How were the “experts” so wrong about 2024 election and will it carry to 2028?

[Toddsterpatriot]

so yeah, not capitalism.

I guess you could show me where capitalism requires allowing your banking system to collapse, if you think it proves your point. And if you think I'd care.

 

[pknopp]

If you think Glass-Steagall prevented banks from writing bad mortgages, you're wrong.

It allowed the banks to gamble money that wasnt theirs which is what made the problem so large.

 

[pknopp]

I guess you could show me where capitalism requires allowing your banking system to collapse, if you think it proves your point. And if you think I'd care.

Thats capitalism. You dont even understand what you pretend to support.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It allowed the banks to gamble money that wasnt theirs which is what made the problem so large.

Banks "gamble money that wasn't theirs", every time they make a loan or write a mortgage.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Thats capitalism. You dont even understand what you pretend to support.

Banking system failures is capitalism? DURR

 

[marvin martian]

This one was so embarrassed that she quit.

Ann Selzer​

Another big name in the polling industry, Ann Selzer released a shock poll the weekend before Election Day that showed Harris up by 3 points in Iowa, despite previous polling showing Trump with a healthy lead there and the state backing the Republican in the previous two elections.

The poll, conducted by Selzer & Co. for The Des Moines Register and Mediacom, found that 47 percent of Iowa voters supported Harris and 44 percent supported Trump.

Despite its historical reputation of being accurate, Selzer's poll did not reflect the final result in Iowa. Trump took the state with a comfortable 14-point lead, increasing his margin there from 2020, when he won the state by 9 points.

Here are some other much ballyhooed pollsters that got it all wrong.

MSN

She should have been investigated for that. It was so obviously a lie to try to influence the election in Harris' favor.

I have ZERO doubt she was paid to do that. And paid well, I hope, because it ended her career.

 

[pknopp]

Banks "gamble money that wasn't theirs", every time they make a loan or write a mortgage.

Not the same at all. They have collateral in retail loans.

 

[pknopp]

Banking system failures is capitalism? DURR

Yes, yes it is if bankers act poorly in their dealings.

 

[otto105]

They weren't paid back but despite the point. Nowhere in Capitalism do we find the idea of the government bailing out a failed business.

In capitalism if you run your business poorly, you fail.

The coal miners industry under trump?

 

[marvin martian]

Just look at how hard the DemoKKKrats on this thread are lobbying for the cartels.

The connection is irrefutable. The cartels and the DemoKKKrats have been working hand in hand for YEARS to bring drugs and slaves into our country.

 

[pknopp]

The coal miners industry under trump?

I don't know if that is applicable or not.

 

[otto105]

Just look at how hard the DemoKKKrats on this thread are lobbying for the cartels.

The connection is irrefutable. The cartels and the DemoKKKrats have been working hand in hand for YEARS to bring drugs and slaves into our country.

Hilarious


Do you know more about shit or Shinola?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not the same at all. They have collateral in retail loans.

Every loan is a gamble with money that isn't theirs.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes, yes it is if bankers act poorly in their dealings.

Individual banks fail; we're talking about the banking system.

Only morons think it would be better to let 1/3 of banks fail, at the cost of trillions rather than to make short-term loans that were paid back at a profit.

 

[marvin martian]

Hilarious


Do you know more about shit or Shinola?

Cartel lover says what?

 

[pknopp]

Every loan is a gamble with money that isn't theirs.

There is a very valid reason the two sides were kept seperate all those years.

 

[pknopp]

Individual banks fail; we're talking about the banking system.

Irrelevant. That is capitalism. Are you arguing capitalism creates a system that can cause great harm to the economy?

Only morons think it would be better to let 1/3 of banks fail, at the cost of trillions rather than to make short-term loans that were paid back at a profit.

Again, irrelevant.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There is a very valid reason the two sides were kept seperate all those years.

Didn't prevent a single bad mortgage from being written.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Irrelevant. That is capitalism. Are you arguing capitalism creates a system that can cause great harm to the economy?



Again, irrelevant.

Panics happen, even under capitalism.

Allowing the banking system to fail during a panic is stupid.

 

[pknopp]

Didn't prevent a single bad mortgage from being written.

Because we got rid of the regulations. That was a part of the quid pro quo.