Huge Jury Award against Palestinian Groups [Palestinian Authority and PLO] in Terrorism Case.

[theliq]

**** them!

New York Times ^
The Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization were found liable on Monday by a jury in Manhattan for their role in knowingly supporting six terrorist attacks in Israel between 2002 and 2004 in which Americans were killed and injured. The damages are to be $655.5 million, under a special terrorism law that provides for tripling the $218.5 million awarded by the jury in Federal District Court. The verdict ended a decade-long legal battle to hold the Palestinian organizations responsible for the terrorist acts. While the decision was a huge victory for the dozens of plaintiffs, it could also serve...

About time!

It is a JOKE Roudy considering the number of innocent Palestinians Murdered by Settlers and all...but then the US Judicury is run by Jews as is everything else in the USA.....but it gives you something for you Guys to bleat about....But the Hyprocricy sic is appaulling.....steve..trust you and the family are well

What a thing for you to say, Steve. Previously you told us you weren't anti-Semitic and now you are claiming that the court system in the U.S. is run by Jews. Did you read that little tidbit on some hate site? Maybe you can give us the name of all the head judges in the U.S. Are all their last names Goldberg, perchance, that you know they are Jews?

Don't be silly Hoss,many in the USA Judishury (excuse the spelling) like the Finance Sector etc are prominently Jewish considering the % of Jews in the US it is a high %

Am I Anti Jewish.....NO......Am I Anti Zionist ...Yes but the fundamental hypocrisy was that Palestinians are being to held account but the Israelis are Not...........Why IS THAT

We can start with this...

Smiling steve

 

[theliq]

Quite funny Vig but instead of "Palestinians" it should have read Israelis.......but I suppose it is a matter of where you stand.steve

That would be a lie, I deal with facts!

Really I'd never have known that and neither would anyone else,unless they are a member of the Z Possee.

 

[Roudy]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

What will the award be when Israel is found guilty of murdering 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza?

"The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague has opened an inquiry to ascertain whether war crimes were committed against Palestinians when Israel bombed Gaza last year killing at least 2,000."

Court launches inquiry into Israeli war crimes The Times

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Wrong again, Ya Jew hating pig. Israel achieves what it has on its own.

Don't drink alcohol while on meds.

 

[Vigilante]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

What will the award be when Israel is found guilty of murdering 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza?

"The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague has opened an inquiry to ascertain whether war crimes were committed against Palestinians when Israel bombed Gaza last year killing at least 2,000."

Court launches inquiry into Israeli war crimes The Times

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

 

[theliq]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

What will the award be when Israel is found guilty of murdering 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza?

"The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague has opened an inquiry to ascertain whether war crimes were committed against Palestinians when Israel bombed Gaza last year killing at least 2,000."

Court launches inquiry into Israeli war crimes The Times

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

Surely their Morality,Roudy........so much for "Isrsel"..steve

 

[theliq]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

What will the award be when Israel is found guilty of murdering 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza?

"The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague has opened an inquiry to ascertain whether war crimes were committed against Palestinians when Israel bombed Gaza last year killing at least 2,000."

Court launches inquiry into Israeli war crimes The Times

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Wrong again, Ya Jew hating pig. Israel achieves what it has on its own.

Don't drink alcohol while on meds.

But they have NOT and CANNOT........mind you 67 Billion helps Roudy

 

[Roudy]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

What will the award be when Israel is found guilty of murdering 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza?

"The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague has opened an inquiry to ascertain whether war crimes were committed against Palestinians when Israel bombed Gaza last year killing at least 2,000."

Court launches inquiry into Israeli war crimes The Times

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

Steve doesn't deal in facts, just the usual IslamoNazi run of the mill garbage. I wonder what his Palestinian boyfriends do with the empty bottle after the antisemitic douchebag has finished drinking all of it?

 

[Roudy]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

What will the award be when Israel is found guilty of murdering 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza?

"The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague has opened an inquiry to ascertain whether war crimes were committed against Palestinians when Israel bombed Gaza last year killing at least 2,000."

Court launches inquiry into Israeli war crimes The Times

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

Surely their Morality,Roudy........so much for "Isrsel"..steve

Palestinians and morality? Ha ha ha. Seriously. Now, I'm beginning to think you're high on PCP.

 

[theliq]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

What will the award be when Israel is found guilty of murdering 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza?

"The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague has opened an inquiry to ascertain whether war crimes were committed against Palestinians when Israel bombed Gaza last year killing at least 2,000."

Court launches inquiry into Israeli war crimes The Times

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

I agree(at last) but I was telling you that without overseas AID!!!!!!!!!! Israel could never have achieved this...as you should know....Now use Wiki and find out how much Israel has been given since 1948....including War Reparation from Germany(which I believe they and others are still paying) and others ,Money from US Taxpayers and others,Gifts etc,. Should keep you busy for a few months because there are a lot of them.steve

 

[Roudy]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Wrong again, Ya Jew hating pig. Israel achieves what it has on its own.

Don't drink alcohol while on meds.

But they have NOT and CANNOT........mind you 67 Billion helps Roudy

Made up number you pulled out of your Islam I mean ass of course.

 

[Vigilante]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

Steve doesn't deal in facts, just the usual IslamoNazi run of the mill garbage. I wonder what his Palestinian boyfriends do with the empty bottle after the antisemitic douchebag has finished drinking all of it?

Well, I could have traded barbs with him, as I used to do, or I can simply hit him with facts and numbers that are indisputable, as most computer programs are made by Israeli's in Israel. But, the haters seem to run away when you do that, and it isn't much fun anymore.

 

[Roudy]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

I agree(at last) but I was telling you that without overseas AID!!!!!!!!!! Israel could never have achieved this...as you should know....Now use Wiki and find out how much Israel has been given since 1948....including War Reparation from Germany(which I believe they and others are still paying) and others ,Money from US Taxpayers and others,Gifts etc,. Should keep you busy for a few months because there are a lot of them.steve

Wrong again. They rolled up their sleeves and built and defended their land, and turned it into the miracle it is today.

 

[theliq]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

Steve doesn't deal in facts, just the usual IslamoNazi run of the mill garbage. I wonder what his Palestinian boyfriends do with the empty bottle after the antisemitic douchebag has finished drinking all of it?

Sorry you have the wrong Man................you seem to know a lot about Palestinian Boyfriends Roudy...Are you Gay or what?makes no difference to me being as I'm not Homophobic......so you are still a good (somewhat confused)Guy............steve

 

[Vigilante]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

I agree(at last) but I was telling you that without overseas AID!!!!!!!!!! Israel could never have achieved this...as you should know....Now use Wiki and find out how much Israel has been given since 1948....including War Reparation from Germany(which I believe they and others are still paying) and others ,Money from US Taxpayers and others,Gifts etc,. Should keep you busy for a few months because there are a lot of them.steve

$3.5 Billion or so, as Egypt gets about the same. But that U.N. index DOESN'T include any outside monies, that's just what Israel does by itself, and for a country so small, they seem to be doing OK. Now look at the way your supposed Palestinians LIVE, and the amounts of money that is sent to them, but redirected from the people's use, to arms, equipment to build tunnels, and the continued HATE they teach their young, and anyone with an honest intellect can see that those muslim's are morally and ethically bankrupt!
Hamas Steals Aid From Palestinians Outrage to Follow - US News

 

[theliq]

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

I agree(at last) but I was telling you that without overseas AID!!!!!!!!!! Israel could never have achieved this...as you should know....Now use Wiki and find out how much Israel has been given since 1948....including War Reparation from Germany(which I believe they and others are still paying) and others ,Money from US Taxpayers and others,Gifts etc,. Should keep you busy for a few months because there are a lot of them.steve

Wrong again. They rolled up their sleeves and built and defended their land, and turned it into the miracle it is today.

To a small degree but without the CASH they would be NOWHERE...but Vig will elucidate for you when he finds out on Wiki for you......in a couple of months..steve

 

[theliq]

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

I agree(at last) but I was telling you that without overseas AID!!!!!!!!!! Israel could never have achieved this...as you should know....Now use Wiki and find out how much Israel has been given since 1948....including War Reparation from Germany(which I believe they and others are still paying) and others ,Money from US Taxpayers and others,Gifts etc,. Should keep you busy for a few months because there are a lot of them.steve

$3.5 Billion or so, as Egypt gets about the same. But that U.N. index DOESN'T include any outside monies, that's just what Israel does by itself, and for a country so small, they seem to be doing OK. Now look at the way your supposed Palestinians LIVE, and the amounts of money that is sent to them, but redirected from the people's use, to arms, equipment to build tunnels, and the continued HATE they teach their young, and anyone with an honest intellect can see that those muslim's are morally and ethically bankrupt!

You are a very lazy scholar Vik.....now re-do your homework and give me the correct answer..steve

By the way Jewish kids are taught to HATE,and this I know first hand from Jewish friends,over the years.

Stop talking so much Shit.....to me,you may bluff others Vig but Never Me..steve

 

[Roudy]

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

I agree(at last) but I was telling you that without overseas AID!!!!!!!!!! Israel could never have achieved this...as you should know....Now use Wiki and find out how much Israel has been given since 1948....including War Reparation from Germany(which I believe they and others are still paying) and others ,Money from US Taxpayers and others,Gifts etc,. Should keep you busy for a few months because there are a lot of them.steve

Wrong again. They rolled up their sleeves and built and defended their land, and turned it into the miracle it is today.

To a small degree but without the CASH they would be NOWHERE...but Vig will elucidate for you when he finds out on Wiki for you......in a couple of months..steve

The three billion that Israel get is about the same and a Egypt and Jordan, and as much as two high class apartment buildings in Tel Aviv. It's all symbolic. Get it? No, you never do.

 

[Vigilante]

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

I agree(at last) but I was telling you that without overseas AID!!!!!!!!!! Israel could never have achieved this...as you should know....Now use Wiki and find out how much Israel has been given since 1948....including War Reparation from Germany(which I believe they and others are still paying) and others ,Money from US Taxpayers and others,Gifts etc,. Should keep you busy for a few months because there are a lot of them.steve

$3.5 Billion or so, as Egypt gets about the same. But that U.N. index DOESN'T include any outside monies, that's just what Israel does by itself, and for a country so small, they seem to be doing OK. Now look at the way your supposed Palestinians LIVE, and the amounts of money that is sent to them, but redirected from the people's use, to arms, equipment to build tunnels, and the continued HATE they teach their young, and anyone with an honest intellect can see that those muslim's are morally and ethically bankrupt!

You are a very lazy scholar Vik.....now re-do your homework and give me the correct answer..steve

Sorry Steve, another ***** slap to you....

The main expression of Congressional support for Israel has been foreign aid.[1] Since 1985, it has provided nearly 3 billion in grants annually to Israel, with Israel being the largest annual recipient of American aid from 1976 to 2004 and the largest cumulative recipient of aid ($121 billion, not inflation-adjusted) since World War II.[2] Seventy-four percent of these funds must be spent purchasing US goods and services.[3] More recently, in fiscal year 2014, the US provided $3.6 billion in foreign military aid to Israel.[2] Israel also benefits from about $8 billion of loan guarantees.[2]

 

[Vigilante]

Isrsel is a strong, prosperous, advanced democratic nation while on the other than there has never been a Palestinian state. Palestinians are ruled by thieves, derelicts, or terrorists. Take your pick. Its the Palestinians that have nothing to stand on.

STOP all overseas Monies and Israelis would be living in Mud Huts......as you well know Roudy

Apparently you don't know much, even Wikipedia can help the helpless...

The economy of Israel is a market economy.[13] As of 2013[update], Israel ranks 19th among 187 nations on the UN's Human Development Index, which places it in the category of "Very Highly Developed".

I agree(at last) but I was telling you that without overseas AID!!!!!!!!!! Israel could never have achieved this...as you should know....Now use Wiki and find out how much Israel has been given since 1948....including War Reparation from Germany(which I believe they and others are still paying) and others ,Money from US Taxpayers and others,Gifts etc,. Should keep you busy for a few months because there are a lot of them.steve

$3.5 Billion or so, as Egypt gets about the same. But that U.N. index DOESN'T include any outside monies, that's just what Israel does by itself, and for a country so small, they seem to be doing OK. Now look at the way your supposed Palestinians LIVE, and the amounts of money that is sent to them, but redirected from the people's use, to arms, equipment to build tunnels, and the continued HATE they teach their young, and anyone with an honest intellect can see that those muslim's are morally and ethically bankrupt!

You are a very lazy scholar Vik.....now re-do your homework and give me the correct answer..steve

By the way Jewish kids are taught to HATE,and this I know first hand from Jewish friends,over the years.

Stop talking so much Shit.....to me,you may bluff others Vig but Never Me..steve

When you're being shot at and kidnapped, killed by muslim scum, you do naturally start to hate your oppressor.... I now dislike all muslim's since 9/11, before that, they were just other people to me. I know first hand people killed by them, so don't look for sympathy here!

 

[Phoenall]

montelatici, et al,

This is not exactly accurate.

What will the award be when Israel is found guilty of murdering 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza?

"The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague has opened an inquiry to ascertain whether war crimes were committed against Palestinians when Israel bombed Gaza last year killing at least 2,000."

Court launches inquiry into Israeli war crimes The Times

(COMMENT)

The Office of the Prosecutor, procedurally, has opened a preliminary examination in to what they called: "situation in Palestine;" to make a determination on the reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation pursuant to the criteria under Part V --- Article 53(1), Rome Statutes.

The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:

(a) The information available to the Prosecutor provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been or is being committed;​

(b) The case is or would be admissible under article 17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.​

This is not the same as an investigation into the alleged crimes itself. This is to determine if the several different factors including Issues of Admissibility and the issue of conducting the investigation in an independently or impartially manner; as well as if the case is of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.

I am sure that the court will find the jurisdiction and probably cause to start the formal investigation. But, the Palestinians probably won't like the consequences. While the Palestinians limited the alleged war crimes starting from June 13, 2014 — (a day after three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered by a Hamas cell in the West Bank) this will not preclude the defense from using this or previous events, as evidence. It will not preclude the introduction of evidence of the tunnels, rocket and mortar fire, or documents related to Palestinian Policy on pursuing Jihad and armed struggle. It will be interesting to see how the court finds the counter claims.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don't think Israel has a leg to stand on.

What I fear most is that Palestine will be represented by a bunch of squishy, old fart, PLO/PA lawyers who will not push the real issues.

I suggest a team that includes Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, and Diana Buttu.

Watch this space, and see who the ICC end up going after..........................