- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,173
- 26,364
- 2,288
Southern Oregon.Wonderful. Where's 'here' --??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Southern Oregon.Wonderful. Where's 'here' --??
Why should people who broke our immigration laws be given taxpayer subsidized housing?
Now this lib has moved on from racist….to liar….to *****.Actually, I'm one of the very, very few genuine, fundamental Liberals around here.
Something most of you big government winger types understand very little, if anything, about.
Don't put words in my mouth, *****.
That's another thing about you. You're a known habitual liar, too.
I think I was rather clear for anyone to read in the fact that I do not consent to any federal subsidies or redistribution regardles of yours or anyone elses preferred designated victim status groups so-called ''needs,'' and I certainly do not condone the noton that you and others seem to have that the federal government is of the role to define anyone's ''needs.''
And I don't do that ''wing'' thing, winger.
Now this lib has moved on from racist….to liar….to *****.
Libs sure are nasty people.
Lol, that's not me, Son.You’re inability to control your feelings is mind boggling.
The only thing dimocrap scum have is division and hate. That piece of human debris knows better, it just doesn't care. It only cares about getting heard, about the message being read (heard) by someone stupid enough or unstable enough to believe it.You're confused....as usual. We don't hate brown people. We just don't want the illegals
here. We have no issues with the legal immigrants coming to this country. That is
something that YOU keep ignoring, and always default back to your masters talking points.
Blah, blah, blah….you called me all those nasty names. I didn’t read the rest of your obvious rant.As I said. Do not put words in my mouth. One time I'm gonna tell you that. Once. I'm not going to continue being so gentlemanly about your observably fraudulent, desperate claims.
And yes, you're still no less of a fraud. You're still no less of a habitual liar and you're still no less of a nasty racist. This is all glaringly observable to anyone who reads the pablum you write on here. i think you;ve grown so used to using victimhood as a currency that you've never adopted any sense of self-awareness. Or maybe it's just your nature. Likely a bit of both.
You need to learn what the proper role of the federal government is so that you're at least rudimentally educated as to the proper argument to make and the more relevant questions to ask rather than trying to coax the idiots around here into buying into your big government mindset that the problem is a matter of which designated victim status group the federal government defines as more ''needy'' than the other rather than the recognizing the fact that it has no business at all stealing and redistributing everybody elses paycheck to your own preferred designated victim status group.
As I said. Do not put words in my mouth. One time I'm gonna tell you that. Once. I'm not going to continue being so gentlemanly about your observably fraudulent, desperate claims.
And yes, you're still no less of a fraud. You're still no less of a habitual liar and you're still no less of a nasty racist. This is all glaringly observable to anyone who reads the pablum you write on here. i think you;ve grown so used to using victimhood as a currency that you've never adopted any sense of self-awareness. Or maybe it's just your nature. Likely a bit of both.
You need to learn what the proper role of the federal government is so that you're at least rudimentally educated as to the proper argument to make and the more relevant questions to ask rather than trying to coax the idiots around here into buying into your big government mindset that the problem is a matter of which designated victim status group the federal government defines as more ''needy'' than the other rather than the recognizing the fact that it has no business at all stealing and redistributing everybody elses paycheck to your own preferred designated victim status group.
Or worse, a liberturdian. Hippies of the Right. Too cowardly to admit what they are, democrats without a party, wandering in the wilderness looking for a home.Blah, blah, blah….you called me all those nasty names. I didn’t read the rest of your obvious rant.
I KNEW you had to be a liberal.
I don’t think it’s even American. It comes onto an American website to scream…..racist!!….*****!!!….fraud!!!!…..liar!!!…at Americans.Or worse, a liberturdian. Hippies of the Right. Too cowardly to admit what they are, democrats without a party, wandering in the wilderness looking for a home.
I'd feel sorry for it if it weren't so funny.
Universally reviled by advocates of all encompassing government everywhere.Or worse, a liberturdian. Hippies of the Right. Too cowardly to admit what they are, democrats without a party, wandering in the wilderness looking for a home.
I'd feel sorry for it if it weren't so funny.
I also suspect it is female or a confused male. It's Avatar is of Brad Pitt from his movie 'Troy'. Which was a good movie if you like those kinds of things. I do if they're well done. It wasI don’t think it’s even American. It comes onto an American website to scream…..racist!!….*****!!!….fraud!!!!…..liar!!!…at Americans.
I think it’s either British or Australian.
Oh, you’re right….I didn’t notice that. But agree….it would be weird for a straight man to use Brad Pitt as an avatar. Maybe he’s one of those gender dysphoric people and he’s lashing out in anger at anyone and everyone.I also suspect it is female or a confused male. It's Avatar is of Brad Pitt from his movie 'Troy'. Which was a good movie if you like those kinds of things. I do if they're well done. It was
But I've never had the urge to use Brad Pitt as an Avatar. He doesn't do anything for me
Universally reviled as gutless, nutless back-biters who choose to criticize everything, offer nothing and contribute even less.Universally reviled by advocates of all encompassing government everywhere.
Blah, blah, blah….you called me all those nasty names. I didn’t read the rest of your obvious rant.
I KNEW you had to be a liberal.
I think we're surrounded by a bunch of big government nutsacks who are afraid to ask the more relevant questions in their proper scope because...well..they'll be exposed as big government nutsacks.Universally reviled by advocates of all encompassing government everywhere.
And you. Heh heh. I wouldn't give a bucket of piss for your opinion nor your future. You'll be pushing up weeds soon enough. That clock is winding down fast.Universally reviled as gutless, nutless back-biters who choose to criticize everything, offer nothing and contribute even less.
And the outright thieves of political philosophy they have never, ever, in their totally unimaginative lives ever beena part of. The most Useless human beings on the Planet. Even worse than dimocrap scum. AT least dimocrap scum take a stand on something. It's wrong, everything they do is wrong and stupid but at least they take a stand.
liberturdians run from everything. They even try to pretend they follow Ayn Rand but here's the truth --
"Brief Summary,"
The Objectivist, Sept. 1971, 1
Above all, do not join the wrong ideological groups or movements, in order to "do something." By "ideological" (in this context), I mean groups or movements proclaiming some vaguely generalized, undefined (and, usually, contradictory) political goals.
"libertarian" hippies, who subordinate reason to whims, and substitute anarchism for capitalism.) To join such groups means to reverse the philosophical hierarchy and to sell out fundamental principles for the sake of some superficial political action which is bound to fail. It means that you help the defeat of your ideas and the victory of your enemies. (For a discussion of the reasons, see "The Anatomy of Compromise" in my book Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.)
^^ You could learn a lot from this quote ^^
What Can One Do?"
Philosophy: Who Needs It, 202
¶
The "libertarians" . . . plagiarize Ayn Rand's principle that no man may initiate the use of physical force, and treat it as a mystically revealed, out-of-context absolute . . . .
In the philosophical battle for a free society, the one crucial connection to be upheld is that between capitalism and reason. The religious conservatives are seeking to tie capitalism to mysticism; the "libertarians" are tying capitalism to the whim-worshipping subjectivism and chaos of anarchy. To cooperate with either group is to betray capitalism, reason, and one's own future.
^^ And this one ^^
Lol, that's not me, Son.
Universally reviled as gutless, nutless back-biters who choose to criticize everything, offer nothing and contribute even less.
And the outright thieves of political philosophy they have never, ever, in their totally unimaginative lives ever beena part of. The most Useless human beings on the Planet. Even worse than dimocrap scum. AT least dimocrap scum take a stand on something. It's wrong, everything they do is wrong and stupid but at least they take a stand.
liberturdians run from everything. They even try to pretend they follow Ayn Rand but here's the truth --
"Brief Summary,"
The Objectivist, Sept. 1971, 1
Above all, do not join the wrong ideological groups or movements, in order to "do something." By "ideological" (in this context), I mean groups or movements proclaiming some vaguely generalized, undefined (and, usually, contradictory) political goals.
"libertarian" hippies, who subordinate reason to whims, and substitute anarchism for capitalism.) To join such groups means to reverse the philosophical hierarchy and to sell out fundamental principles for the sake of some superficial political action which is bound to fail. It means that you help the defeat of your ideas and the victory of your enemies. (For a discussion of the reasons, see "The Anatomy of Compromise" in my book Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.)
^^ You could learn a lot from this quote ^^
What Can One Do?"
Philosophy: Who Needs It, 202
¶
The "libertarians" . . . plagiarize Ayn Rand's principle that no man may initiate the use of physical force, and treat it as a mystically revealed, out-of-context absolute . . . .
In the philosophical battle for a free society, the one crucial connection to be upheld is that between capitalism and reason. The religious conservatives are seeking to tie capitalism to mysticism; the "libertarians" are tying capitalism to the whim-worshipping subjectivism and chaos of anarchy. To cooperate with either group is to betray capitalism, reason, and one's own future.
^^ And this one ^^