Debate Now I find it amusing, why so much anger against the Wall?

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Democratic Party regards Anglo Voters as its opposition and they are using illegal aliens to cancel out their vote.
The Democrats have not won the majority of middle class voters in a presidential election since Carter.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Walled borders are the tools of authoritarian government.

All countries control their border crossings.
All countries control their immigration.
The Democrats are pandering to the racist Aztlan Nationalist who are bragging about taking over America.

 

[Humorme]

Walled borders are the tools of authoritarian government.

All countries control their border crossings.
All countries control their immigration.
The Democrats are pandering to the racist Aztlan Nationalist who are bragging about taking over America.

You missed the whole point. Most countries patrol their borders without walls. It's going to be embarrassing when one day the president of Mexico says to the president of the United Socialist States of Amerika, "Mr. President, tear down that wall!"

 

[Humorme]

People keep talking about the costs, meanwhile it's a drop in the bucket compared to the costs of paying for illegal immigration.

The real question is, really, why is there SO much rage and emotional triggering by the thought of a wall? To me it's as transparent as can be, some realize the ability to turn America socialist and another global shytehole is impacted greatly if they cannot send mass illegal immigration over the border.

I can imagine some heated arguments over abortion, religious freedom, even right to bear arms...but a wall? It's a structure designed to protect your border, what in the hell is wrong with this that so many lose it?

Because vwalls became obsolete witht he invention of the cannon. It will stop nothing and will cost billions of dollars. I am for legal imigration only. I would just rather spend money on things that actually work!

The wall is not to stop cannons but to stop Mexicans, unless you think they will be fired from a cannon over the wall.

Half a dozen Mexicans and a thirty foot wall. Three cordless drills and half an hour... Trump's Big Beautiful Door.

 

[shockedcanadian]

People keep talking about the costs, meanwhile it's a drop in the bucket compared to the costs of paying for illegal immigration.

The real question is, really, why is there SO much rage and emotional triggering by the thought of a wall? To me it's as transparent as can be, some realize the ability to turn America socialist and another global shytehole is impacted greatly if they cannot send mass illegal immigration over the border.

I can imagine some heated arguments over abortion, religious freedom, even right to bear arms...but a wall? It's a structure designed to protect your border, what in the hell is wrong with this that so many lose it?

Because vwalls became obsolete witht he invention of the cannon. It will stop nothing and will cost billions of dollars. I am for legal imigration only. I would just rather spend money on things that actually work!

The wall is not to stop cannons but to stop Mexicans, unless you think they will be fired from a cannon over the wall.

Half a dozen Mexicans and a thirty foot wall. Three cordless drills and half an hour... Trump's Big Beautiful Door.

By the time they were through it the border guards would be waiting. Furthermore, what if the drill didn't work? Thats a hell of a long walk to find out your not equipped to breach the wall. Even if they do, it ill be a quick ride back home.

 

[evenflow1969]

People keep talking about the costs, meanwhile it's a drop in the bucket compared to the costs of paying for illegal immigration.

The real question is, really, why is there SO much rage and emotional triggering by the thought of a wall? To me it's as transparent as can be, some realize the ability to turn America socialist and another global shytehole is impacted greatly if they cannot send mass illegal immigration over the border.

I can imagine some heated arguments over abortion, religious freedom, even right to bear arms...but a wall? It's a structure designed to protect your border, what in the hell is wrong with this that so many lose it?

Because vwalls became obsolete witht he invention of the cannon. It will stop nothing and will cost billions of dollars. I am for legal imigration only. I would just rather spend money on things that actually work!

The wall is not to stop cannons but to stop Mexicans, unless you think they will be fired from a cannon over the wall.

Half a dozen Mexicans and a thirty foot wall. Three cordless drills and half an hour... Trump's Big Beautiful Door.

By the time they were through it the border guards would be waiting. Furthermore, what if the drill didn't work? Thats a hell of a long walk to find out your not equipped to breach the wall. Even if they do, it ill be a quick ride back home.

Thousand miles of border , the patrol can't be every where!

 

[Humorme]

People keep talking about the costs, meanwhile it's a drop in the bucket compared to the costs of paying for illegal immigration.

The real question is, really, why is there SO much rage and emotional triggering by the thought of a wall? To me it's as transparent as can be, some realize the ability to turn America socialist and another global shytehole is impacted greatly if they cannot send mass illegal immigration over the border.

I can imagine some heated arguments over abortion, religious freedom, even right to bear arms...but a wall? It's a structure designed to protect your border, what in the hell is wrong with this that so many lose it?

Because vwalls became obsolete witht he invention of the cannon. It will stop nothing and will cost billions of dollars. I am for legal imigration only. I would just rather spend money on things that actually work!

The wall is not to stop cannons but to stop Mexicans, unless you think they will be fired from a cannon over the wall.

Half a dozen Mexicans and a thirty foot wall. Three cordless drills and half an hour... Trump's Big Beautiful Door.

By the time they were through it the border guards would be waiting. Furthermore, what if the drill didn't work? Thats a hell of a long walk to find out your not equipped to breach the wall. Even if they do, it ill be a quick ride back home.

If they can't see them now, they sure as well won't see them when they bore holes. Guards? Nothing a handful of $50s won't fix.

 

[watchingfromafar]

The wall argument is crapola and those who advocate it use the same toilet paper over and over & never flush in-between

In my view only

No animosity intended or implied

Just speaking from a roto-ruter employee’s point of view

 

[watchingfromafar]

Texas has 367 miles of coast line that is unprotected from would-be immigrants coming in on rafts or boats. We need walls along this line toooo!!!

lol

 

[jillian]

People keep talking about the costs, meanwhile it's a drop in the bucket compared to the costs of paying for illegal immigration.

The real question is, really, why is there SO much rage and emotional triggering by the thought of a wall? To me it's as transparent as can be, some realize the ability to turn America socialist and another global shytehole is impacted greatly if they cannot send mass illegal immigration over the border.

I can imagine some heated arguments over abortion, religious freedom, even right to bear arms...but a wall? It's a structure designed to protect your border, what in the hell is wrong with this that so many lose it?

you find it amusing?

no one cares.

 

[Unkotare]

Walled borders are the tools of authoritarian government.

All countries control their border crossings.
All countries control their immigration.
The Democrats are pandering to the racist Aztlan Nationalist who are bragging about taking over America.

You missed the whole point. Most countries patrol their borders without walls. It's going to be embarrassing when one day the president of Mexico says to the president of the United Socialist States of Amerika, "Mr. President, tear down that wall!"

The proper response to which would be "you first."

 

[watchingfromafar]

the wall separates you from me
while i am a parry of yoyu\

\

 

[watchingfromafar]

Fact chech-------

You are thre wall -

 

[watchingfromafar]

Statue Of Liberty
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”​

 

[ABikerSailor]

Statue Of Liberty
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”​

Guess we're gonna have to take that inscription off of the Statue of Liberty.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

People keep talking about the costs; meanwhile. it's a drop in the bucket compared to the costs of paying for illegal immigration.

The real question is, really, why is there SO much rage and emotional triggering by the thought of a wall? To me it's as transparent as can be, s

I can imagine some heated arguments over abortion, religious freedom, even right to bear arms...but a wall? It's a structure designed to protect your border, what in the hell is wrong with this that so many lose it?

Squeezing Both Ends Against the Middle

From the Left, snobbish hatred of all unentitled White people. From the Right, cheap and passive labor.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I gave you one response to this. Shall we try another?

LEGAL dictionaries define "immigration" as:

"The coming Into a country of foreigners for purposes of permanent residence."

What is IMMIGRATION? definition of IMMIGRATION (Black's Law Dictionary)

Those advocates of the wall cannot delineate or differentiate between citizens and Guest Workers. And so they beat this subject to death regarding why people don't come here "legally." It is a bogus argument. The immigration statute that governs this argument is plainly about improper entry. In the first place, not everyone who comes here wants to become a permanent resident.

Add to that, the United States Constitution provides for the "equal protection of the laws." Therefore, laws that allow SOME employers to hire foreign labor while denying to other employers the same luxury is blatantly unconstitutional since it denies to employers the equal protection of the laws as per the 14th Amendment.

After all, the employer creates the job. It is his / her job to give to whomever they want. Those who accuse foreigners of "stealing jobs" are making a purely SOCIALIST argument. Period. Nobody can steal a job the citizens didn't own in the first place.

Statutes that deny foreigners access to come into the United States to do business with private companies are antithetical to the objective of a nation conceived in Liberty; they deny employers their Rights under the 14th Amendment; they fail to pass constitutional muster.

Building a wall to perpetuate that evil is trashing your own Constitution.

Or you have people like this clown that can't differentiate between legal and illegal immigration. SMFH

Someone clearly doesn't understand what Equal Protection is. The 14th EPC is directed at the state. LMFAO

Changing the Language Is the Rulers' First Step Towards Changing Minds

Calling these illegal aliens "immigrants" is like calling shoplifters "shoppers."

 

[Humorme]

I gave you one response to this. Shall we try another?

LEGAL dictionaries define "immigration" as:

"The coming Into a country of foreigners for purposes of permanent residence."

What is IMMIGRATION? definition of IMMIGRATION (Black's Law Dictionary)

Those advocates of the wall cannot delineate or differentiate between citizens and Guest Workers. And so they beat this subject to death regarding why people don't come here "legally." It is a bogus argument. The immigration statute that governs this argument is plainly about improper entry. In the first place, not everyone who comes here wants to become a permanent resident.

Add to that, the United States Constitution provides for the "equal protection of the laws." Therefore, laws that allow SOME employers to hire foreign labor while denying to other employers the same luxury is blatantly unconstitutional since it denies to employers the equal protection of the laws as per the 14th Amendment.

After all, the employer creates the job. It is his / her job to give to whomever they want. Those who accuse foreigners of "stealing jobs" are making a purely SOCIALIST argument. Period. Nobody can steal a job the citizens didn't own in the first place.

Statutes that deny foreigners access to come into the United States to do business with private companies are antithetical to the objective of a nation conceived in Liberty; they deny employers their Rights under the 14th Amendment; they fail to pass constitutional muster.

Building a wall to perpetuate that evil is trashing your own Constitution.

Or you have people like this clown that can't differentiate between legal and illegal immigration. SMFH

Someone clearly doesn't understand what Equal Protection is. The 14th EPC is directed at the state. LMFAO

Changing the Language Is the Rulers' First Step Towards Changing Minds

Calling these illegal aliens "immigrants" is like calling shoplifters "shoppers."

"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself" Thomas Paine

How do yo feel about those gutless pieces of dog squeeze that hate, loathe and despise the concept of a presumption of innocence / innocent until proven guilty in light of Paine's warning?

 

[Liquid Reigns]

I gave you one response to this. Shall we try another?

LEGAL dictionaries define "immigration" as:

"The coming Into a country of foreigners for purposes of permanent residence."

What is IMMIGRATION? definition of IMMIGRATION (Black's Law Dictionary)

Those advocates of the wall cannot delineate or differentiate between citizens and Guest Workers. And so they beat this subject to death regarding why people don't come here "legally." It is a bogus argument. The immigration statute that governs this argument is plainly about improper entry. In the first place, not everyone who comes here wants to become a permanent resident.

Add to that, the United States Constitution provides for the "equal protection of the laws." Therefore, laws that allow SOME employers to hire foreign labor while denying to other employers the same luxury is blatantly unconstitutional since it denies to employers the equal protection of the laws as per the 14th Amendment.

After all, the employer creates the job. It is his / her job to give to whomever they want. Those who accuse foreigners of "stealing jobs" are making a purely SOCIALIST argument. Period. Nobody can steal a job the citizens didn't own in the first place.

Statutes that deny foreigners access to come into the United States to do business with private companies are antithetical to the objective of a nation conceived in Liberty; they deny employers their Rights under the 14th Amendment; they fail to pass constitutional muster.

Building a wall to perpetuate that evil is trashing your own Constitution.

Or you have people like this clown that can't differentiate between legal and illegal immigration. SMFH

Someone clearly doesn't understand what Equal Protection is. The 14th EPC is directed at the state. LMFAO

Changing the Language Is the Rulers' First Step Towards Changing Minds

Calling these illegal aliens "immigrants" is like calling shoplifters "shoppers."

"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself" Thomas Paine

How do yo feel about those gutless pieces of dog squeeze that hate, loathe and despise the concept of a presumption of innocence / innocent until proven guilty in light of Paine's warning?

If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. imjusayn