How To Get Away With Murder

You asked Who is overrepresented as homicide offenders?

Are seeking the name of a person? are you seeking some subgroup of society? how do we decide if some number is or is not "over" represented? I don't think you understand your own question.

Answer it directly then.
 
I'll publicly accept that OJ was guilty of murder if you publicly accept that Trump is guilty of rape, is that equitable?

I'm asking you about the evidence that made you decide that Trump committed the crime of rape.
You cannot answer?
 
The outcome of the trial is all the evidence I need.

Well, if you can't even cite evidence, then I can't take you seriously.
You should consider switching your avatar to a waffle.


BTW- is this the victim that you are talking about?


1734985532011.webp
 
Ladies and Gentlemen the brief but hearty exchange between myself and DonGlock26 beginning at post 124 reveals that a Trump supporter agrees that Trump committed rape. It's a rare thing to meet such an honest and principled Maga devotee, so I'm grateful to him for that.

He argued that OJ Simpson was a murderer on the basis he was found guilty in a civil trial and so therefore Trump is guilty of sexual assault (later clarified as actually equivalent to rape by the Judge) by virtue of the same reasoning - he too was found guilty in a civil trial.

O.J. Simpson was a murder and Donald Trump is a rapist.

I rest my case.
 
Ladies and Gentlemen the brief but hearty exchange between myself and DonGlock26 beginning at post 124 reveals that a Trump supporter agrees that Trump committed rape. It's a rare thing to meet such an honest and principled Maga devotee, so I'm grateful to him for that.

He argued that OJ Simpson was a murderer on the basis he was found guilty in a civil trial and so therefore Trump is guilty of sexual assault (later clarified as actually equivalent to rape by the Judge) by virtue of the same reasoning - he too was found guilty in a civil trial.

O.J. Simpson was a murder and Donald Trump is a rapist.

I rest my case.

Interesting tapout. :popcorn:
 
Ask him to prove his claim not me. I take it you found exactly zero photographs of white people being lynched by black people in the United States, just as I predicted. Therefore it is white people who have been far more violent than black people.

I take it you found exactly zero photographs of white people being lynched by black people in the United States,


Mobs of blacks killing whites isn't exactly unheard of these days.
Photos of the aftermath typically don't get published.

Ask him to prove his claim not me.

I have. He keeps running away.

Now if you have any data concerning the claim,
"Blacks kill more whites every year than whites kill blacks", post it.

Therefore it is white people who have been far more violent than black people.

Unless you have actual data, I don't think you can support that claim for recent history.
Was that the case in the past? Probably, but we're discussing more recent US history.
 
Todd posted about white victims by blacks/ back victims by whites but he needs to name the case where a black person killed somebody white in public and was able to go free after a trial.

If I do that, will you learn the meaning of "per capita"?
 
What's more Toddsterpatriot almost every one of those smiling torturers we see in these historic images would have proudly claimed to be a Christian and attend Church every Sunday, but it's clear they are not, no person who participates in that or supports it as you do, can possibly be a Christian.

They - like you - are fakes, America is a fake country, a white supremacist colony to this day.

You don't need to remind me of the horrific things democrats have done to blacks in America.

And you're still a whiny twat.
 
I take it you found exactly zero photographs of white people being lynched by black people in the United States,

Mobs of blacks killing whites isn't exactly unheard of these days.
Photos of the aftermath typically don't get published.

Ask him to prove his claim not me.

I have. He keeps running away.

Now if you have any data concerning the claim,
"Blacks kill more whites every year than whites kill blacks", post it.

Therefore it is white people who have been far more violent than black people.

Unless you have actual data, I don't think you can support that claim for recent history.
Was that the case in the past? Probably, but we're discussing more recent US history.

The LA Riots is a good example.


 
So you don't know what measurements are used to determine overrepresentation in the context of your question.

1734986854960.webp


2019 black homicide offenders 3140
2019 white homicide offenders 2840

Even if you ignore the fact that blacks are about 15% of the population
while whites are about 66% of the population, those raw numbers
would be difficult for an idiot like IM2 or boevans to spin.
 
The United States was founded by white supremacists and it's history has been plagued by the long lasting effects of that foundation.

Every signatory of the constitution was white, every signatory of the declaration of independence was white.

There were no representatives of either black slaves or native Americans, involved in either the drafting or ratification of these founding documents, the founding fathers were all white and some owned black people as property.

Those who expect or believe that such a foundation will not entail racial tension and even violence are either lying or delusional.
 
View attachment 1057180

2019 black homicide offenders 3140
2019 white homicide offenders 2840

Even if you ignore the fact that blacks are about 15% of the population
while whites are about 66% of the population, those raw numbers
would be difficult for an idiot like IM2 or boevans to spin.

One would have to play dumb to ignore it. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom