Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 18,150
- 19,951
- 2,288
Nope. Thanks for asking.But you are ok with the right legislating from the bench?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. Thanks for asking.But you are ok with the right legislating from the bench?
Can't wait until the shit stains start trying to burn things down here.The truth is, this is a crippling blow to the liberal long-term agenda. We all knew it was coming, and it could've been avoided if Ginsberg's ego hadn't kept her clinging to power long past her expiration date.
I never imagined Trump could possibly appoint three justices.
A fatal blow to the left
Unfortunately the loss will likely be irreversibleIf the short term loss of the Senate is the price of a lifetime appointee to the SCOTUS that keeps the left from legislating from the bench, I'll take that trade.
Other than quisling turncoat john roberts voting with the liberals on obamacare that has not happenedBut you are ok with the right legislating from the bench?
You mean like filthy vermin commiecrat scum doing right now? Stop lying.If the short term loss of the Senate is the price of a lifetime appointee to the SCOTUS that keeps the left from legislating from the bench, I'll take that trade.He does not need 10
I was totally mistaken about that
but we are sure to lose of of the republican senators
As it stands, we do not know where the senate will be next year, so I'll fight one battle at a time. Take this SCOTUS victory and deal with the senate later.
But you are ok with the right legislating from the bench?
The left scum are legislating from the bench all over the country.If the short term loss of the Senate is the price of a lifetime appointee to the SCOTUS that keeps the left from legislating from the bench, I'll take that trade.He does not need 10
I was totally mistaken about that
but we are sure to lose of of the republican senators
As it stands, we do not know where the senate will be next year, so I'll fight one battle at a time. Take this SCOTUS victory and deal with the senate later.
I've heard that many times before and it never comes to fruition. Even California may have a change of heart when the left totally fucks it up.Unfortunately the loss will likely be irreversible
I contend that the new SCOTUS will strike down the legality of such a blatant scheme to grab power.and if the dems hold the house, senate and presidency they can expand the SC to whatever number they want and pack it with liberals
Intelligent people realized the true victory of 2016 was the court appointees.The main reason I voted Trump was SCOTUS... it's paid off in spades
It is likely that Trump will nominate a young, ultra conservative female.I doubt another Kavanaugh situationMitch does not have any brownie points with any of the three.There has never been a vacancy to the court for which the sitting president did not appoint a replacement
Obama does not count?
Obama did appoint someone, or nominated i guess is the proper term. Merrick Garland.
Trump can nominate all he wants
It is the confirmation that will be contentious
Yep. Pubs control the Senate, however. It will be contentious for sure, but there will be a vote and the nominee will be seated. Little doubt about it, really.
Not so easy
I see Murkowski,Collins and Romney blocking a vote
That makes it 50-50
We'll see.
IMO, they'll posture, horsetrade, then come up up with a justification, preen for the cameras and vote. Even if they cant convince one of the 3 to do so, which is unlikely, IMO, there is a tiebreaker vote. That's the VP, Pence.
Bread and circuses about to commence. The outcome is I'd say 90% certain.
Corey Gardner is another candidate trying to distance himself from Trump
If he wins, Kelly can take office in November in Arizona
Either way, there are going to be some outraged politicians
It's not Mitch's brownie points or lack thereof, it's how they think their actions will impact them. These are politicians we're talking about.
There are always outraged politicians. Can't even take their outrage seriously, as it's staged nonsense 99.9% of the time.
Gonna be interesting, that's for sure. What tidbits will the Dems dig up on the nominee. Will Gloria Allred bring in some victims. Will they be members of the Pedo Island Platinum elite club. What does George Soros think. Did they wear panties on their heads at a frat party 20 years ago or play grab ass with a cheerleader in High School. Are they anti-women, even if women, anti-gay, anti this or that. lol. They playwrites are tuning up that much is for sure. Politics today are a damn joke....
But every statement, every decision, every action will be reviewed with a fine tooth comb.
Make it harder to justify confirmation in six weeks
I fully expect it. The prevalence of smear campaigns in politics is greater than ever. This is a very high stakes prize. They'll be insulting this person's dog and unborn grandchildren before it's over. They'll be nazis, they'll be anti women, they'll be straight from the bowels of hell sent by Satan himself.
They'll throw endless shit at the wall and anything that seems to gain traction, they'll focus on with rabid attacks in the press and anywhere else they can think of. I wouldn't be surprised to see TV commercials on this issue, smearing whoever this ends up being with whatever political poop they can think of.
They will also pack the lower courts.....Democrats will have the congress and white house at some point. Then they will expand the court and quickly appoint 2-4 judges. If not more. I hope they pack it with 6 or 8 more. The only way we get real changes to our system is when the white wing complains. So give them something to complain about.
Intelligent people realized the true victory of 2016 was the court appointees.The main reason I voted Trump was SCOTUS... it's paid off in spades
They will also pack the lower courts.....
You: We (sob) will win someday (sob).The true victory will come to those who pack the court
They will also pack the lower courts.....You: We (sob) will win someday (sob).The true victory will come to those who pack the court
Me:
View attachment 390622
Too little, too late. The courts are changed for the better for generations to come. Your vote won't change that fact.We are already dealing with it
Voting has started
It is likely that Trump will nominate a young, ultra conservative female.I doubt another Kavanaugh situationMitch does not have any brownie points with any of the three.There has never been a vacancy to the court for which the sitting president did not appoint a replacement
Obama does not count?
Obama did appoint someone, or nominated i guess is the proper term. Merrick Garland.
Trump can nominate all he wants
It is the confirmation that will be contentious
Yep. Pubs control the Senate, however. It will be contentious for sure, but there will be a vote and the nominee will be seated. Little doubt about it, really.
Not so easy
I see Murkowski,Collins and Romney blocking a vote
That makes it 50-50
We'll see.
IMO, they'll posture, horsetrade, then come up up with a justification, preen for the cameras and vote. Even if they cant convince one of the 3 to do so, which is unlikely, IMO, there is a tiebreaker vote. That's the VP, Pence.
Bread and circuses about to commence. The outcome is I'd say 90% certain.
Corey Gardner is another candidate trying to distance himself from Trump
If he wins, Kelly can take office in November in Arizona
Either way, there are going to be some outraged politicians
It's not Mitch's brownie points or lack thereof, it's how they think their actions will impact them. These are politicians we're talking about.
There are always outraged politicians. Can't even take their outrage seriously, as it's staged nonsense 99.9% of the time.
Gonna be interesting, that's for sure. What tidbits will the Dems dig up on the nominee. Will Gloria Allred bring in some victims. Will they be members of the Pedo Island Platinum elite club. What does George Soros think. Did they wear panties on their heads at a frat party 20 years ago or play grab ass with a cheerleader in High School. Are they anti-women, even if women, anti-gay, anti this or that. lol. They playwrites are tuning up that much is for sure. Politics today are a damn joke....
But every statement, every decision, every action will be reviewed with a fine tooth comb.
Make it harder to justify confirmation in six weeks
I fully expect it. The prevalence of smear campaigns in politics is greater than ever. This is a very high stakes prize. They'll be insulting this person's dog and unborn grandchildren before it's over. They'll be nazis, they'll be anti women, they'll be straight from the bowels of hell sent by Satan himself.
They'll throw endless shit at the wall and anything that seems to gain traction, they'll focus on with rabid attacks in the press and anywhere else they can think of. I wouldn't be surprised to see TV commercials on this issue, smearing whoever this ends up being with whatever political poop they can think of.
Her opinions and past statements will be picked apart with a fine tooth comb
Because they are hilariously incompetent and notorious for their lack of vetting. What a stupid question.What makes you think the Trump administration hasn't been doing all along?
That has already happened. Check the polling on taking money out of elections. Check the polling on abortion choice. Check the polling on term limits. What needs to happen is for people to actually get out and vote.Change has to occur among the people in order for change to occur in the political system.
/—-/ And what proof do you have other than your deranged TDS?Because they are hilariously incompetent and notorious for their lack of vetting. What a stupid question.What makes you think the Trump administration hasn't been doing all along?
Man I certainly hope so. 8 will do. 17 on the court.and if the dems hold the house, senate and presidency they can expand the SC to whatever number they want and pack it with liberals
You need proof that the Trump administration is notoriously bad at vetting? Welcome back from your 4 year coma. I am not an RN, so i can't help you.And what proof do you have other than your deranged TDS?