Hello.I dunno if anyone bothered to notice that the claims made in the OP are just wrong. The Nature Letter the article refers to makes no such claims about the Sun being mostly responsible for the warming trend.
The warming trend began over 14,000 years ago. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions are not responsible either.
The Nature Letter the article refers to makes no such claims about the Sun being mostly responsible for the warming trend.
Thread closed
Of course not OPPYDoo. The Nature Letter also didn't print the one graph that showed any of the test results in their Letter Section.. It was PURPOSELY relegated to an obscure index on their website. In fact -- what appears in the Nature article would be subject not only to political pressures at CERN -- but also the editorial judgement of the Nature staff wouldn't it?
My take on the results is to leave open a POSSIBILITY that cosmic radiation FROM THE SUN being a key factor in cloud formation. Cloud formation is MANY MANY times more important than CO2 in determining surface warming trends. THUS --- all this shows so far is THE POSSIBILITY EXISTS that solar magnetics or instabilities COULD have a larger role in temperature change than AGW.
Happy now??