Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And, so you have the same thing, only you have substituted God there. Why not assume that there were two gods?
The atheists want to explain everything without God as that is religion. IOW, they discard God from science as non-existent without any evidence when there is evidence for God as science backs up the Bible. The OP and atheists think It's only Christian religious belief. Nothing of the sort. They won't admit they have atheist religious beliefs.And what difference, in this case, was there a god or not, does this somehow affect the theory? What difference would that make?
Atheism, feminism, homosexuality or football fanatism does not affect scientific research on objective facts.I don't think the creation scientists know exactly how natural selection works at this point. They have found change or adaption through changes in their genes as well as changes through environmental factors. I think both sides agree on the latter, but atheist scientists think it's through mutation or what they think evolution causes.
LolYou ******* moron my first 5 post explain it in enough detail that anyone with a 3 digit IQ could see and 80 IQ could eventually realize it.
You, OTOH, have NO EVIDENCE (not to mention proof) of ANY god.
You are an OCD Mental defective inserting Jesus/Bible into every thread with No scientific/hard evidentiary basis.
It might has well be Vishnu and the Bhagavad Gita.
Or Abott and Costello.
You ******* Brainwashed Moron.
`
You're the one making a religious-type judgment in an atheist thread. Damn these people are getting religion all of a sudden in the Hooters restaurant restrooms. I don't believe it.Maybe go back the sordid/Lewd threads YOU post in. (pervs in bathrooms/transgender stuff)
I'm a science poster trying to keep this a Science, not religion, section.
iiIii
The universe, Earth, and everything in it is here. I also provided the evidence for the global flood, a supernatural event. The Bible is not a science book, but science backs up the Bible.No proof of god exists, this is fiction
The OP is calling himself an ape.
You are also an ape. All humans are. Children learn this fact in science class.If the shoe fits...
A gopher dies like this dumb thread.why is this proof of God and not a gopher?
The facts will outlast your pathetic trolling and short little life.A gopher dies like this dumb thread.
I was able to easily refute the OP as apes don't have it. Also, we found that...The facts will outlast your pathetic trolling and short little life.
abu afak did not explain ape fusion of its two chromosomes and human chromosome 2 fusion correctly. Next, he just discarded his opposition's argument because he's way too stupid to refute it. Facts are facts.You are also an ape. All humans are. Children learn this fact in science class.
You are really very stupid for thinking that refutes anything. You are like a child.I was able to easily refute the OP as apes don't have it.
It was a mutation that worked, like all evolutionary successes.I was able to easily refute the OP as apes don't have it. Also, we found that...
abu afak did not explain ape fusion of its two chromosomes and human chromosome 2 fusion correctly. Next, he just discarded his opposition's argument because he's way too stupid to refute it. Facts are facts.
The evidence shows this isn't even true, so there isn't a common ancestor. However, no atheist is going to admit that. It's why I keep saying there are two types of science today. If creation science was taught in schools, then the general public would have a choice of which science is not biased and true.
I've won ever since arriving here because you, atheists, atheist scientists, and other sinners have lost since the 1850s. All you had to do was produce one OBSERVABLE evidence for evolution and would have won. For example, a monkey that walks like a human....
MY links quite extensively showed this.. 3 or 4 including a youtube for low IQers like you.I was able to easily refute the OP as apes don't have it. Also, we found that...
abu afak did not explain ape fusion of its two chromosomes and human chromosome 2 fusion correctly. Next, he just discarded his opposition's argument because he's way too stupid to refute it. Facts are facts.
The evidence shows this isn't even true, so there isn't a common ancestor. However, no atheist is going to admit that. It's why I keep saying there are two types of science today. If creation science was taught in schools, then the general public would have a choice of which science is not biased and true.
No.Actually, homo sapiens appears after all the rest per that chart and so far we only know for sure the fusion exists in we humans~homo sapiens.
If there really is such "evidence" and it's not another figment of your imaginations, then please show/document such. Share with us the useful links/URLs/Etc.No.
The fusion is shown by evidence to almost certainly have happened before our most recent common ancestor with both Denisovans and Neandertals.
I am not your mommy. Go Google it.If there really is such "evidence" and it's not another figment of your imaginations, then please show/document such.
You don't get the first 4 posts of the thread?If there really is such "evidence" and it's not another figment of your imaginations, then please show/document such. Share with us the useful links/URLs/Etc.
Opinions, yours or others, aren't valid on this.
Show Your Evidence, Please !!!
