HUH??? Dems SUE GOP over Trump's "election is rigged" complaint

[OldLady]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

Relax. Crooked Repubs are rigging the polls in their favor today. It'll all come out in the wash.

Ok Ms Shultz

?

Crooked Debbie Shultz

That was really low. It's true, though. The polls out this morning show the polls tightening again, a lot. Thanks to independents finally making up their minds, apparently.

 

[percysunshine]

Democrats ask judge to sanction Republicans over Trump

The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Trump has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the Nov.8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was completely meritless.
"The RNC strictly abides by the consent decree and does not take part directly or indirectly in any efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud. Nor do we coordinate with the Trump campaign or any other campaign or party organization in any efforts they may make in this area," a RNC spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The RNC remains focused on getting out the vote."
Representatives for the Trump campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.
The DNC asked a New Jersey federal judge to issue an injunction preventing the RNC from spending money on voter integrity efforts, and to instruct its field offices that no employee shall participate in any ballot security measures.

You have GOT to be kidding me!
"watch for fraud" ?!?!
These people are COMPLETE SCUM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/
According to Foval Group founder Scott Foval, “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
“So the Chicago Protest when they shut all that, that was us. It was more him (Bob Creamer, founder of Democracy Partners) than me,” said Aaron Minter, “but none of this was suppose to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.”

You ******* bedwetters are going to wake up in an ocean of piss. Soon.

.
The Democrats are good tacticians. This is just a preemptive accusation for use when Democrats actually get caught cheating.

 

[TNHarley]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

I like it when all a poster can do in reaction to the facts is emit some nervous laughter.

Yeah you lost, get over it.

What does what he said have to do with targeting minorities? Give me a ******* break dude

 

[TNHarley]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

I asked first, answer my question: What is "watching" going to catch? What do watchers do? They stand outside the polling place and look at people as they walk in and out. Did I get that wrong? So maybe they could watch the same person walking in twice, if they're very good watchers and actually remember every single face they see. Like I said, some zealot will take advantage of his open carry rights and .... armed people staring at me is twice as bad.
A bunch of people standing and staring at me as I walk into the polling place and as I walk back out is intimidating--and do you really think they'll be silent, these watchers?
It's a bad idea. And I really want to know what exactly these watchers will accomplish. Not generally, but specifically, TN.

From the article, I don't see how you could tell what he meant. It was a very vague statement.

 

[TNHarley]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

Relax. Crooked Repubs are rigging the polls in their favor today. It'll all come out in the wash.

Ok Ms Shultz

?

Crooked Debbie Shultz

That was really low. It's true, though. The polls out this morning show the polls tightening again, a lot. Thanks to independents finally making up their minds, apparently.

You know I love ya though

 

[easyt65]

OL, the DNC's own leaked emails revealed they plotted against Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary. During the primaries evidence of voter fraud was not only found but video taped. Wikileaks also exposed how Liberal media was / have been skewing the polls. We now have reports of voting machines switching presidential choices from Trump to Hillary on 'straight-party' votes, with ONLY the Presidential choices being switched...ALL in favor of Hillary. (That's one helluva 'malfunction if true) Libs are fighting to allow more and more felons to vote. Illegals are reportedly going around 'door-to-door' to urge people to vote for Hillary. We have seen evidence of the organizing of violent acts at Trump / GOP events connected to the Hillary campaign, Hillary herself, and even to the President / WH.

Hillary does not just WANT to win this election. Hillary MUST win this election if she wants to potentially stay out of jail.

Trump already told her - a mistake IMO - that one of the 1st things he is going to do is appoint an Independent, non-partisan Prosecutor to review her case and if necessary indict and prosecute her. That is enough of a reason for her to do ANYTHING - legal or not - to win this election. Barry hates Hillary - his 1st choice reportedly was Joe Biden, but the death of his son eliminated him. His reported 2nd choice was the Fake Woo-Woo, Warren, and that didn't go. Now his entire legacy, the entire minority-supported socialist Liberal agenda he has worked so hard to impose, is on the line. He KNOWS if Trump wins it's all gone, so he HAS to help Hillary win for HIS own sake. That means he's not above doing anything, as we have seen by his spying on Congress/Reporters/Americans and using the IRS as a weapon against Conservatives in order to secure his re-election.

And in the face of this, Liberals are calling the Republicans crooked?!

I personally feel Obama 'legally lost' his re-election bid - in EVERY critical state that he HAD to win to win re-election there was massive voter fraud reported and recorded. For example, in one county where there were over 60,000 registered Republicans - 85% of those reportedly having voted in the GOP Primary - absolutely ZERO ballots were cast during the general election - not 1 single GOP vote. In another precinct over 120% of registered voters voted in the general election, meaning they had more people vote than they had registered voters. Then you had the famous story of the black female poll monitor who bragged to live national TV cameras that she 'helped Obama win' by voting multiple times. (She was arrested and found guilty of multiple counts of voter fraud, surprise surprise.)

After that voter fraud in the 2012 election,,,
After watching Obama use the IRS as a weapon against citizens he calls his personal 'political enemies'...
After watching the flood of illegals through our extremely open borders...
After reading how millions of dead people and illegals are registered...
After learning illegals HAVE voted already (like the Washington Mall illegal alien terrorist who voted for Hillary)
After reading and seeing all the fraud and scheming by the DNC in their own Primaries...
After the Wikileaks releases identifying the 'All-In' media that has donated to and openly declared they are helping Hillary...
After learning Soros is heavily vested in the company that makes the Voting machines that are in 16 states and those voting machines are suddenly having 'software problems' that have Trump votes switching to Hillary votes (an ODD 'malfunction'...by the way, a SOFTWARE problem involves human 'PROGRAMMING' )...

I have little faith in our election system now and have little doubt the election will be stolen by the DNC / Hillary.

...but that's just me. In the end, it will be what it is, and you just have to either 1) revolt or 2) roll with it. Unless just massively blatant in-your-face provable corruption / criminal 'election theft', I'm gonna roll with it. After all, I am 'Easy'.

God's in control and is the only thing that matters anyway. 'Let Caesar have what is Caesar's'.

 

[percysunshine]

Relax. Crooked Repubs are rigging the polls in their favor today. It'll all come out in the wash.

Ok Ms Shultz

?

Crooked Debbie Shultz

That was really low. It's true, though. The polls out this morning show the polls tightening again, a lot. Thanks to independents finally making up their minds, apparently.

You know I love ya though

And being a boyscout, you would always help an old lady across the street.

 

[TNHarley]

Ok Ms Shultz

?

Crooked Debbie Shultz

That was really low. It's true, though. The polls out this morning show the polls tightening again, a lot. Thanks to independents finally making up their minds, apparently.

You know I love ya though

And being a boyscout, you would always help an old lady across the street.

If she used tampons, I would go get them for her. DEVOTION

 

[OldLady]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

I asked first, answer my question: What is "watching" going to catch? What do watchers do? They stand outside the polling place and look at people as they walk in and out. Did I get that wrong? So maybe they could watch the same person walking in twice, if they're very good watchers and actually remember every single face they see. Like I said, some zealot will take advantage of his open carry rights and .... armed people staring at me is twice as bad.
A bunch of people standing and staring at me as I walk into the polling place and as I walk back out is intimidating--and do you really think they'll be silent, these watchers?
It's a bad idea. And I really want to know what exactly these watchers will accomplish. Not generally, but specifically, TN.

From the article, I don't see how you could tell what he meant. It was a very vague statement.

I saw the clip where he said that, way back. He was talking about voter fraud at the time, all the dead Democrats that vote, and all the illegals that are voting. Might have been in Pennsylvania during the speech where he said if he loses in PA, it's because it's rigged, stolen from him.

Now, how you can tell just by looking at someone if he/she is illegal or is going to use a dead person's name in the voting booth, I don't know. Like I said, the DNC may be making too much of it, but I think it's better to be prepared so if some of the Trump cowboys get a little overcharged, there's no bickering over what to do.

 

[HappyJoy]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

You guys are going to keep going on with this lie, aren't you?

Read: The Clinton Polling Conspiracy That Doesn't Exist

Oversampling is common and doesn't mean what you think it does in this conext.

 

[TNHarley]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

You guys are going to keep going on with this lie, aren't you?

Read: The Clinton Polling Conspiracy That Doesn't Exist

Oversampling is common and doesn't mean what you think it does in this conext.

9%?

 

[JakeStarkey]

the judge will tell both parties they will be held in contempt if any document intimidation is provided

 

[Fenton Lum]

Democrats ask judge to sanction Republicans over Trump

The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Trump has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the Nov.8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was completely meritless.
"The RNC strictly abides by the consent decree and does not take part directly or indirectly in any efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud. Nor do we coordinate with the Trump campaign or any other campaign or party organization in any efforts they may make in this area," a RNC spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The RNC remains focused on getting out the vote."
Representatives for the Trump campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.
The DNC asked a New Jersey federal judge to issue an injunction preventing the RNC from spending money on voter integrity efforts, and to instruct its field offices that no employee shall participate in any ballot security measures.

You have GOT to be kidding me!
"watch for fraud" ?!?!
These people are COMPLETE SCUM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/
According to Foval Group founder Scott Foval, “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
“So the Chicago Protest when they shut all that, that was us. It was more him (Bob Creamer, founder of Democracy Partners) than me,” said Aaron Minter, “but none of this was suppose to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.”

You ******* bedwetters are going to wake up in an ocean of piss. Soon.

The DNC is ruthless , even if it could be a legal action. Makes me lose respect for both of these cheating parties. RNC, DNC
If someone is smart next election, they will distance themself away from either of these parties.

Lovely concept, but the american public lacks the courage and personal responsibility to challenge, in any meaningful way, the status quo, primarily because they'd rather scream at each other.

 

[HappyJoy]

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" | Zero Hedge
Crooked Dems are SLIME

You guys are going to keep going on with this lie, aren't you?

Read: The Clinton Polling Conspiracy That Doesn't Exist

Oversampling is common and doesn't mean what you think it does in this conext.

9%?

Republicans oversample in their polls too. It's how campaigns identify the views of small sub groups so that they can target their messaging. You can't do that until you know their views.

Also, the emails are from 2008 not 2015 or 2016.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

I like it when all a poster can do in reaction to the facts is emit some nervous laughter.

Yeah you lost, get over it.

What does what he said have to do with targeting minorities? Give me a ******* break dude

Learn to read:

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

 

[koshergrl]

Democrats ask judge to sanction Republicans over Trump

The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Trump has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the Nov.8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was completely meritless.
"The RNC strictly abides by the consent decree and does not take part directly or indirectly in any efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud. Nor do we coordinate with the Trump campaign or any other campaign or party organization in any efforts they may make in this area," a RNC spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The RNC remains focused on getting out the vote."
Representatives for the Trump campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.
The DNC asked a New Jersey federal judge to issue an injunction preventing the RNC from spending money on voter integrity efforts, and to instruct its field offices that no employee shall participate in any ballot security measures.

You have GOT to be kidding me!
"watch for fraud" ?!?!
These people are COMPLETE SCUM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/
According to Foval Group founder Scott Foval, “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
“So the Chicago Protest when they shut all that, that was us. It was more him (Bob Creamer, founder of Democracy Partners) than me,” said Aaron Minter, “but none of this was suppose to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.”

You ******* bedwetters are going to wake up in an ocean of piss. Soon.

The DNC is ruthless , even if it could be a legal action. Makes me lose respect for both of these cheating parties. RNC, DNC
If someone is smart next election, they will distance themself away from either of these parties.

Lovely concept, but the american public lacks the courage and personal responsibility to challenge, in any meaningful way, the status quo, primarily because they'd rather scream at each other.

Another retard who has no concept of history.

Americans in CITIES lack the courage.

Those of us in the rest of the country are plenty courageous.

 

[TNHarley]

Like I've mentioned before, where I vote we can't have "poll watchers" because the parking lot is too small. They'd be standing in the street. Or across the road in the ditch. But we are an open carry state, and I don't like the idea of snarling Trump supporters with AR-whatever's over their shoulders glaring at voters as they walk into the voting places elsewhere. It serves no purpose, except to intimidate voters. What is watching going to catch? Really?

There are bunches of official watchers in the polling place (and NO, TN, they aren't all Democrats!) to see things go according to the rules. Maybe the DNC is taking Trump's comment too seriously by bringing a suit, but maybe some of Trump's supporters have got the wrong end of the stick and think it's a good idea to go menace anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump.

Around here, they'd get decked for trying, at least I hope so. Trump will probably win around here, but it isn't even considered polite to ask a person who they voted for, so it wouldn't go over well having people messing about at the polling place.

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

I like it when all a poster can do in reaction to the facts is emit some nervous laughter.

Yeah you lost, get over it.

What does what he said have to do with targeting minorities? Give me a ******* break dude

Learn to read:

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

What does what he said have to do with targeting minorities?

 

[NYcarbineer]

How do you spin "watch for fraud" into voter intimidation? Especially coming from these slimy hypocritical hacks?

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

I like it when all a poster can do in reaction to the facts is emit some nervous laughter.

Yeah you lost, get over it.

What does what he said have to do with targeting minorities? Give me a ******* break dude

Learn to read:

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

What does what he said have to do with targeting minorities?

So you've decided to go full troll now? That's funny, and more proof that Trump is losing.

 

[kaz]

Democrats ask judge to sanction Republicans over Trump

The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Trump has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the Nov.8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was completely meritless.
"The RNC strictly abides by the consent decree and does not take part directly or indirectly in any efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud. Nor do we coordinate with the Trump campaign or any other campaign or party organization in any efforts they may make in this area," a RNC spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "The RNC remains focused on getting out the vote."
Representatives for the Trump campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.
The DNC asked a New Jersey federal judge to issue an injunction preventing the RNC from spending money on voter integrity efforts, and to instruct its field offices that no employee shall participate in any ballot security measures.

You have GOT to be kidding me!
"watch for fraud" ?!?!
These people are COMPLETE SCUM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/
According to Foval Group founder Scott Foval, “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
“So the Chicago Protest when they shut all that, that was us. It was more him (Bob Creamer, founder of Democracy Partners) than me,” said Aaron Minter, “but none of this was suppose to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party.”

You ******* bedwetters are going to wake up in an ocean of piss. Soon.

When Democrats say to watch for voter fraud, they mean to commit voter fraud

 

[TNHarley]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

I like it when all a poster can do in reaction to the facts is emit some nervous laughter.

Yeah you lost, get over it.

What does what he said have to do with targeting minorities? Give me a ******* break dude

Learn to read:

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

What does what he said have to do with targeting minorities?

So you've decided to go full troll now? That's funny, and more proof that Trump is losing.

Why cant you answer the question?