meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,820
- 20,950
- 2,290
Their claim was a documentary type telling of what happened on January 6th.You are wrong...they had access to it all and selectively picked footage to support their claims.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Their claim was a documentary type telling of what happened on January 6th.You are wrong...they had access to it all and selectively picked footage to support their claims.
The insurrectionists showed up the following day.Ginning the crowd up the night before did.
Maybe an attempt at inciting. Crowd smelled a rat, didn't they?What about that is illegal, exactly?
Or indicates that Ray Epps worked for the FBI?
Selected for editorial content......this is the fear from the left that their charade will be exposed through access to the same video footage the J6 committee 'used'.Their claim was a documentary type telling of what happened on January 6th.
Even Ray Epps testimony revealed in a 94 page transcript showed he and friends and family were there before and on J6.The insurrectionists showed up the following day.
The night before would have been DC residents.
He refuses to testify.What did he say?
Maybe an attempt at inciting. Crowd smelled a rat, didn't they?
Senator Dianne Feinstien's chauffeur for 20 years was a Chinese spy. Congressman Eric Swalwell's mistress was a spy for China. President Biden allowed a Chinese Spy balloon to drift and hover over our nuclear missile sites gathering communications and who knows wat else.If you could see all the tapes, you could view how and where the secret service took Mike Pence.
But he can give them to a Putin ass kissing huckster?He has no obligation to release them to the public, does he?
As I said, they can't release footage that shows how and where the secret service took Mike Pence. Or the egress and safe rooms they evacuated the members of congress to.And your hair is on fire about what might be in 40,000 hours of security video? Give us all a break!
Are you an idiot or intentionally ignorant?You know this, how?
Incitement requires advocacy that is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action....else its protected by the 1st amendment and perfectly legal.
There's a rally, a couple of meals and a night's sleep between what Ray Epps said and the attack on the capitol. There's no 'imminent lawless action' in Ray Epps statement.
He's the one making the claim like he has knowledge we don't.Are you an idiot or intentionally ignorant?
It's called common sense.He's the one making the claim like he has knowledge we don't.
You didn't say anything about 'imminent lawless action.'Inciting would be determined at the prosecution level, no on an obscure internet forum.
I never said anything regarding Epps and imminet lawless action.
Is there a reason to? Why is he obligated?He refuses to testify.
Everyone was interviewed. The tecord includes all video. Use your brain, or do you want the MAGAs to know everything next time.*He's the one making the claim like he has knowledge we don't.
Because he is guilty.Is there a reason to? Why is he obligated?
What’s that got to do with winless knowing what is dangerous on the videos?Everyone was interviewed. The tecord includes all video. Use your brain, or do you want the MAGAs to know everything next time.*
* Protip if you get near the VP, they will stack your bodies like cordwood.
You are indeed deeply stupid. You probably are watching Fox right now.What’s that got to do with winless knowing what is dangerous on the videos?
That’s not how it works! You don’t get to may shut up. I get that’s all you gotBecause he is guilty.