Hydroxychloroquine

#81: We've cited scientific medical evidence opposing your claim. Where is a study on ocular coronaviruses? What about the potential intermediate COVID-19 host infected with similar parasites that hydroxychloroquine was developed to treat? How long will USMB prisoners pretend not to notice the COVID-19 report from Los Alamos, Wuhan, and U of C?
 
#81: We've cited scientific medical evidence opposing your claim. Where is a study on ocular coronaviruses? What about the potential intermediate COVID-19 host D.C. XS bx Damn NYC I’m hurting I mhmm dj infected with similar parasites that hydroxychloroquine was developed to treat? How long will USMB prisoners pretend not to notice the COVID-19 report from Los Alamos, Wuhan, and U of C?
 
Post #122 went nuts due to the software/device. As per #81, ocular COVD infection lacks evidence. Readers can ignore whatever links they choose, we will continue to investigate and post on the recent report from Wuhan/Los Alamos/U of California that links COVD suspected intermediate hosts.

Current Events thread for Panama disease links to hydroxychloroquine as well. That is why the addition of new threads on hydroxychl. is a bad idea:

Panama disease fungus (Fusarium oxysporum cubense TR4) uses the drug-resistance gene SGE1:

'....drug efflux pumps analogous to mammalian p-glycoprotein.'

Hydroxychloroquine / P-Glycoprotein

These things are entered into the pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics file for hydroxychloroquine.
 
New Hydroxychloroquine Study Vindicates President Trump and Should End Dr. Fauci’s Career at NIAID and in Medicine

3 Juky 2020 ~~ By Jim Hoft
A new Hydroxychloroquine study conducted by Henry Ford Health System revealed hydroxychloroquine successfully lowered the death rate among hospitalized COVID-19 patients by a significant margin.
According to Just The News the use of hydroxychloroquine cut the mortality rate of coronavirus victims in half.
The study examined 2,541 patients who had been hospitalized in six hospitals between March 10 and May 2, 2020.
More than twenty-six percent (26.4%) of patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine died.
But among those who received hydroxychloroquine, fewer than half that number — 13% — died.
More than 90% of the patients received hydroxychloroquine within 48 hours of admission to the hospital. Scientists say giving the drug early during illness may be a key to success.
Now it is clear in the Henry Ford study along with several international studies that hydroxychloroquine saves lives.
This study should also end Dr. Fauci’s career in medicine.
Dr. Fauci has fought against the use of hydroxychloroquine in treating coronavirus since it was first discovered as a successful treatment to the disease.



Comment:
Until the administration was apprised of the Covid-19 epidemic, I doubt if PDJT ever spoke to Dr. Fauci. PDJT went to war against the Wuhan Covid-19 with the weapons he had.
Dr. Fauci is a product of Obama administration and from what he's previous said to the nation there is obvious bias in his actions.
I'm all for the advancement of medicine and development of new drugs, however in a case like this where a treatment is found to work, all hospitals should be using thattreatment until and if a better treatment becomes available.
Remdesivir may be good but before it was used the HCQ cocktail w/Zinc available and would have saved countless lives. The deaths of those not treated with the HCQ cocktail after it was reported that it worked should be attributed to his decisions.
Please note that Fauci was involved in the development of 'Remdesivir" during the obama importation of Ebola. The drug was never approved because it didn't work and all of the research money was down the tubes. Fauci is also the guy that touted the testing of Remdesivir against Wuhan Covid-19, During his tenure he's diverted a lot of funds and energy toward development of many of the drugs making it possible for people to enjoy Aids as seen on tv commercials.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Media's About-Face On Hydroxychloroquine

8 Jul 2020 ~~ By Katie Pavlich
When President Trump dared to suggest the decades-old malaria drug hydroxychloroquine may help patients with the coronavirus, he was accused by reporters and commentators of dangerously "playing doctor" and engaging in "happy talk" about the disease.

"A Mad Scramble to Stock Millions of Malaria Pills, Likely for Nothing," The New York Times fretted. "The Food and Drug Administration's abrupt decision this week to revoke an emergency waiver for two malaria drugs promoted by President Trump as potential 'game changers' against the coronavirus has left 66 million doses stranded in the federal stockpile - and officials do not yet know what they will do with them."
The media even held Trump responsible for the death of a man who drank fish tank cleaner labeled "chloroquine."

But then, examples of the prescription medication saving lives began to come in.

First, Michigan Democratic state Rep. Karen Whitsett credited the drug with saving her life. She visited the White House in April to tell her story and thanked the president for publicizing it as a potential option.

"Had you not brought this to the forefront of, the HQ, of being able to put this out here, I wouldn't be here today to even have this conversation with you and to be able to talk about the needs of Detroit and talk about the people who really need this. And they need help," she said.

At the time of Whitsett's recovery, doctors around the country were also prescribing hydroxychloroquine in combination with zinc and seeing positive results for suffering patients.

Further, doctors around the world were prescribing it because it was working.

"An international poll of thousands of doctors rated the Trump-touted anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine the best treatment for the novel coronavirus. Of the 2,171 physicians surveyed, 37 percent rated hydroxychloroquine the 'most effective therapy' for combating the potentially deadly illness," the New York Post reported in April. "The survey, conducted by the global health care polling company Sermo, also found that 23 percent of medical professionals had prescribed the drug in the U.S. - far less than other countries."

And finally, a survey of 1,271 American doctors found the vast majority of them would prescribe the drug to a family member.

"Sixty-five percent of physicians across the United States said they would prescribe the anti-malaria drugs chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine to treat or prevent COVID-19 in a family member," the April survey, conducted by health care firm Jackson & Coker, found. "Thirty-percent of the surveyed doctors said they would prescribe the medications to a family member prior to the onset of symptoms if they had been exposed to COVID-19," they found. "Sixty-seven percent of surveyed physicians said they would take the medications themselves to treat COVID-19. Fifty-six percent said they would take the anti-malarial if they displayed symptoms and another 11 percent said they would take the medications if they got very sick from the virus."

Now, a new study from the Henry Ford Health System shows the drug has in fact been effective in combatting the coronavirus, especially when used during early stages of the disease.

"A surprising new study found the controversial antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine helped patients better survive in the hospital," CNN reports. "A team at Henry Ford Health System in southeast Michigan said Thursday their study of 2,541 hospitalized patients found that those given hydroxychloroquine were much less likely to die. Dr. Marcus Zervos, division head of infectious disease for Henry Ford Health System, said 26% of those not given hydroxychloroquine died, compared to 13% of those who got the drug." The team reviewed everyone treated in the hospital system since March.
Surprising? Not to those who have been able to see through the cloud of hysterical, anti-Trump bias and look at the facts. President Trump should be praised, not vilified, for quickly breaking down bureaucratic barriers, making the drug widely available should doctors choose to prescribe it to sick coronavirus patients.
At the time of Whitsett's recovery, doctors around the country were also prescribing hydroxychloroquine in combination with zinc and seeing positive results for suffering patients.
Further, doctors around the world were prescribing it because it was working.
~~Snip~~
Surprising? Not to those who have been able to see through the cloud of hysterical, anti-Trump bias and look at the facts. President Trump should be praised, not vilified, for quickly breaking down bureaucratic barriers, making the drug widely available should doctors choose to prescribe it to sick coronavirus patients.


Comment:
Unfortunately for Ameica, if PDJT found break through in a cure for cancer, the biased MSN would make the claim that he is a liar and charlatan highlighting everyone who had a bad experience during the procedure, the FDA would change all the decades of data they have on the procedure, changing the findings of it's safety to highlighting how dangerous it could be, and Democrat governors would pass bills prohibiting it's use. Just as Fauci, Cuomo, Sisolak, and Whitmer, have denied the efficacy and treament of HCQ cocktail w/Zinc forpatients afflicted with Wuhan Covid-19 virus.
The next question that arisies is when will the LSM begin to recognize that the death rate of Wuhan Covid has dropped precipitously?
 
Last edited:
#14: We have addressed arrhythmia on the snake meat thread, showing that chloroquine links to procyanidins. We have also shown the paradoxical action of procyanidins for synchronizing fungal cultures as well as procyanidin's link to coronavirus. Note that both chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have an anti-arrhythmic properties and are proarrhythmic. But the procyanidin example we used comes from one of the world's premiere heart-maintenance medicines, Crataegus. Crataegus stabilizes cardiac rhythms in humans. The coronavirus link is here:

Procyanidin / Coronavirus
 
Pubmed entries for 'hydroxychloroquine' have been scrambled: they are no longer in chronological order so that the most recent studies can be retrieved, as is usually the case at Pubmed.
 
You should take hydroxychloroquine every day since you are such a believer. Your dear leader took it & said you should to.

Some hospitals like in NYC just kill more than others, so that skews those local doctors results. I choose to believe the very large double blind studies that proved it harms without helping.
 
You should take hydroxychloroquine every day since you are such a believer. Your dear leader took it & said you should to.

Some hospitals like in NYC just kill more than others, so that skews those local doctors results. I choose to believe the very large double blind studies that proved it harms without helping.
What's the matter, you suddenly not trust solid socialist medicine research
 
Remember the full court press to discredit it so you can instead shell out thousands for the new untried wonder drug...... Now dont be a science denier
Meanwhile the much easier and best possible thing people can do for this country is wear a mask

Wearing a proper mask is fine and dandy but if you get sick you should be required to take an very expensive drug rather than dirt cheap hydroxychloroquine so the pharmaceutical industry can profit off your illness. That’s the American way! Support your pharmaceutical industry.
 
trumpville.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top