I Don't Understand Why Democrats Keep Calling For Free Speech

I am so out of the loop. Who's Tiller?
 
Yet you have not a care in world for the Black college kids at the Black college where Kirk acolytes showed up uninvited and tried to continue his work?
There is no specific information indicating that Charlie Kirk attended historically Black colleges or universities (HBCUs). However, he co-founded Turning Point USA, which aimed to engage young conservatives, including those from diverse backgrounds, on college campuses
 
I don't understand what the problem is because anybody who is this dangerous should be prosecuted no matter what their political party is.



That's exactly what's happening here!!
I have an idea. Why don't you call up your local police department and tell them you want to report a crime. And when they ask you what you want to report, show them or tell them about the news article and let them know that there are people whose free speech you want curtailed and others you want executed.

Let us know what they say.
 
After a national TV host repeatedly called him a "KILLER".

Calling someone a "KILLER" is far more incite-full than calling him a "NAZI".
A national TV host who the 'killer' testified he had never watched/listened to. A national TV host that you won't provide any context for his remarks on that. Again in my post #185:


USMB edited out the last part of that post but it can be seen in its entirety at Post #185.
 
Last edited:
Yes but I still think that there should be exceptions. After all it's legal to shoot somebody if you feel like they're a threat to you physically and it falls underneath the second amendment and it's considered self-defense, but we can't just shoot somebody we don't like. That's murder.
Unfortunately :)
 
15th post
I have an idea. Why don't you call up your local police department and tell them you want to report a crime. And when they ask you what you want to report, show them or tell them about the news article and let them know that there are people whose free speech you want curtailed and others you want executed.

Let us know what they say.
Your idea, Give it your best shot.
 
So are you saying that he deserved to die?




Now THIS is the response that I was expecting to get.




Yeah but like drudge said, these are obviously terrorists.




Yeah but don't you think that it's time for more exceptions to this rule as well when it starts becoming this dangerous?
And this is an example of what I was attempting to explain to you about making a civil claim for defamation per se.

Falsely accusing someone of a criminal act or being a criminal is considered defamation per se so you don't have to prove how their false statement harmed you since the damages are presumed.

Falsely calling someone a terrorist just because it makes you feel good is accusing them of criminal behavior or being a criminal.
 
I was once told this by law enforcement.

If someone calls you and threatens to punch you, that is not an actionable threat as they can not punch you over the phone.

If someone continues to do so, that is harassment and actionable.

If you are their front porch and threaten them, that is an actionable threat.
In lethal self defense they refer to that as ability, opportunity and jeopardy. All three elements must be present to use deadly force.
 
Back
Top Bottom