(1) State facts
(2) State opinions, BUT, specify that it is your opinion (explaining why is helpful)
(3) State evidences and supports to your statements
...lastly
(4) DON'T MAKE ANYTHING PERSONAL OR NEGATIVE!... why? because it puts the person on the defensive and then the discussion goes off the rails.
It might not be as much fun, but you might actually get somewhere!
That is pretty much the model I always try to follow.
What I run into is that liberals think that calling someone a "Racist" is stating a "fact" and "supporting evidence", and don't understand why regular people take it as an uncalled for insult.
That is not exactly true Correll. You and I had engaged in several heated discussions most of your post are abusive.
If you don't want to be called racist then you should stop posting hatred against minorities. Then when people ( like me ) attacked you ----- You don't like it.
I do tried to engage in a decent discussion as much as I can but lots of members are not reasonable, no longer capable or just plain hopeless.
Most of my posts are abusive because most liberals can't engage in more than one or two posts before they start vilely smearing me with false accusations.
Thus, past that point, as they keep up their vile lies, I call them on it, and insult them back.
Have to admit...Your insults are kinda cute
It's not the real me. I'm not some sadistic troll like many of the left on this site are,
I do it as a tactical anti-propaganda move because I realize what the vile filthy left is doing.
THey want to create a false image for the Right, based on spewing their vile lies until the appearance of credibility is attained by massive repetition, perhaps by counters and denials being exhausted because reasonable people stop responding.
Proof by assertion - Wikipedia
"Proof by assertion, sometimes informally referred to as
proof by repeated assertion, is an
informal fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction.
[1] Sometimes, this may be repeated until challenges dry up, at which point it is asserted as fact due to its not being contradicted (
argumentum ad nauseam).
[2] In other cases, its repetition may be cited as evidence of its truth, in a variant of the
appeal to authority or
appeal to belief fallacies.
[3]
This fallacy is sometimes used as a form of
rhetoric by politicians, or during a debate as a
filibuster. In its extreme form, it can also be a form of
brainwashing.
[1] Modern politics contains many examples of proofs by assertion. This practice can be observed in the use of political
slogans, and the distribution of "
talking points", which are collections of short phrases that are issued to members of modern political parties for recitation to achieve maximum message repetition."
