Just like Nadler and Schiff then?By limiting access to a single network, our freedom of speech is being limited by the speakers actions.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just like Nadler and Schiff then?By limiting access to a single network, our freedom of speech is being limited by the speakers actions.
You know this, how?
You confuse constitutional actors with someone with a political bias, a reputation for lying, and no intention to act as a journalist.Just like Nadler and Schiff then?
Why did Capitol police give them to congress then?![]()
The thousands of hours of Jan. 6 footage the government wants to keep private
The thousands of hours of Jan. 6 footage the government wants to keep privatenews.yahoo.com
The surveillance videos would provide a "full accounting of the movements of key players," including lawmakers and officers, as well as rioters — which is exactly why "Capitol security officials don't want them out there," Buzzfeed purports
I know, Schiff and Nadler are very good at that. Thanks for pointing it out.You confuse constitutional actors with someone with a political bias, a reputation for lying, and no intention to act as a journalist.
All the networks had access to material the committee released.Just like Nadler and Schiff then?
And none of the footage revealed where they took either Mike Pence or the other members of congress. The locations, and egresses to "safe rooms" throughout the capitol.All the networks had access to material the committee released.
But they did capture Hawlin Hawley, as the MAGA sympathizer tucked tail and ran.And none of the footage revealed where they took either Mike Pence or the other members of congress. The locations, and egresses to "safe rooms" throughout the capitol.
we own them. we the people own them. Not McCarthy..... the government owns all the video from government surveillance... thus we the people own the video.
true, fox has all the snake oil medicine men selling their quackery there and of course the MY Pillow GUY
FOX NEWS also isn't a news source, and spends no money on it, it is merely entertainment....which they constantly claim in court when caught lying.... nor are any of the other sources mentioned that y'all use... considered news sources.
Yeah, about that.I don't believe there are 1,000 to 2,000 that haven't been released.
You do?
![]()
As for the topic itself... please, [...] please keep talking about 1/6 and Trump's insurrection.
The more videos in the public domain of Trump supporters breaking the law, the better.
If congress was given the1/6 video as you claim.... it was for an investigation, in to 1/6. (congress critters already know their own secret escape routes)Why did Capitol police give them to congress then?
Do you know that what you are so worried about would actually be released?
I know, Schiff and Nadler are very good at that. Thanks for pointing it out
What you don't get is that Fox News is the Photoshopped porn version of the news.It's a very simple business concept: the more popular, the more viewers, the more they can charge for advertising. It's too bad left-wing rags can't do the same as Fox, but your people are anti-capitalist until your own practices it by charging people to go to their sites.
How many hours were released by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and why were the 41,000 kept secret until now?Then show me the link the public can view them at.
You can't. As McCarthy has refused to release them to the public.
Why?
Where has the Ray Epps story been proven to not be true? By the Democrats?Carlson, the same guy who fed you the Big Lie, all while admitting it was nonsense in private? The guy who pushed the Ray Epps conspiracy?
The source you're putting your trust in an admitted liar.
Why do we only get to see what an admitted liar will let us see? Why not just release the video to the public?
Great, so you have no problem with Tucker getting this video footage then?There is no "might" about it.
Any mention of 1/6 supports the Democrats (who are currently on "my" side). Any mention of 1/6 tarnishes Trump and all who continue to support the blob.
You are wrong...they had access to it all and selectively picked footage to support their claims.If congress was given the1/6 video as you claim.... it was for an investigation, in to 1/6. (congress critters already know their own secret escape routes)
Schiff and Nadler and the entire committee released all that they had as evidence of the 1/6 investigation.
Why does it matter? Why do you need to see the footage? The left has already said there is nothing there, so, why be opposed if Carlson wants to waste his time sifting through 41,000 hours of footage.Where has McCarthy ever said he would release them to the public?
Why has McCarthy refused to release those 40,000 hours to the public?
Why only to Tucker Carlson? We both know the answer, but I want you to say it.
Where has the Ray Epps story been proven to not be true? By the Democrats?
![]()
Ginning the crowd up the night before did.What color is the sky, buddy?
Because the attack on the capitol by Trump supporters didn't happen at night.
What about that is illegal, exactly?Ginning the crowd up the night before did.