DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 7,227
- 11,518
- 2,118
DonGlock26 - Are you arguing that we can attribute guilt or innocence by the outcome of a civil trial?
I answered your question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DonGlock26 - Are you arguing that we can attribute guilt or innocence by the outcome of a civil trial?
Now answer my next question please: Are you arguing that we can attribute guilt or innocence by the outcome of a civil trial?I answered your question.
You need
Now answer my next question please: Are you arguing that we can attribute guilt or innocence by the outcome of a civil trial?
Let's be civil and answer questions in the order they are asked: Are you arguing that we can attribute guilt or innocence by the outcome of a civil trial?Do you find fault with the jury's findings?
Well if you prefer "one needs" meaning one cannot compute whether something is overrepresented without defining what we are measuring to do the computation.I don't need to do anything. Have you taken leave of your senses?
Well if you prefer "one needs" meaning one cannot compute whether something is overrepresented without defining what we are measuring to do the computation.
Let's be civil and answer questions in the order they are asked: Are you arguing that we can attribute guilt or innocence by the outcome of a civil trial?
Then answer #129 and quit pretending to be ignorant.
In July 2023, Judge Kaplan said that the verdict found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word, i.e. not necessarily implying penile penetration. In August 2023, Kaplan dismissed a countersuit and wrote that Carroll's accusation of rape is "substantially true".
You knew where I was going all along...
Trump raped that woman, something everyone who followed the trial knows, did you follow that trial?
I'm not looking for anything, what would you like me to look for?As I said, post your findings here.
That's because the question of overrepresentation is ambiguous, I've asked you to address that but you seem reticent to do so.You aren't answering my question.
I'm not looking for anything, what would you like me to look for?
There are two oustanding questionsYou seem to have lost track of your own line of questioning.![]()
That's because the question of overrepresentation is ambiguous, I've asked you to address that but you seem reticent to do so.
There are two oustanding questions
1. Your question: Who is overrepresented as homicide offenders?
2. My question: Trump raped that woman, something everyone who followed the trial knows, did you follow that trial?
Until you address the inherent ambiguity in 1. I cannot provide an answer.
Nonsense. Quit dodging.![]()
I followed the civil trial.How do you know Trump raped a woman?
I followed the civil trial.