Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 93,598
- 47,068
- 2,615
Odd then that this one clerked for Scalia and was appointed by BushNope. It’s because the community organizer appointed thousands of ultra left wing judges to manipulate the system.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Odd then that this one clerked for Scalia and was appointed by BushNope. It’s because the community organizer appointed thousands of ultra left wing judges to manipulate the system.
Yup, demofascists desperately trying to hide their massive fraud.Judge Finds Justice Dept. Overreach in Subpoenas to Minnesota Officials
A federal judge in Minnesota quashed the Justice Department’s subpoenas of state and local officials in a ruling unsealed on Monday, finding that the Trump administration had engaged in a politically motivated and improper use of the grand jury process. Those subpoenas were issued at the height of the administration’s winter immigration crackdown in the state.
Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz wrote in a highly critical opinion that “the dominant purpose of the challenged subpoenas is to coerce Minnesota officials into assisting the federal government with enforcing civil immigration law and to harass and retaliate against them for failing to do so.”
Judge Schiltz, who was nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush (and who clerked for Scalia), had previously raised concerns with the conduct of the Trump administration during Operation Metro Surge. That crackdown, which involved thousands of agents, led to thousands of arrests in Minnesota and three shootings in Minneapolis.
![]()
Judge Finds Justice Dept. Overreach in Subpoenas to Minnesota Officials
The judge quashed the subpoenas, writing that they were designed to “harass and retaliate against” Democratic officials who bucked the Trump administration on immigration enforcement.www.nytimes.com
Here's how threads like this usually go. A post is written illustrating one of the ways the trump regime has abused its authority by trying to prosecute a political enemy. trump fans reflexively respond by claiming Don was the victim of similar injustice by D's or by Biden's DoJ. Or there's some kind boilerplate rebuttal from the regime like this...........The Justice Department said in a statement on Monday that it “takes the unlawful obstruction of federal law enforcement operations extremely seriously and will continue to act in full compliance with the law to investigate these matters.”
It didn't comply with the law, which is the point.
From there the discussion devolves in to a fruitless exchange with those loyal to trump repeating his specious assertions of victimhood.
Let's not do that. Let's take this matter for what it is regardless of what you believe was done to trump. So what is it?
Judge Schiltz wrote on Monday that the justification given for the subpoenas was an investigation into possible violations of federal laws that make it illegal to conceal an undocumented immigration or obstruct the government. But in fact, the judge wrote, the “subpoenas are directed to investigating activity that is not only legal, but constitutionally protected from interference by the very federal government that issued the subpoenas.”
Maybe this once it would be permissible for trump fans to allow themselves a rare acknowledgement of wrongdoing. You wouldn't have to admit trump lost the 2020 election or that he refused to comply with a subpoena for the return of classified docs. Just that this wasn't the right thing to do.
Judge Shultz................"Initiating a criminal investigation in order to harrass political opponents or to coerce them in to taking official action, particularly official action that the federal government can not directly require those political opponents to take, is a blatantly unlawful and unethical use of the grand jury process. The only question, then, is whether the challenged subpoenas were issued for one of these forbidden purposes. The Court has no doubt they were."
Neither is Trump – and Trump’s meritless prosecutions of perceived political enemies who’ve done nothing wrong are illegal.Of course this will be overturned.
Tim Walz is not above the law.
Odd then that this one clerked for Scalia and was appointed by Bush
More lies from the dishonest right.Yup, demofascists desperately trying to hide their massive fraud.
You're a dumbass easily brainwashed idiot.Neither is Trump – and Trump’s meritless prosecutions of perceived political enemies who’ve done nothing wrong are illegal.
Poor baby got triggeredYou're a dumbass easily brainwashed idiot.
Eat a bag of dicks.
Nope, those are facts. But you lying leftoids are desperate to bury them.More lies from the dishonest right.
Yes you are.Poor baby got triggered
McConnell blocked his Judicial appointmentsNope. It’s because the community organizer appointed thousands of ultra left wing judges to manipulate the system.
Mr. Blanche has misled Congress while testifying under oath.Yes you are.
/——/ Bush is no conservative and clerking for a SC Justice doesn’t define ones politics decades later.The judge was appointed by Bush and clerked for Scalia
Of course he’s a crooked lib (snark)
“No one should be targeted for questioning those in power,” Mr. Frey said in a statement. “No community should be expected to accept harmful policies without objection. And no administration should use the tools of law enforcement to silence dissent.”You should study the appointment process.
There's not a shred of evidence that this is a politically motivated prosecution.I heard a commentator speaking about the story say Todd Blanche, during his testimony regarding the nomination to be AG, told Congress he absolutely would not allow these kinds of politically motivated prosecutions.
That is an abject denial of the facts.There's not a shred of evidence that this is a politically motivated prosecution.
That's a stupid lie.That is an abject denial of the facts.
Cool story. Study the appointment process.“No one should be targeted for questioning those in power,” Mr. Frey said in a statement. “No community should be expected to accept harmful policies without objection. And no administration should use the tools of law enforcement to silence dissent.”