How Trump is being set up regarding 1/6

[Mac1958]

You don’t swindle a US presidential election. The fact that you even think that’s possible it quite literally insane

The group pathology is as powerful as ever. No light is getting in the orange rabbit hole, still. ******* incredible.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Why should I do that? It's not the world's job to do any work dispelling your childish fantasies. Do your own book report.

WOW... I explain that the ability to prove or disprove the whole democrat lie is in their own hands. All you have to do is get in front of a FISA judge with Probable Cause to obtain the info. You claim this was an insurrection, so this should be really easy for you to get probable cause and obtain the information, but you refuse....

WHY?

Perhaps it's because you do not possess the evidence you say you have??
Perhaps it's that your actions have already discredited you and no one will believe you....
Perhaps is because it is an outright lie...

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Let's just say Trump set himself up for this, far better than anyone else could have. Most Presidents (all really) would have and did know better, or maybe they just cared more about their oath of office, The Constitution and American Historic norms than Donny.

Oh please. You dems are just plain old liars
.

 

[Slade3200]

Again, making your empty claim without proof. He may have been mistaken. (He might still be mistaken.) But it still isn’t a “lie.” You persist in conflating the two terms. Shitty way to make your alleged “point.”

Obumbler wasn’t running against Trump, by the way.

Staying something as fact that you don’t know is a fact IS A LIE. He was concocting a fall guy and an enemy to cover for an embarrassing loss. The tactic is obvious and has been something Trump has done his entire life. He teaches about it in his seminars and books. Never admit defeat, never apologize, keep repeating until people believe you…. All BS Trump tactics.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Who determines if the communications were for government matters to avoid detection?

How about we apply this to Clinton... The court can resolve that issue as it could not do because the information had been deleted and wiped...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh please. You dems are just plain old liars
.

C'mon now.....many of 'em are fancy liars.

 

[BackAgain]

The 1/6 hearings are irrelevant. Republicans are ignoring it and Democrats are nuts, the hearings change nothing

The “point” of the hearings is entirely political. It’s never been about anything else.

 

[Slade3200]

How about we apply this to Clinton... The court can resolve that issue as it could not do because the information had been deleted and wiped...

Ok, the courts. So any gov official found using personal accounts for communication should be investigated by FBI/DOJ and then courts should resolve any issues… is that what you’re saying?

 

[BackAgain]

I’m sorry sir, this post of yours has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Please get back on track.

Good idea. Too bad you refuse to do so.
You’re now on ignore. Buh bah.

 

[Slade3200]

Good idea. Too bad you refuse to do so.
You’re now on ignore. Buh bah.

This isn’t about me or what I do or about ignoring… please just stick to the topic. Thank you!

 

[kaz]

The “point” of the hearings is entirely political. It’s never been about anything else.

Agreed

 

[bripat9643]

The zero self awareness of the cult, on parade.

They swear up and down he sent a tweet calling them off, and that it worked.

Point out to them it was made hours after the violence started.


Their response? "Uh, golly gee, what was he supposed to do?"

This is so freakish and bizarre to watch.

I never claimed "he sent a tweet calling them off."

Tell us what you think he was supposed to do when it started long before he knew about it?

 

[BackAgain]

And was given all the information and tools to discover his mistake well before January 6th.

So nobody but his mommy and his cult would give him a pass, at that point.

Wrong. He was given opinions and stated conclusions. What he wanted was to have it all aired out in a proper court setting. Evidentiary. With cross examination etc.

Your last sentence is gibberish. But that’s pretty usual.

The fact is that there are still no evidentiary hearings held in a court of law that you can point to. Were there some sloppy pleadings? Yes. We’re there maybe other procedural impediments? Maybe. But it doesn’t much matter now. The result is the same. No evidentiary court hearings addressing the evidence (or the lack of evidence).

 

[bripat9643]

You don’t swindle a US presidential election. The fact that you even think that’s possible it quite literally insane

But all you prog turds claim that Trump colluded with the Russians to make Hillary lose.

Are you ever going to get your story straight?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Ok, the courts. So any gov official found using personal accounts for communication should be investigated by FBI/DOJ and then courts should resolve any issues… is that what you’re saying?

Like any other criminal case, you find evidence of the crime, you investigate it, if you find cooberating evidence you get a warrant to obtain the records. If there is a secrecy problem the court sets the standards on what can be disclosed. Follow the damn law... that's what it's there for.

 

[bripat9643]

And was given all the information and tools to discover his mistake well before January 6th.

So nobody but his mommy and his cult would give him a pass, at that point.

Your lies are not "tools." No "mistake" has been demonstrated.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You still haven’t made a coherent point out of any facts.

I heard you the first ten times, crybaby.

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong. If somebody says something is stolen without proof it is stolen and with intel coming from his own team that it was not stolen… then he is lying.

So it's not legitimate unless everyone in his administration agrees? When has that ever happened in the history of the world?

You're a ******* moron.

 

[bripat9643]

Oops, another whiny cultist who thinks his mommy works here. Make your own big boy points.

I just did, moron.

 

[Slade3200]

Agreed

What else would the point of a congressional hearing be for? Can you give an example of one that wasn’t political?