...investigation and impeachment proceedings are valid?
What evidence would need to exist short of Trump magically admitting wrong doing in full detail?
It seems as though you dismiss the investigation into Trump for two reasons and two reasons only and nothing will change your mind about it. Those reasons are:
1) Trump is a republican and you voted for him.
2) The democrats are behind the impeachment.
Is that it? What I find incredibly lame is that you don’t even think the investigation itself is necessary. You think the democrats or any investigative body should drop the whole thing. Based on all of the facts presented, you can’t even say “well, okay. Let’s look at a few things. There are a few red flags about this whole thing if I’m trying to be objective about it. Just let an independent body investigate it instead of those demo-rats!”
They would accept something like this:
"I, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America - the bestest, greatestest President the U.S. ever had, unsurpassed in health, upper-body strength and stamina - hereby order Mr. Giuliani, Ambassador Sondland, Secretary Pompeo, and various other government officials...
- corruptly to extract from Ukraine, from President Zelenskyy personally, a thing of value, namely support for my re-election, in the form of a statement that Joe Biden is a suspected criminal, namely by loudly and publicly announcing an investigation into Joe Biden's corruption (for which exists no evidence whatsoever).
In furtherance of that goal I corruptly, in defiance of applicable law, I order Mr. Mulvaney to withhold crucial security aid that was appropriated for the express purpose of aiding the security of Ukraine, push back against Russia, and thus aid the security of the U.S. of A., without providing the legally required notification to Congress. Since this is in violation of the law, I also require Mr. Mulvaney to manufacture an ex-post "justification" for the hold, and then another, and then another, as each of them fails to catch.
In so doing, I am abusing my office, and the awesome powers that come with it. I am also inviting a bribe, in the form of campaign assistance, in order for me to perform an official act I was obligated to perform. In so doing, I also corruptly invite a foreign power to interfere into a U.S. election in violation of applicable law. In so doing I also, corruptly, undermine and subvert established processes to implement U.S. foreign policy, and, in conjunction with that, the security of the U.S. of A. and for nothing more than for personal, political and electoral gain.
Signed, Donald J. Trump - the bestest, greatestest ... etc. etc. etc."
For that statement to be acceptable, it has to be verified, vouched-for, and published by Fox News, Breibart, GatewayPundit, The New York Post, and every other outlet of the rightarded blabbosphere.
________________________________________________________
Of course, the above (minus the publication in the rightarded blabbosphere) is exactly what the available record demonstrates. And, of course, we already know that they have chosen to reject every bit of the available evidence for Trump's corruption, from the Mueller report to the serial violations of the Emoluments Clause and on to the extortion of Ukraine.
What part of "evidence (against a GOP president) is not accepted" do you fail to understand?
