Hunter Biden

I agree it wasn't "stolen"

Not sure what you mean about Hunter's laptop, there clearly was, hence why he needed blanket pardons for crimes against the United States going back over 10 years

Again, you keep living in this fantasy world, where things haven't actually happened, and you ignore what actually has happened
Bat actually said the he saw no reason operate a special council on Hunter based on his laptop. They assigned one anyways under Joes admin and they got him for tax fraud and lying on a gun form. None of the other garbage yall say there was evidence of
 
So yes I hope the Trump Administration figures out a way to put a stop to what Biden did so it doesn't set a precedent.
Even if they don’t put a stop to it, if it was wrong and immoral then it should not set a president…. unless you believe that two wrongs make a right.
 
I think Trump was embroiled in his impeachment proceedings at the time this came out. The house was run by dumbocrats and there was no way they were going to look into Biden's misdeeds.
Joe did that on national TV years before Trump. No revelations “came out”. It was a win for our country and our VP executed a foreign policy objective not a personal agenda
 
The Biden corruption was very far-reaching. The 51 intelligence agents lying about the laptop was indeed profound.
Ex agents, non gov officials. Not one lie you can point to in that document as they very specifically stated that this was an opinion based on public intel. That was a very dishonest post you just made
 
Bat actually said the he saw no reason operate a special council on Hunter based on his laptop. They assigned one anyways under Joes admin and they got him for tax fraud and lying on a gun form. None of the other garbage yall say there was evidence of
Bat?

Yes, one was assigned finally, after Joe got caught trying to give him a sweet heart deal and it was rejected by the court for it's unprecedented terms. Once that happened, political pressure was why a Special was appointed. The laptop was filled with evidence, hence why he needed a blanket pardon for over a decade, and the rest of the family needed blanket pardons for crimes against the United States.


It also opened the door to the impeachment investigation in to Joey Xiden himself, but give that his own DOJ said he was too senile to prosecute at this time, it was a little late...but the fact he's too senile, doesn't erase his crimes
 
Bat?

Yes, one was assigned finally, after Joe got caught trying to give him a sweet heart deal and it was rejected by the court for it's unprecedented terms. Once that happened, political pressure was why a Special was appointed. The laptop was filled with evidence, hence why he needed a blanket pardon for over a decade, and the rest of the family needed blanket pardons for crimes against the United States.


It also opened the door to the impeachment investigation in to Joey Xiden himself, but give that his own DOJ said he was too senile to prosecute at this time, it was a little late...but the fact he's too senile, doesn't erase his crimes
Barr… sorry, I didn’t proof read.
 
Bat?

Yes, one was assigned finally, after Joe got caught trying to give him a sweet heart deal and it was rejected by the court for it's unprecedented terms. Once that happened, political pressure was why a Special was appointed. The laptop was filled with evidence, hence why he needed a blanket pardon for over a decade, and the rest of the family needed blanket pardons for crimes against the United States.


It also opened the door to the impeachment investigation in to Joey Xiden himself, but give that his own DOJ said he was too senile to prosecute at this time, it was a little late...but the fact he's too senile, doesn't erase his crimes
Just note that Garland appointed the special counsel, a Trump appointee. Barr didn’t. Barr had the laptop for a long time. Why didn’t he act on all this evidence?
 
I didn’t say you used Biden’s pardons as an excuse. You’re not following the thread correctly. Go back and reread..

You are assuming that Trump is going to use Biden's precedent (which you deny) of illegal pardons to hide his own criminality which doesn't exist. You assume that I would be okay with this .. Trump will have no need to blanket pardon his family. You are grasping at straws to deflect from your poor assumptions. Try to do better this is ridiculous!
 
Even if they don’t put a stop to it, if it was wrong and immoral then it should not set a president…. unless you believe that two wrongs make a right.
So you are admitting that what Biden has done is wrong and should be stopped. You are just assuming that Trump might do it to. How dishonorable of you.
 
Joe did that on national TV years before Trump. No revelations “came out”. It was a win for our country and our VP executed a foreign policy objective not a personal agenda
Couple of years before Trump. It just came out during the Sham impeachment process from the Democrats.
 
Ex agents, non gov officials. Not one lie you can point to in that document as they very specifically stated that this was an opinion based on public intel. That was a very dishonest post you just made
Nah it wasn't, you can't equate me with the 51 lying intelligence agents no matter how hard you try. You really are getting stupid here and ridiculous. Flailing
 
You are assuming that Trump is going to use Biden's precedent (which you deny) of illegal pardons to hide his own criminality which doesn't exist. You assume that I would be okay with this .. Trump will have no need to blanket pardon his family. You are grasping at straws to deflect from your poor assumptions. Try to do better this is ridiculous!
I don't think if a person does something wrong that it sets precedent for it being OK. I guess we disagree there.

I do think Trump will issue similar preemptive pardons at the end of his term. If he does this I'd expect people of principle to hold the same position on it as they have now. Its either OK for Biden and Trump or Wrong. Seems like your trying to have it both ways where its wrong for Biden but Ok for Trump
 
So you are admitting that what Biden has done is wrong and should be stopped. You are just assuming that Trump might do it to. How dishonorable of you.
Ive said it several times now. Have from the start. Even though he may have the power to do so I don't think preemptive pardons are right. Nothing dishonorable about assuming Trump will follow suit. Its actually pretty likely and realistic.
 
Couple of years before Trump. It just came out during the Sham impeachment process from the Democrats.
Yes you are right, my mistake. I thought I remembered it being a thing that was public during his Vice Presidency.
 
I don't think if a person does something wrong that it sets precedent for it being OK. I guess we disagree there.

I do think Trump will issue similar preemptive pardons at the end of his term. If he does this I'd expect people of principle to hold the same position on it as they have now. Its either OK for Biden and Trump or Wrong. Seems like your trying to have it both ways where its wrong for Biden but Ok for Trump
don't think if a person does something wrong that it sets precedent for it being OK. I guess we disagree there.
The president of the United States is not just "a person". The things he does can set a precedent. See you learned something here! Keep trying Slade, answer every question! Hahaha
I do think Trump will issue similar preemptive pardons at the end of his term.
Evidence? What crimes does the Trump family commit that are worthy of this statement?
 
Nah it wasn't, you can't equate me with the 51 lying intelligence agents no matter how hard you try. You really are getting stupid here and ridiculous. Flailing
They didn't lie. If you disagree then show the actual quote of what you think they lied about. Also they were all EX agents who admitted they only had public intel to go off of. You recognize that don't you?
 
They didn't lie. If you disagree then show the actual quote of what you think they lied about. Also they were all EX agents who admitted they only had public intel to go off of. You recognize that don't you?
They sure did, they signed on to a letter that said that the laptop had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation repeated over and over in the article. They did this to deflect away from Biden's criminality. Grow up man, your bias is in the way of your judgment.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom