Hunter Bidrn Blows Off Deadline To Turn Over His Business Records To The Oversight Committee

yeah they have subpena power, they can subpena records all day of private individuals...you don't have a right to ignore a subpena.


In Eastland v. U.S. Servicemen’s Fund, the Supreme Court concluded that the Clause acts as a significant barrier to judicial interference in Congress’s exercise of its subpoena power.1 The case involved a suit filed by a private non-profit organization against the Chairman of a Senate subcommittee seeking the Court to enjoin a congressional subpoena issued to a bank for the non-profit’s account information.2 The subpoena was issued as part of an investigation into alleged subversive activities harmful to the U.S. military conducted by the organization.3 The Court held that because the power to investigate and to do so through compulsory process plainly constitutes an indispensable ingredient of lawmaking, the Clause made the subpoena immune from judicial interference.4 Eastland is generally cited for the proposition that the Clause prohibits courts from entertaining pre-enforcement challenges to congressional subpoenas.5 As a result, the lawfulness of a subpoena usually may not be challenged until Congress seeks to enforce the subpoena through either a civil action or contempt of Congress.6

I would tell them to fuck off.
 
C'mon Government -

Hunter be busy:

He is an Eastern European Oil Executive.
He is a world class painter.
He is a Chinese Financier.
He is a North African Land Developmemt Manager.

All of this while high on coke banging hookers -

If that is not a Presidential Resume -

Hunter 2024
 
He did no such thing.

Congress has not proven they are entitled to anything.
Yes he did.....consequences of his ongoing improprieties.....now his disk contents are in the hands of journalists of both political persuasions, a copy has been officially entered into the congressional record, the FBI has the actual laptop.

Where is it congress has to show why they are entitled? Subpoena is about all they'd need, but it's way beyond that now.
 
Where is it congress has to show why they are entitled?
Because people have an expectation of privacy in this country.

There has to be a compelling reason for government to violate that privacy.
 
Because people have an expectation of privacy in this country.

There has to be a compelling reason for government to violate that privacy.
HB forfeited that right under the influence, failing to pickup his laptop that he never said was his for what, 4 years?
 
That makes absolutely no sense, especially in a legal context.
He should have picked his laptop up, but was incapacitated, never called or claimed it. So it's been given to journalists and so on...published on the internet. Kinda moot point after 4 years.
 
He should have picked his laptop up, but was incapacitated, never called or claimed it. So it's been given to journalists and so on...published on the internet. Kinda moot point after 4 years.
And what does that have to do with responding to a congressional subpoena for his business record?
 
And what does that have to do with responding to a congressional subpoena for his business record?
Both go hand in hand in the congressional investigation of Joe Biden and the family dealings with China and a few other countries. This all comes out of the laptop contents.
 

Forum List

Back
Top