crime on January 6, 2021

[scruffy]

how do we know?

because your media source lied and you bought it, hook, line, and sinker.

Chuck Schumer, who your right wing FAKE news source claims was Majority leader who turned down help, when it was Mitch McConnell who was Majority leader of the Senate until Jan 20th.

And here you are, regurgitating your right wing FAKE news....without thought or reason.....you simply just beleeve..... the lies.

Lefties are not very bright. ^^^

What difference does it make if it was Schumer or McConnell?

Hm?

Dumbass leftie?

 

[justoffal]

Trump had the same info.
Yet, it was he....not Pelosi, not the Sergeants at Arms, not McConnell....who stood on the stage and incited and angered his mob......then told 'em to charge at the legislators counting the EC ballots.

Didja watch any of the hearing today?
It was riveting again.

You should watch it on YouTube tonight. It could make you a better American.

IMHO

GET IN THEIR FACES YOU MEAN?

Wow....I guess all of DC should be going behind bars pretty soon then.

Maxine Waters encourages supporters to harass Trump administration officials | CNN Politics

Rep. Maxine Waters called on her supporters to publicly confront and harass members of the Trump administration in response to the "zero tolerance" policy that led to the separation of families at the border.

www.cnn.com

 

[Billy_Bob]

One month ago, those who thought Trump was involved was 58%. Today that number has dropped to just 44%. The Jan 6 schitt show is not having the effect they want. They are showing that Pelosi was actually responsible due to her gross negligence. Yet the Schitt show persists...

It no wonder they are apoplectic.. All the show has done is expose Nancy's incompetence.. And the Schiff move to assist in breaching Capitol Hill Security will place an exclamation point on the double standard. And that one we can prove without a doubt.

 

[hadit]

The only way he wins is if he cheats.

Setting up the excuses early.

 

[Hellbilly]

Setting up the excuses early.

You do know that is a reference to what trump said, yes?

 

[hadit]

You do know that is a reference to what trump said, yes?

Are you saying that TRUMP! doesn't have to cheat to win? Because that would be amazing to hear.

 

[Hellbilly]

Are you saying that TRUMP! doesn't have to cheat to win? Because that would be amazing to hear.

I’m saying this so called fraud was predicted by trump himself.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Of course Trump was eviscerated. That's the way all Stalinesque show trials go.

 

[hadit]

View attachment 660385
I’m saying this so called fraud was predicted by trump himself.

You just can't say it, can you?

 

[Hellbilly]

You just can't say it, can you?

Say what?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.

At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.

Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.

From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:

FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.

Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.

The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)

The highlighted statement indicates a violation of the law. What law was violated?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

She conceded. She's become a non entidy. The only reason she stays alive is that you lunatics keep bringing here up. Well, I guess lunatics will lunatic.

What's an "entidy"?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Chuck Shumer and Nancy Pelosi never turned down requests for the NG for a watchful eye. You have to blame it on someone else besides Republicans.

Bullshit

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.

At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.

Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.

From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:

FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.

Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.

The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)

So nothing about trying to encourage a Vice President to overturn an election -- which he had no authority to do - based on election lies that TRUMP KNEW BEFOREHAND WAS BULLSHIT -- and mix that in with pressuring election officials to fudge the vote count in your favor -- none of that bothered you?


Who gives a damn he didn't call off the riot...he probably couldn't do that if he wanted to.....that is the least of what was wrong...

 

[hadit]

Say what?

That TRUMP! doesn't have to cheat to win.

 

[Hellbilly]

That TRUMP! doesn't have to cheat to win.

No one needs to cheat to win.
Look at Biden. He won without cheating.

 

[Faun]

In other words "You didnt cause this riot, but since you didnt tell them to stop, the riot is now YOUR fault, Trump". Ok, so how was Trump supposed to tell rioters to stop rioting? People who are busy chucking rocks at the police arent checking their twitter feed, so how the fuck was he supposed to tell them anything?

Of course Trump's violent mob of domestic terrorists were checking their phones...

 

[dblack]

No one needs to cheat to win.
Look at Biden. He won without cheating.

Does either side have the dignity to lose without "cheating"? ie, accept defeat graciously instead leaning on childish excuses?

 

[Faun]

That TRUMP! doesn't have to cheat to win.

LOL

And yet he tried to do exactly that by getting legit Biden electoral votes discarded.

 

[Hellbilly]

Does either side have the dignity to lose without "cheating"? ie, accept defeat graciously instead leaning on childish excuses?

I can only think of one person who refused to admit he lost.