Maybe you could explain why......
Because he has privacy rights. Congress would have to justify why they want his private financial information.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe you could explain why......
Those who don't comply with subpoenas are criminals ... aka Democrats.
yeah they have subpena power, they can subpena records all day of private individuals...you don't have a right to ignore a subpena.
In Eastland v. U.S. Servicemen’s Fund, the Supreme Court concluded that the Clause acts as a significant barrier to judicial interference in Congress’s exercise of its subpoena power.1 The case involved a suit filed by a private non-profit organization against the Chairman of a Senate subcommittee seeking the Court to enjoin a congressional subpoena issued to a bank for the non-profit’s account information.2 The subpoena was issued as part of an investigation into alleged subversive activities harmful to the U.S. military conducted by the organization.3 The Court held that because the power to investigate and to do so through compulsory process plainly constitutes an indispensable ingredient of lawmaking, the Clause made the subpoena immune from judicial interference.4 Eastland is generally cited for the proposition that the Clause prohibits courts from entertaining pre-enforcement challenges to congressional subpoenas.5 As a result, the lawfulness of a subpoena usually may not be challenged until Congress seeks to enforce the subpoena through either a civil action or contempt of Congress.6
i’m sure you seem like you have a lot to hide, like the xiden crime syndicateI would tell them to fuck off.
He forfeited them.Because he has privacy rights.
They have.Congress would have to justify why they want his private financial information.
i’m sure you seem like you have a lot to hide, like the xiden crime syndicate
He forfeited them.
They have.
haha there is a lawful subpoena...the Constitution is not violated by lawful subponeas. Try againI stand against unlawful search and seizure. I believe in the Constitution which you do not.
Yes he did.....consequences of his ongoing improprieties.....now his disk contents are in the hands of journalists of both political persuasions, a copy has been officially entered into the congressional record, the FBI has the actual laptop.He did no such thing.
Congress has not proven they are entitled to anything.
Because people have an expectation of privacy in this country.Where is it congress has to show why they are entitled?
HB forfeited that right under the influence, failing to pickup his laptop that he never said was his for what, 4 years?Because people have an expectation of privacy in this country.
There has to be a compelling reason for government to violate that privacy.
That makes absolutely no sense, especially in a legal context.HB forfeited that right under the influence, failing to pickup his laptop that he never said was his for what, 4 years?
He should have picked his laptop up, but was incapacitated, never called or claimed it. So it's been given to journalists and so on...published on the internet. Kinda moot point after 4 years.That makes absolutely no sense, especially in a legal context.
And what does that have to do with responding to a congressional subpoena for his business record?He should have picked his laptop up, but was incapacitated, never called or claimed it. So it's been given to journalists and so on...published on the internet. Kinda moot point after 4 years.
Both go hand in hand in the congressional investigation of Joe Biden and the family dealings with China and a few other countries. This all comes out of the laptop contents.And what does that have to do with responding to a congressional subpoena for his business record?